ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07237321rPMS-FootUpdated Jun 2, 2026

Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation of Foot Muscles: Effects on Medial Longitudinal Arch Height and Foot Muscle Strength in Adults With Flat Feet

An interventional study of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) in Pes Planus, Flatfoot and Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction, sponsored by University of Ljubljana. Recruiting at 2 sites in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by University of Ljubljana · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study examines the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on foot invertor muscle strength, morphology, and the height of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) in individuals with flat feet. The rPMS will be applied non-invasively to the extrinsic and intrinsic foot muscles three times per week for twelve weeks. The experimental group will receive rPMS targeting the invertor muscles of the foot, while the control group will not receive stimulation but will follow the same measurement schedule.

Assessments will be performed at baseline, after 6 weeks, and after 12 weeks of intervention. The primary outcome will be the change in the height of the MLA, evaluated using dynamic navicular drop assessment during gait. Secondary outcomes will include changes in the isometric inversion torque of the foot invertors and morphological adaptations of the tibialis posterior muscle assessed by ultrasound imaging.

This study seeks to determine whether rPMS can improve the height of the MLA, foot invertor muscle strength and structural stability in adults with flat feet. The findings may contribute to developing new, non-invasive therapeutic approaches for improving foot function and preventing musculoskeletal imbalances related to flat foot deformity.

Read the detailed description

During movement, the role of the foot muscles is often overlooked. Through their strength and stabilizing function, foot muscles play an important role in maintaining balance, posture, and force transmission throughout the body. Proper activation of these muscles also helps preserve the stability of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA), thereby influencing the overall biomechanics of human movement.

The foot muscles are classified as extrinsic (originating outside the foot) and intrinsic (originating and inserting within the foot). Extrinsic muscles, primarily stabilize the ankle joint and control larger movements, whereas intrinsic muscles store and release elastic energy within the foot, contributing to arch support and movement efficiency.

A lowered height or collapsed arch of the foot, known as flat foot (pes planus), is characterized by arch flattening during weight-bearing and affects approximately 13-27% of the adult population. This deformity alters force distribution and shock absorption, increasing mechanical load on the joints and muscles of the lower kinetic chain. Consequently, flat feet are often associated with foot pain, tendinopathies, and different musculoskeletal disorders in the knees, hips, and lumbar spine.

One of the main causes of flat foot deformity is dysfunction of the tibialis posterior (TP) tendon. This dysfunction leads to reduced muscle strength, decreased neuromuscular activation of the foot invertors and plantar flexors, and subsequent lowering of the navicular bone, resulting in a reduced MLA height. Strengthening the m. TP not only maintains arch position but also improves gait efficiency by reducing compensatory activation of other muscles. This muscle is considered as the strongest foot invertor and has the largest moment arm along the subtalar axis.

Recent research highlights that strengthening foot invertor muscles, particularly m. TP, can effectively increase height of the MLA. Conventional interventions include specific exercise programs and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques. However, neuromuscular electrical stimulation used in previous studies did not showed significant increases in MLA height, partly due to pain and discomfort during deep muscle stimulation.

Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) has emerged as a promising non-invasively alternative, capable of stimulating deep neuromuscular structures. Several studies have shown that high-frequency rPMS can induce muscle activation, transient swelling, and potential hypertrophy indicators. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the long-term (multi-week) effects of rPMS on deep muscles such as the m. TP.

Aim of this research is to implement a 12-week rPMS protocol targeting both extrinsic and intrinsic foot invertor muscles, and to examine whether rPMS induces changes in the height of the MLA. Additionally, the study aims to determine whether 12-week rPMS protocol contributed to increased strength and cross-sectional area of the m. TP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pes Planus
  • Flatfoot
  • Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Medial Longitudinal Arch
  • Flatfoot
  • rPMS
  • foot invertors
  • tibialis posterior
  • repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
  • foot
  • posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
  • strength
  • ultrasound
  • muscle cross-sectional area
03

In context

Flatfoot

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 50 years,
  • functionally flat feet of participants.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute leg injuries,
  • diabetes,
  • vascular disorders of the lower limbs,
  • open wounds or skin lesions on the lower leg or foot,
  • participants with metal implants near the stimulation site,
  • cardiac pacemaker,
  • other orthopedic or neurological conditions that could affect the study results or pose a health risk to the participants.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rPMS Stimulation Group

    Subjects in this group will receive repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) of the foot invertor muscles three times per week for 12 weeks. Stimulation will be applied to the upper third of the anteromedial side of the shin. Intrinsic foot muscles will be simultaneously stimulated using a foot stimulator, with the nondominant foot placed on the stimulation platform. Participants in the experimental group will complete ultrasound imaging, navicular drop assessment, clinical evaluation of the plantar arch index, and isometric strength testing of the foot invertor muscles at three time points: before the intervention (baseline), after 6 weeks, and after 12-week stimulation period.

    Device: Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS)

  • No intervention
    Control Group (no stimulation)

    Subjects in control group will not receive any stimulation but will undergo the same measurement procedures as the experimental group, including ultrasound imaging, navicular drop assessment, clinical evaluation of the plantar arch index, and isometric strength testing of the foot invertor muscles before and after the 6- and 12-week period.

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS)

    Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) will be applied to the foot invertor muscles three times per week for 12 weeks. Stimulation will target the upper third of the anteromedial side of the shin, near the tibia, using an oval magnetic coil. To ensure correct coil placement, visible muscle contraction and ankle inversion will be monitored. Intrinsic foot muscles will be simultaneously stimulated using a foot stimulator, with the nondominant foot positioned on the stimulation platform. Participants will perform isometric inversion contractions during rPMS to enhance neuromuscular activation and short-foot exercises to engage local foot stabilizers.

    Also known as: Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation, rPMS, FMS, Functional Magnetic Stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in medial longitudinal arch height

    Measuring dynamic navicular drop assessment during the stance phase of gait.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 6, Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in isometric inversion torque of the stimulated foot

    Measured using an special designed isometric device to assess maximal voluntary torque during foot inversion in subtalar exis.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 6, Week 12

Other outcomes

  1. Change in cross-sectional area of the tibialis posterior muscle

    Measured using ultrasound imaging to evaluate morphological adaptations of the tibialis posterior muscle and/or other foot invertor muscles.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Week 6, Week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
    Not yet recruiting
  • Faculty of Sports
    Ljubljana, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zschorlich V, Yamaguchi T, Schneider C. Editorial: The use of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in neurological disorders and neurorehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 20;14:1324882. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1324882. eCollection 2023. No abstract available. PubMed 38053798 ↗
  • Hirono T, Ikezoe T, Taniguchi M, Nojiri S, Tanaka H, Ichihashi N. Acute effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation following low-intensity isometric exercise on muscle swelling for selective muscle in healthy young men. Electromagn Biol Med. 2021 Jul 3;40(3):420-427. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2021.1907402. Epub 2021 Mar 25. PubMed 33764250 ↗
  • Masse-Alarie H, Flamand VH, Moffet H, Schneider C. Peripheral neurostimulation and specific motor training of deep abdominal muscles improve posturomotor control in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2013 Sep;29(9):814-23. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318276a058. PubMed 23370067 ↗
  • Neugebauer R. [Surgical treatment of colon cancer. 4. Preoperative preparation of the colon]. Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop. 1979;(10):38-40. No abstract available. German. PubMed 32789 ↗
  • Baek J, Park N, Lee B, Jee S, Yang S, Kang S. Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Over Vastus Lateralis in Patients After Hip Replacement Surgery. Ann Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb;42(1):67-75. doi: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.1.67. Epub 2018 Feb 28. PubMed 29560326 ↗
  • Yang SS, Jee S, Hwang SL, Sohn MK. Strengthening of Quadriceps by Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation in Healthy Subjects. PM R. 2017 Aug;9(8):767-773. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Jan 8. PubMed 28082179 ↗
  • Aenumulapalli A, Kulkarni MM, Gandotra AR. Prevalence of Flexible Flat Foot in Adults: A Cross-sectional Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):AC17-AC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26566.10059. Epub 2017 Jun 1. PubMed 28764143 ↗
  • Kelly LA, Farris DJ, Cresswell AG, Lichtwark GA. Intrinsic foot muscles contribute to elastic energy storage and return in the human foot. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Jan 1;126(1):231-238. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00736.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 21. PubMed 30462568 ↗
  • Beaulieu LD, Schneider C. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation to reduce pain or improve sensorimotor impairments: A literature review on parameters of application and afferents recruitment. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep;45(3):223-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PubMed 26363684 ↗
  • Ross MH, Smith MD, Mellor R, Vicenzino B. Exercise for posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials and clinical guidelines. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Sep 19;4(1):e000430. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000430. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30271611 ↗
  • Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Angel JC, Singh D, Haddad F, Livingstone J, Berry G. Tibialis posterior dysfunction: a common and treatable cause of adult acquired flatfoot. BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1328-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1328. No abstract available. PubMed 15576744 ↗
  • Jia Y, Sai X, Zhang E. Comparing the efficacy of exercise therapy on adult flexible flatfoot individuals through a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 11;14(1):21186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72149-w. PubMed 39261538 ↗
  • Hegazy F, Aboelnasr E, Abuzaid M, Kim IJ, Salem Y. Comparing Validity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Clarke's Angle and Foot Posture Index-6 to Determine Flexible Flatfoot in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Investigation. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Sep 27;14:2705-2717. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S317439. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34611407 ↗
  • Michaudet C, Edenfield KM, Nicolette GW, Carek PJ. Foot and Ankle Conditions: Pes Planus. FP Essent. 2018 Feb;465:18-23. PubMed 29381041 ↗
  • Dowling GJ, Murley GS, Munteanu SE, Smith MM, Neal BS, Griffiths IB, Barton CJ, Collins NJ. Dynamic foot function as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13047-014-0053-6. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25598843 ↗
  • de Souza TMM, de Oliveira Coutinho VG, Tessutti VD, de Oliveira NRC, Yi LC. Effects of intrinsic foot muscle strengthening on the medial longitudinal arch mobility and function: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Oct;36:89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 Jun 10. PubMed 37949605 ↗
  • Johnson AW, Bruening DA, Violette VA, Perkins KV, Thompson CL, Ridge ST. Ultrasound Imaging Is Reliable for Tibialis Posterior Size Measurements. J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Dec;39(12):2305-2312. doi: 10.1002/jum.15340. Epub 2020 May 15. PubMed 32412115 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All de-identified IPD (demographics, primary and secondary outcome measures) will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: IPD will be available 12 months after publication of the results and will remain available for 5 years.

Access criteria: Researchers will be able to request access to IPD. Access will be granted upon reasonable proposals which will be reviewed and approved by the study investigators. Only de-identified datasets will be shared. Data will be provided electronically.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.fsp.uni-lj.si

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07237321
Lead sponsor
University of Ljubljana
Collaborators
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine
Responsible party
Ales Dolenec (Associate Professor, Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 19, 2025
Start date
Dec 16, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Rok Bavdek, PhD
Contact
rok.bavdek@gimkr.si
0038641866285
Rok Bavdek, PhD
principal investigator
Nejc Umek, MD PhD
study director · Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion