CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07257016Updated May 4, 2026

HFTO Via Tracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Patients

An interventional study of HFTO and PSV in High Flow Oxygen Therapy and Neuro ICU, sponsored by Capital Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-04.

Sponsored by Capital Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neurocritical patients often require prolonged invasive ventilation due to impaired respiratory drive and airway protection deficits. While early weaning reduces complications and costs, these patients frequently pass spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) yet remain intubated solely for airway protection.

Current practice maintains low-level pressure support ventilation (5-8 cmH₂O) to offset endotracheal tube resistance. However, prolonged ventilation increases risks of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and diaphragm dysfunction. Emerging evidence suggests appropriately sized tubes may not substantially increase work of breathing (WOB).

High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) delivers heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, reducing WOB and improving oxygenation and comfort. While validated for tracheostomized patients, HFOT via tracheal intubation (HFOT-TI) remains unstudied in neurocritical populations during early weaning.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of HFOT-TI in neurocritical patients who have passed SBT but require ongoing airway protection.

Read the detailed description

Neurocritical patients, including those with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or intracranial hemorrhage, often require prolonged mechanical ventilation due to impaired respiratory drive or airway protection needs. Weaning these patients from invasive ventilation involves two key stages: liberation from mechanical support and extubation. Early weaning reduces complications, accelerates recovery, and lowers healthcare costs. Clinical guidelines advocate early weaning assessments for patients ventilated for over 24 hours, followed by spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) to confirm readiness for independent breathing. While patients passing SBT are typically extubated promptly, neurocritical patients often face delayed extubation due to impaired consciousness or inadequate airway protection, despite adequate respiratory function. In these cases, the tracheal tube primarily ensures airway protection rather than ventilatory support.

Traditionally, low-level ventilatory support (e.g., pressure support of 5-8 cmH₂O) is used to counter the inspiratory resistance of the tracheal tube and provide humidified gas. However, prolonged ventilation, even at minimal levels, may increase risks such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and diaphragm dysfunction. Evidence indicates that appropriately sized tracheal tubes may not substantially increase the work of breathing (WOB), and some patients can compensate for this resistance without ventilatory support.

High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT), delivered via nasal cannula or tracheostomy, provides heated, humidified oxygen at high flow rates, enhancing oxygenation, reducing WOB, and improving patient comfort. Emerging evidence supports its role in facilitating weaning in tracheostomized patients and during SBT in intubated patients. However, the safety and feasibility of HFOT via tracheal intubation (HFOT-TI) in neurocritical patients during early weaning remain largely unexplored. Given the prolonged airway protection needs in this population, HFOT-TI may serve as an effective bridge to extubation, potentially minimizing prolonged ventilatory support and associated complications.

Investigators aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of HFOT-TI in neurocritical patients who have passed SBT but require ongoing airway protection. Investigators assessed changes in respiratory parameters and safety outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • High Flow Oxygen Therapy
  • Neuro ICU
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Capital Medical University is the lead sponsor of 283 studies on the registry; 92 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Post-neurosurgical or brain injury patients with stable intracranial status (Glasgow Coma Scale ≥ 9, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score -2 to +1).
  • Successful completion of a 30-minute T-piece spontaneous breathing trial (per standard SBT failure criteria).
  • Poor airway protection capacity (STAGE score \< 6) necessitates ongoing intubation for respiratory support, as determined by the attending physician.
  • Signed informed consent (by patient or legal representative).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to esophageal pressure monitoring (e.g., esophageal varices, recent esophageal surgery).
  • History of chronic respiratory diseases (e.g., COPD, severe asthma).
  • Chronic heart failure (NYHA class III-IV) or severe arrhythmia.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 kg/m².
  • Pregnancy.
  • Anticipated need for tracheostomy without extubation attempt
  • Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HFTO

    Patients with delayed extubation receiving high-flow tracheal oxygen therapy.

    Device: HFTO

  • Active comparator
    PSV

    Patients with delayed extubation receiving low-level pressure support ventilation.

    Device: PSV

Interventions

  • DeviceHFTO

    Use a high-flow oxygen therapy system connected to the endotracheal tube via a dedicated adapter. Initial settings: Flow rate 40 L/min, FiO₂ titrated to maintain patient SpO₂ ≥ 95%.

  • DevicePSV

    Continue low-level pressure support ventilation using a mechanical ventilator. Parameter settings: Pressure support (PS) 5-8 cmH₂O, PEEP 5 cmH₂O, FiO₂ ≤ 0.40.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PTPes

    PTPes is defined as the area enclosed by the Pcw and Pes curves during the inspiratory phase, multiplied by the respiratory rate.

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pmus

    Pmus is defined as the maximum difference between the chest wall recoil pressure (Pcw) and the esophageal pressure (Pes) during inspiration.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Ventilator-Free Days

    Ventilator-Free Days during the first 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Capital Medical University Beijing Tiantan Hospital
    Beijing, 100070, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Girard TD, Alhazzani W, Kress JP, Ouellette DR, Schmidt GA, Truwit JD, Burns SM, Epstein SK, Esteban A, Fan E, Ferrer M, Fraser GL, Gong MN, Hough CL, Mehta S, Nanchal R, Patel S, Pawlik AJ, Schweickert WD, Sessler CN, Strom T, Wilson KC, Morris PE; ATS/CHEST Ad Hoc Committee on Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Adults. An Official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline: Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults. Rehabilitation Protocols, Ventilator Liberation Protocols, and Cuff Leak Tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):120-133. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2075ST. PubMed 27762595 ↗
  • Janssen ML, Weller D, Endeman H, Heunks LM, Wils EJ. Physiological Effects of High-Flow Tracheal Oxygen in Tracheostomized Patients Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Care. 2024 Sep 26;69(10):1336-1344. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11755. PubMed 38772682 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — through clinical trials

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07257016
Lead sponsor
Capital Medical University
Responsible party
Chen Guangqiang (Principal Investigator, Capital Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 2, 2025
Start date
Dec 15, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2026
Completion
Apr 28, 2026
Last update
May 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion