ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07251777PRODONARUpdated Nov 26, 2025

Prone vs Supine Position in Potential Organ Donors: Multicenter Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Prone position in Prone Position, Donors and Lung Procurement, sponsored by Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría. Completed at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Jan 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
254
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background and justification: In Argentina, 9,650 people are on the organ transplant waiting list, including 290 who require a lung transplant. In 2022, 21 unilateral lungs, 18 bilateral lungs, and one cardiopulmonary block were implanted, representing only 1.9% of all transplants. Maintaining organ viability in potential donors (PD) is challenging because brain death triggers adrenergic activation, hemodynamic instability, and atelectasis due to mechanical ventilation and loss of respiratory muscle activity. These factors impair gas exchange and reduce the number of lungs suitable for transplantation.

Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, minimize risks of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and maintain adequate gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Strategies derived from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) include recruitment maneuvers, which may cause complications. In contrast, prone positioning improves ventilation-perfusion matching and increases functional lung parenchyma.

This study proposes prone positioning as a preventive ventilatory strategy to optimize lung preservation in organ donors.

Objectives: (1) Determine whether early prone positioning after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. (2) Evaluate its effect on the availability of other transplantable organs and on hemodynamic stability.

Methods: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial conducted in 10 intensive care units (ICUs) across Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to standard care (supine) or prone positioning following BD certification. Eligible donors will be those with confirmed BD, meeting multi-organ donation criteria, and without documented opposition to donation. Exclusion criteria include contraindications to prone positioning. Donors will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and proning exceeds 12 hours, if more than 20% of data for key variables are missing, or if clinical conditions require returning to the supine position.

The primary outcome is the number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary outcomes include the number of organs transplanted, vasopressor requirements, and variables related to gas exchange and respiratory mechanics.

Read the detailed description

This protocol follows the SPIRIT guidelines (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials).

Introduction: Organ transplantation replaces a failing organ with one from a donor. Ablation enables organ removal for therapeutic use in recipients with terminal organ failure. In Argentina, as of February 2023, 9,650 people were on the national waiting list, including 290 requiring lung transplantation. In 2022, 767 real donors generated 2,090 organs, of which only 40 lungs were transplanted, representing 1.9% of all transplants.

The lung remains one of the most challenging organs for procurement due to strict selection criteria and rapid functional deterioration after brain death (BD). Countries such as Spain, which lead global donation rates, have broadened donor criteria ("expanded criteria donors"), demonstrating that the use of marginal lungs does not increase recipient mortality.

Following BD, sympathetic nervous system activation triggers a massive inflammatory response leading to endothelial and alveolar damage. Potential donors (PDs) under invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) experience additional inflammatory stress. Neuromuscular paralysis and a lack of respiratory effort promote atelectasis, particularly in dependent lung regions, thereby compromising ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. The apnea test and FiO₂ 100% exposure can worsen atelectasis through nitrogen washout. In addition, an absent cough reflex predisposes to secretion retention and infection, reducing lung viability and secondarily impairing the function of other organs through systemic hypoxia and inflammation.

Rationale: Ventilatory management in PDs aims to preserve lung function, reduce IMV-induced injury, and maintain optimal gas exchange while preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension. Lung-protective ventilation (tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure, PEEP) remains standard; however, the proportion of suitable lungs for procurement remains low.

Recruitment maneuvers, formerly used in ARDS, are now avoided due to their association with increased mortality (ART trial, 2018). In turn, prone positioning (PP) has proven several clinical benefits in ARDS, enhancing oxygenation and reducing ventilator-induced lung injury. PP promotes more homogeneous ventilation, recruits dorsal lung areas, enhances oxygenation, and improves right ventricular function without significant hemodynamic compromise. Studies such as PROSEVA demonstrated reduced cardiac arrests and better extrapulmonary organ function in PP patients.

In PDs, PP could similarly improve oxygenation and hemodynamics, facilitating donor management and increasing organ suitability. The PRODON-AR study will test whether PP after BD certification increases the proportion of lungs suitable for transplantation compared with standard supine positioning (SP).

Primary objective: Evaluate whether early PP after BD certification increases the number of lungs meeting suitability criteria for transplantation. Secondary objective: Assess the effect of PP on hemodynamic stability and on the availability of other transplantable organs.

Methods

Design: The PRODON-AR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted across 11 intensive care units (ICUs) in Argentina. Recruitment began on June 1, 2023, and will continue until 250 PDs are enrolled. Participants will be randomized to PP (intervention) or SP (control). Randomization will be electronic and unblinded.

Inclusion criteria: confirmed BD according to national protocol, eligibility for multi-organ donation, and no documented opposition to donation.

Exclusion criteria: contraindications to PP (e.g., spinal instability, major abdominal wounds). PDs will be excluded from analysis if the interval between BD certification and PP exceeds 12 h, more than 20% of key variable data are missing, or if medical conditions require return to SP.

Procedure: After BD certification, ventilation will be set in VC-CMV mode with tidal volume 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, PEEP 8-12 cmH₂O, respiratory rate to maintain PaCO₂ 35-45 mmHg, FiO₂ for SpO₂ 94-98%, and inspiratory time 0.8-1.0 s.

Baseline evaluation (in SP) includes:

  • Chest X-ray or CT for infiltrates,
  • Respiratory mechanics (peak, plateau, total PEEP, ΔP, compliance, resistance),
  • Optional lung ultrasound for aeration scoring,
  • Arterial blood gas (PaO₂/FiO₂, base excess, bicarbonate, SpO₂),
  • Vasopressor requirement (μg/kg/min),
  • Intra-abdominal pressure (mmHg) and urine output (mL/h).

After baseline, PDs will be randomized to PP or SP. Those assigned to PP will be turned following institutional protocols. Reassessment will occur 8-12 h after randomization and again before organ procurement. Complications will be recorded. In the PP group, the donor remains prone until preparation for surgery, with head and limb repositioning every 3 h. For procurement, all donors are returned to SP before transfer to the operating room.

Outcomes Primary: number of lungs suitable for transplantation. Secondary: number of organs transplanted, PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio, respiratory mechanics, vasopressor requirement, and hemodynamic variables.

Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics (mean, median, SD, IQR) will summarize continuous variables. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages.

Inferential analysis:

Primary outcome: logistic regression assessing the association between PP and lung suitability, adjusted for age, sex, time from BD to PP, and comorbidities (odds ratio with 95% CI).

Secondary outcomes: group comparisons via t-test/ANOVA or Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis as appropriate. P\<0.05 will indicate significance. Subgroup analysis will explore the effect of PP timing and presence of atelectasis. Analyses will use JASP (version 2021).

Sample Size: Based on a 6% baseline lung suitability rate (per INCUCAI data), 10% expected improvement, α=0.05, power=80%, and 10% anticipated loss, a total of 250 PDs (125/group) will be required using Student's t-test for proportions.

Ethics: The trial addresses the critical shortage of transplantable lungs in Argentina. Evidence for PP benefits in critical care is robust, yet data in PDs after BD remain scarce. The study involves deceased individuals with certified BD under national law (Laws 17.132, 25.326, 26.629, 27.447, and Decree 1089/2012), posing no risk to living persons. In turn, this study was officially reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Health of Argentina, managed by the research ethics committee (REC) of INCUCAI (INSTITUTO NACIONAL CENTRAL ÚNICO COORDINADOR DE ABLACIÓN E IMPLANTE), under the reference number EX-2024-43540732-APN-INCUCAI#MS.

All data will be anonymized per data protection regulations. Inclusion of deceased donors does not require informed consent (Law 27.447, Chapter VIII; CIOMS Guideline 10 exception). The study does not interfere with organ procurement and relies on standard clinical measurements already documented in SINTRA (National Information System for Procurement and Transplantation).

Biological samples are limited to routine blood and urine analyses and discarded immediately after testing. No genetic studies or material storage are planned. Each site is led by an experienced transplant professional. The principal investigator has extensive experience in donor management and research coordination.

Confidentiality: All participant data will remain confidential. Only anonymized and authorized information will be used for analysis and publication.

Results Publication Policy: Findings will be submitted to high-impact journals and shared with the Argentine Societies of Medicine, Intensive Care, and Transplantation. Ethical and legal publication standards, including conflict-of-interest disclosure, will be strictly followed.

Conflict of Interest: The investigators declare no conflicts of interest.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prone Position
  • Donors
  • Lung Procurement
  • Tissue Donors
  • Lung Transplantation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Prone position
  • Donors
  • Lung procurement
  • Tissue donors
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Brain Death
  • Lung Transplantation
03

In context

Brain Death

74 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Death; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 254 is above the median of 154 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Brain Death.

Browse Brain Death studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who died under neurological criteria
  • 18 to 70 years of age
  • Meet multi-organ donor criteria
  • That they have no opposition to the donation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have expressly stated that they do not donate organs
  • Patients who, for some reason, cannot establish a prone position
  • Deceased with for organ donation.

Elimination criteria

  • Time between diagnosis of ME and prone greater than 12 hours
  • Loss of more than 20% of data on main variables.
  • Require changing a patient from the prone to the supine position for any reason
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
254 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prone position

    Potential donors assigned to the experimental group will be placed in a prone position. This position will be maintained until one hour prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation.

    Procedure: Prone position

  • No intervention
    Supine position

    Potential donors assigned to the control group (supine position) will continue in that position with the usual treatment.

Interventions

  • ProcedureProne position

    The only intervention that differs between the groups will be that the potential donors assigned to the experimental group will be kept in a prone position until they enter the operating room for ablation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Potential lung donor

    Before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation, it will be determined whether the individual is eligible to be a lung donor based on the criteria established by the Spanish Transplant Society

    Time frame: The assessment will be conducted within 1 hour before the potential donor enters the operating room for organ ablation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Organs ablated and implanted

    The organs ablated from each subject will be recorded, as well as which of them were actually implanted in a recipient.

    Time frame: Data will be collected from the INCUCAI website up to 2 days post-ablation, following the procedure

  2. Vasopressor requirement

    The requirement for vasopressor drugs will be recorded, including the specific drug(s) used and the dose administered, expressed in mcg/kg/min.

    Time frame: The vasopressor requirement will be evaluated at three time points: 1. Immediately after the diagnosis of brain death (BD) 2. At 12 hours after the diagnosis of BD 3. Prior to entering the operating room for organ ablation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
    Monte Grande, Buenos Aires 1842, Argentina
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586. PubMed 23303884 ↗
  • Maciel CB, Greer DM. ICU Management of the Potential Organ Donor: State of the Art. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Sep;16(9):86. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0682-1. PubMed 27498101 ↗
  • Del Rio F, Escudero D, De La Calle B, Vidal FG, Paredes MV, Nunez JR. [Evaluation and maintenance of the lung donor]. Med Intensiva. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/s0210-5691(09)70304-3. Spanish. PubMed 19232208 ↗
  • Meyfroidt G, Gunst J, Martin-Loeches I, Smith M, Robba C, Taccone FS, Citerio G. Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality. Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;45(3):343-353. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05551-y. Epub 2019 Feb 11. PubMed 30741327 ↗
  • Bansal R, Esan A, Hess D, Angel LF, Levine SM, George T, Raoof S. Mechanical ventilatory support in potential lung donor patients. Chest. 2014 Jul;146(1):220-227. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2745. PubMed 25010965 ↗
  • Writing Group for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators; Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura EA, Laranjeira LN, Paisani DM, Damiani LP, Guimaraes HP, Romano ER, Regenga MM, Taniguchi LNT, Teixeira C, Pinheiro de Oliveira R, Machado FR, Diaz-Quijano FA, Filho MSA, Maia IS, Caser EB, Filho WO, Borges MC, Martins PA, Matsui M, Ospina-Tascon GA, Giancursi TS, Giraldo-Ramirez ND, Vieira SRR, Assef MDGPL, Hasan MS, Szczeklik W, Rios F, Amato MBP, Berwanger O, Ribeiro de Carvalho CR. Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171. PubMed 28973363 ↗
  • Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23688302 ↗
  • Vieillard-Baron A, Charron C, Caille V, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Prone positioning unloads the right ventricle in severe ARDS. Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1440-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1013. Epub 2007 Oct 9. PubMed 17925425 ↗
  • Matejovic M, Rokyta R Jr, Radermacher P, Krouzecky A, Sramek V, Novak I. Effect of prone position on hepato-splanchnic hemodynamics in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Dec;28(12):1750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1524-y. Epub 2002 Oct 26. PubMed 12447518 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2023 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 18 months.

Of 14 interventional studies with no phase under Brain Death, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 52. This study's 18 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 26, 2024
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
May 1, 2025
Last update
Nov 26, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07251777
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría
Collaborators
Hospital Cuenca Alta Néstor Kirchner Cañuelas, Hospital Escuela General José Francisco de San Martín (Corrientes), Hospital Ángel Cruz Padilla (Tucuman), Hospital Central de Mendoza, Hospital Simplemente Evita de Gonzalez Catan, HIGA Abraham Piñeyro, Hospital San Martín (Entre Ríos), Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos San Roque, Hospital Regional Dr. Enrique Vera Barros (La Rioja), Instituto Nacional Central Único Coordinador de Ablación e Implante
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
May 1, 2025
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Pablo Centeno, Dr.
principal investigator · Hospital de Alta Complejidad del Bicentenario Esteban Echeverría

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion