CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07251205Updated Nov 26, 2025

Evaluating a Culinary Curriculum Program for Residents of Medication Assisted Therapy (MAT) Recovery Houses

An interventional study of Culinary curriculum in Cooking Skills, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Nov 2025).
  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to assess a culinary curriculum in persons with substance use disorder who are receiving medication assisted therapy and who are in recovery residences in Texas. The curriculum has the goal of increasing nutritional knowledge and confidence in cooking skills.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cooking Skills
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Persons with a substance use disorder in Texas

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give consent
  • Does not speak English or Spanish
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Culinary curriculum

    Behavioral: Culinary curriculum

Interventions

  • BehavioralCulinary curriculum

    The curriculum has the goal of increasing nutritional knowledge and confidence in cooking skills, and it will introduce the fundamentals of cooking techniques in 5 weekly sessions. The curriculum includes introductions to cooking equipment and safety in the kitchen (basic knife skills), carbohydrate dishes, seasonal vegetables and making simple salad dressing and salads, cooking techniques (grilling, baking, and pan-frying), cooking with varying proteins, the importance of timing and organization in the kitchen, bite-size desserts, the importance of small portions, and different cultural cuisines. Additionally, the curriculum will help participants establish goals related to incorporating new ingredients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dietary intake as assessed by an abbreviated version of the Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) developed by the Nutrition Incentive Hub

    The Abbreviated Dietary Screener Questionnaire (DSQ) asks how often in the past month different foods were eaten, for each of 9 different types of foods. For each of the 9 types of foods, data are reported categorically as follows: Never; 1 time per month; 2-3 times per month; 1 time per week ; 2 times per week; 3-4 times per week; 5-6 times per week; 1 time per day; 2 -3 times per day; 4-5 times per day; or 6 or more times per day.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

  2. Motivation to eat healthy foods as assessed by the Regulation of Eating Behavior Scale (REBS) Adapted

    Total score on the Regulation of Eating Behavior Scale (REBS) Adapted ranges from 12 to 84, with a higher score indicating greater motivation to eat healthy foods.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

  3. Cooking skill self-efficacy scale as assessed by the Culinary Efficacy Scale

    Total score on the Culinary Efficacy Scale ranges from 24 to 120, with a higher score indicating greater confidence in performing cooking skills.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Body Mass Index (BMI) as assessed by a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device

    Body mass index will be measured using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device designed for use with children and adults.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

  2. Percent Body Fat (PBF) as assessed by a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device

    Percent Body Fat (PBF) will be measured using a bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) device designed for use with children and adults.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

  3. Skin Carotenoid Level as assessed by the Veggie Meter

    Skin Carotenoid Level will be assessed using the Veggie Meter®, which utilizes spectroscopy to quantify the concentration of carotenoids present in the skin. Carotenoids are not synthesized internally and are only obtainable through food; therefore, skin carotenoid levels can be used to detect an increase or decrease in fruit and vegetable intake over time. The VeggieMeter reports a score ranging from 0 to 800, with a higher score indicating higher skin carotenoid stores.

    Time frame: baseline, 5 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pelletier, LG, Dion, SC, Slovinec-D'Angelo, M et al. Why Do You Regulate What You Eat? Relationships Between Forms of Regulation, Eating Behaviors, Sustained Dietary Behavior Change, and Psychological Adjustment. Motivation and Emotion. 2004; 28: 245-277.
  • Condrasky MD, Williams JE, Catalano PM, Griffin SF. Development of psychosocial scales for evaluating the impact of a culinary nutrition education program on cooking and healthful eating. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Nov-Dec;43(6):511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.09.013. Epub 2011 Aug 15. PubMed 21840764 ↗
  • Karelis AD, Chamberland G, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Duval C; Ecological mobility in Aging and Parkinson (EMAP) group. Validation of a portable bioelectrical impedance analyzer for the assessment of body composition. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013 Jan;38(1):27-32. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2012-0129. Epub 2013 Jan 1. PubMed 23368825 ↗
  • Di Noia J, Gellermann W. Use of the Spectroscopy-Based Veggie Meter(R) to Objectively Assess Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-Income Adults. Nutrients. 2021 Jun 30;13(7):2270. doi: 10.3390/nu13072270. PubMed 34209048 ↗
  • May K, Jilcott Pitts S, Stage VC, Kelley CJ, Burkholder S, Fang X, Zeng A, Lazorick S. Use of the Veggie Meter(R) as a tool to objectively approximate fruit and vegetable intake among youth for evaluation of preschool and school-based interventions. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020 Dec;33(6):869-875. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12755. Epub 2020 Apr 12. PubMed 32281191 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07251205
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Responsible party
J. Michael Wilkerson (Associate Professor, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
Start date
Aug 11, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Michael Wilkerson, PhD
Contact
Johnny.M.Wilkerson@uth.tmc.edu
(713) 500-9974
Estevan R Herrera, BSMT
Contact
Estevan.R.Herrera@uth.tmc.edu
(713) 500-9006
Michael Wilkerson, PhD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion