CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07248618Updated Nov 25, 2025

Comparison of TTE and LTTBT on Trunk Control, Balance and ADL's in Stroke Patients

An interventional study of Trunk Training Exercises and Lateral Truncal Tilt Balance Training in Stroke, sponsored by Riphah International University. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-25.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Nov 2025).
  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To compare the effects of trunk training exercises and lateral truncal tilt balance training on trunk control, balance and activities of daily living in stroke patients.The primary outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of each training approach will include the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, assessing mobility and fall risk; the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), which measures functional balance; and the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), evaluating trunk control and coordination.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a significant cause of disability globally, affecting millions each year. Stroke patients frequently experience impairments in trunk control and balance, critical factors for independence in activities of daily living (ADLs). Two promising therapeutic approaches include Trunk Training Exercises (TTE) focusing on core stability and Lateral Truncal Tilt Balance Training (LTT), which targets balance and postural alignment through controlled lateral movements. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of these two interventions in improving trunk control, balance, and ADLs in stroke patients, potentially leading to optimized rehabilitation practices. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted at Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Participants aged 40 75, diagnosed with sub-acute stroke, will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A, which will undergo trunk training exercises (TTE), and Group B, which will receive lateral truncal tilt balance training (LTT). Each intervention will last for eight weeks and thrice a week, with a session of 45 minutes including warm-up exercises, main exercises and cool down period during which participants will engage in their respective training regimens. To assess the impact of these interventions, baseline measurements will be taken prior to the intervention and compared to post-intervention results. The primary outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of each training approach will include the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, assessing mobility and fall risk; the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), which measures functional balance; and the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), evaluating trunk control and coordination. Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS software (version 25). To determine the distribution of data, the Shapiro-Wilk Test will be performed. If the data is not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test will be used to analyze within-group differences, while the Mann-Whitney U Test will assess differences between groups at each interval. For normally distributed data, Paired Sample T-tests will compare pre- and post-intervention scores within each group, and Independent Sample T-tests will evaluate changes between groups.

Inclusion criteria is:

Patients with ischemic stroke Both male and females Age 40-75 years Patients diagnosed with sub-acute stroke after six months to 1.5 years of diagnosis Patients able to walk 10 meters independently Score less than 21 on trunk impairment scale Patients with score 24 or more on MMSE

Exclusion criteria is:

Patients with score more than 2 on modified Ashworth scale will be excluded Chronic patients will not be included in the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with ischemic stroke
  • Both male and females
  • Age 40-75 years
  • Patients diagnosed with sub-acute stroke after six months to 1.5 years of diagnosis
  • Patients able to walk 10 meters independently
  • Score less than 21 on trunk impairment scale
  • Patients with score 24 or more on MMSE

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with score more than 2 on modified Ashworth scale will be excluded
  • Chronic patients will not be included in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Trunk Training Exercises

    Core Stabilization Exercises, dynamic trunk exercises, bridging exercises

    Other: Trunk Training Exercises

  • Experimental
    Lateral Truncal Tilt Balance Training

    Seated lateral tilts, Standing Lateral Weight Shifts, balance board tilts, Stability Ball Exercises, lateral Reaches on Unstable Surface

    Other: Lateral Truncal Tilt Balance Training

Interventions

  • OtherTrunk Training Exercises

    Group A will undergo a structured trunk training exercise program focused on strengthening the core muscles involved in trunk control. This program will include both dynamic and static exercises targeting trunk flexion, extension, and rotation, which are critical for improving postural stability and overall trunk coordination. Frequency: Sessions will be conducted three times per week for the duration of 8 weeks. Session Duration: Each session will last approximately 45 minutes, including a warm-up, main exercises, and a cool-down period.

  • OtherLateral Truncal Tilt Balance Training

    Group B will follow a lateral truncal tilt balance training program focusing on balance improvement through lateral stability exercises. This training emphasizes body tilts and weight shifts to encourage trunk control and postural alignment, particularly targeting the common lateral asymmetries observed in stroke patients. Frequency: Sessions will be conducted three times per week for 8 weeks. Session Duration: Each session will last approximately 45 minutes, including warm-up, main exercises, and a cool-down period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Timed up and go test (TUG)

    The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a simple and widely used assessment to evaluate a person's mobility, balance, and risk of falling, particularly in older adults and individuals with neurological conditions like stroke. A time of under 10 seconds is typically considered normal for healthy adults, while times over 12-14 seconds may indicate a higher risk of falls and impaired mobility. It has good validity and reliability ranging from 0.80-0.83

    Time frame: 1-2 min

Secondary outcomes

  1. Berg balance scale (BBS)

    . The scale consists of 14 functional tasks, such as standing from a seated position, reaching forward, standing with eyes closed, and turning 360 degrees. Each task is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 (unable to perform) to 4 (normal performance), yielding a maximum score of 56, with lower scores indicating a greater risk of falling (20).

    Time frame: 15 to 20 min

Other outcomes

  1. Trunk impairment scale (TIS)

    . It includes three subscales: static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination, with scores ranging from 0 to 23 points, where higher scores indicate better trunk stability and coordination

    Time frame: upto 20 min

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Jinnah hospital
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54550, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tu WJ, Wang LD; Special Writing Group of China Stroke Surveillance Report. China stroke surveillance report 2021. Mil Med Res. 2023 Jul 19;10(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00463-x. PubMed 37468952 ↗
  • Murphy SJ, Werring DJ. Stroke: causes and clinical features. Medicine (Abingdon). 2020 Sep;48(9):561-566. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Aug 6. PubMed 32837228 ↗
  • Lee K. The Relationship of Trunk Muscle Activation and Core Stability: A Biomechanical Analysis of Pilates-Based Stabilization Exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 4;18(23):12804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312804. PubMed 34886530 ↗
  • Karthikbabu S, Verheyden G. Relationship between trunk control, core muscle strength and balance confidence in community-dwelling patients with chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Mar;28(2):88-95. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1783896. Epub 2020 Jun 23. PubMed 32574524 ↗
  • Pellicciari L, Sodero A, Campagnini S, Guolo E, Basagni B, Castagnoli C, Hochleitner I, Paperini A, Gnetti B, Avila L, Romano E, Grippo A, Hakiki B, Carrozza MC, Mannini A, Macchi C, Cecchi F. Factors influencing trunk control recovery after intensive rehabilitation in post-stroke patients: a multicentre prospective study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023 Mar;30(2):109-118. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.2016099. Epub 2022 Jan 7. PubMed 34994302 ↗
  • Martins LG, Molle da Costa RD, Alvarez Sartor LC, Thomaz de Souza J, Winckler FC, Regina da Silva T, Modolo GP, Nunes HRC, Bazan SGZ, Martin LC, Luvizutto GJ, Bazan R. Clinical factors associated with trunk control after stroke: A prospective study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Apr;28(3):181-189. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1805244. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32772828 ↗
  • Lee K, Lee D, Hong S, Shin D, Jeong S, Shin H, Choi W, An S, Lee G. The relationship between sitting balance, trunk control and mobility with predictive for current mobility level in survivors of sub-acute stroke. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0251977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251977. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34351943 ↗
  • Sawa K, Amimoto K, Ishigami K, Miyamoto T, Setoyama C, Suzuki R, Nozomi K, Tamura M, Miyagami M. Efficacy of lateral truncal tilt training with a wedge on postural vertical and activities of daily living in recovery phase after stroke: A randomized crossover trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;51(1):33-40. doi: 10.3233/NRE-210255. PubMed 35275567 ↗
  • De Luca A, Squeri V, Barone LM, Vernetti Mansin H, Ricci S, Pisu I, Cassiano C, Capra C, Lentino C, De Michieli L, Sanfilippo CA, Saglia JA, Checchia GA. Dynamic Stability and Trunk Control Improvements Following Robotic Balance and Core Stability Training in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study. Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 17;11:494. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00494. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32625162 ↗
  • Shalash A, Fayed ZY, Hamid E, Radwan H, Nada MA, Eid M, Abdel Ghany WA. Outcome of pallidal stimulation of idiopathic generalized dystonia with predominant mobile truncal dystonia: case report. Int J Neurosci. 2022 May;132(5):429-433. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1818743. Epub 2020 Sep 16. PubMed 32886009 ↗
  • Tamura S, Miyata K, Kobayashi S, Takeda R, Iwamoto H. The minimal clinically important difference in Berg Balance Scale scores among patients with early subacute stroke: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Sep;29(6):423-429. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2021.1943800. Epub 2021 Jun 25. PubMed 34169808 ↗
  • Jin X, Wang L, Liu S, Zhu L, Loprinzi PD, Fan X. The Impact of Mind-body Exercises on Motor Function, Depressive Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010031. PubMed 31861456 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07248618
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 25, 2025
Start date
Oct 17, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 25, 2025

Study contacts

Hafsa Fayyaz, MS-NMPT
Contact
hafsa.fayyaz78690@gamil.com
03229425544
Aruba Saeed, Phd*
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion