CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07250568Updated Nov 26, 2025

Office Program Effects on Pain, Posture, Muscle Physiology, Stress, Ergonomics, and Quality of Life in LBP Workers

An interventional study of Exercise and Education in Low Back Pain, sponsored by Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa. Recruiting at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 58 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-26.

Sponsored by Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 58 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This interventional study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an office worker's program in reducing low back pain and improving physical and psychosocial outcomes among office employees. The primary objective is to determine the effects of the intervention on pain, lumbar posture, muscle physiology (including core stability, flexibility, fatigue, and endurance), ergonomics, stress levels, and quality of life across different intervention groups.

Participants will be assigned to one of three groups:

Group 1: Exercise program, posture education, and standing advice Group 2: Posture education and standing advice Group 3: standing advice only The study will compare outcomes between groups to identify which combination of interventions provides the greatest benefits for office workers with a tendency to experience low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Research question: Is there any effect of office worker's program on pain intensity, lumbar posture, muscle physiology, ergonomics, stress and quality of life among office workers with low back pain? Research objective: To determine the effect of office worker's program on pain intensity, lumbar posture, muscle physiology, ergonomics, stress and quality of life Research hypothesis: There is significance different on pain intensity, lumbar posture, muscle physiology, ergonomics, stress and quality of life

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Office Workers
  • Ergonomics
  • Exercise Intervention
  • Posture Education
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 58 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Identified LBP
  2. Age between 18 - 60 years old
  3. In the office, working in front computer/laptop minimum along 4 hours per day
  4. Able to ambulate independently with or without walking aids
  5. Controlled comorbidity e.g. DM, HPT, managed asthma and controlled thyroid conditions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recumbent
  2. Cancer, spinal fracture, neurological disorder (stroke, PBI and soon)
  3. Participation in a current fitness program designed to prevent LBP recurrence
  4. Spinal operation within the last six months
  5. Pregnant
  6. Medication (steroid therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, muscle relaxants, antidepressants or anxiolytics)
  7. Insufficient to finish outcome measurements and exercise program
  8. Participants who do not attend 3 consecutive weeks or 8 consecutive times
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exercise Group

    Participants in this arm will receive a structured exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist, combined with posture education using an illustrated poster and regular standing advice. The exercise program consists of progressive abdominal and lumbar strengthening exercises performed 3 times per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes.

    Behavioral: Exercise · Behavioral: Education · Behavioral: Advice

  • Active comparator
    Education Group

    Participants in this arm will receive posture education supported by an illustrated poster and regular standing advice. No exercise program will be provided to this group.

    Behavioral: Education · Behavioral: Advice

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in this arm will receive standing advice only, without exercise intervention or posture education materials.

    Behavioral: Advice

Interventions

  • BehavioralExercise

    Exercise Program: A structured physiotherapist-supervised exercise program designed to improve core stability, lumbar strength, flexibility, and endurance. The program includes progressive abdominal and lumbar muscle strengthening exercises performed three times per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting approximately 20 minutes. Exercises gradually increase in intensity based on participant tolerance and progression criteria.

  • BehavioralEducation

    An educational ergonomic intervention delivered using an illustrated posture guidance poster. Participants receive instruction on proper sitting posture, workstation alignment, neutral spine position, and strategies to reduce lumbar strain during daily office activities. Education is delivered at baseline with follow-up reminders throughout the 12-week study period.

    Also known as: Poster Education

  • BehavioralAdvice

    A behavioral intervention in which participants are advised to take regular standing breaks to reduce prolonged sitting. Participants are instructed to stand for short intervals periodically during working hours, supported by scheduled reminders. No exercise or posture education materials are included in this intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale for pain

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Participants will rate their average low back pain at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. Changes in NRS scores will be compared across groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Flexible curve to measure Lumbar posture

    Lumbar posture will be assessed using the Flexible Curve method, which measures lumbar curvature by molding a flexible ruler along the participant's lumbar spine. Measurements will be taken in the prone position to assess lumbar extension and in the sitting position to assess lumbar flexion. The molded curve will then be traced onto paper to calculate the lumbar lordosis angle and curvature index. Changes in lumbar curvature values will be compared between groups to determine the effects of the interventions on spinal alignment. The unit of measurement will be degrees.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Sphygmomanometer Pressure Test to measure Core Stability

    Core stability will be assessed using a sphygmomanometer pressure biofeedback test. Participants will be positioned sitting, with the cuff placed behind the lumbar region and inflated to a baseline pressure of 40 mmHg. Changes in pressure during controlled abdominal drawing-in maneuvers will be recorded. Smaller pressure deviations indicate better core muscle activation and stability. Core stability scores will be compared between groups to evaluate the effectiveness of each intervention. The unit of measurement will be millimeters of mercury (mmHg).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Short Form-36 (SF-36) to measure quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, which measures eight health domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status. Changes in SF-36 scores will be compared between groups to determine the impact of the interventions on overall quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) to measure stress

    Stress levels will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), a validated self-report questionnaire that measures the degree to which situations in a participant's life are appraised as stressful. Participants complete the 10-item PSS, with each item scored on a 0-4 scale. Higher total scores indicate higher perceived stress. Changes in PSS scores will be compared between the three study groups to evaluate the effect of the interventions on stress reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA) to measure ergonomics

    Ergonomic risk will be evaluated using the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA), a validated observational tool designed to assess risk factors associated with office workstation setup. The ROSA score is calculated based on chair design, monitor height, keyboard/mouse position, posture, and duration of exposure to each risk factor. Higher scores indicate greater ergonomic risk. Changes in ROSA scores will be compared between groups to determine whether the interventions improve workstation ergonomics and reduce musculoskeletal risk factors.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Lumbar Trunk Muscle Endurance Tests to measure endurance

    Lumbar trunk muscle endurance will be assessed using three standardized endurance tests, the unit of measurement per item will be second: 1. Kraus-Weber Test (Trunk Flexor Endurance): Participants maintain a supported trunk flexion position while time to fatigue is recorded. 2. Sorensen Test (Trunk Extensor Endurance): Participants maintain a horizontal torso position while the pelvis is secured, with hold time recorded. 3. Shirado Test (Abdominal and Lumbar Endurance): Participants perform an isometric abdominal and lumbar hold, and duration until fatigue is measured. Longer hold times indicate better muscle endurance. Changes in endurance times will be compared between groups to determine the effectiveness of the interventions.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) to measure muscle fatigue

    Muscle fatigue will be assessed using surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded from the lumbar extensor muscles during a standardized isometric contraction task. sEMG signals will be analyzed for median frequency (MF) and root mean square (RMS) changes. A decrease in MF and an increase in RMS over time indicate greater muscle fatigue. Differences in sEMG-derived fatigue indicators will be compared between intervention groups to determine the effect of the programs on lumbar muscle fatigue. The unit of measurement will be microvolts (µV).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  8. Sit-and-Reach Test to measure flexibility

    Flexibility will be assessed using the Sit-and-Reach Test, which measures hamstring and lower back flexibility. Participants sit on the floor with legs extended and reach forward along a standardized measurement box. The distance reached (in centimeters) is recorded, with greater reach indicating better flexibility. Changes in Sit-and-Reach scores will be compared between groups to evaluate the effects of the interventions on flexibility. The unit of measurement will be centimeters.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07250568
Lead sponsor
Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa
Collaborators
Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta University
Responsible party
Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa (Supervisor: Zarina Zahari, PhD, University Teknologi MARA; Principal Investigator: Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa, M.Erg, Universiti Teknologi Mara) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
Start date
Mar 23, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 17, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 26, 2025

Study contacts

Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa
Contact
suciwahyuismiyasa@gmail.com
+6285219163441
Zarina Zahari, PhD
Contact
zarinazahari@uitm.edu.my
+6013204170
Suci Wahyu Ismiyasa, M.Erg
principal investigator · Universiti Teknologi Mara
Zarina Zahari, PhD
study director · Universiti Teknologi Mara

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion