CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07237217Updated Sep 21, 2026Results posted

Guided Group Telehealth to Deliver Evidence-based Therapeutic Care to Black College Students

An interventional study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Coping Skills Training in Anxiety Depression, sponsored by Dr. Veronica Tetterton. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Dr. Veronica Tetterton · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Nov 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to address the mental health crisis among college students by creating a promising solution for group teletherapy, which is equivalent to individual teletherapy in terms of treatment outcomes.The main question it aims to answer is: if participants' outcome measures in TheraGroup are in line with participants' outcome measures in individual therapy. The goal of the current SBIR is to test TheraGroup, the first large scale virtual group platform for evidenced-based mental health therapy. The TheraGroup application addresses the market surge in the demand for care and the shortage of mental health professionals as it represents an economically viable treatment alternative to individual teletherapy.

Read the detailed description

Mental illness among college students has become a public health crisis. Even before the pandemic, many college campuses lacked the resources to support students' mental health needs. College campus counseling centers have begun to think creatively about how to meet the growing demand for services as the number of available therapists is insufficient to treat the number of students seeking help. TheraGroup is the solution to leverage innovative group technology to provide Guided Group Therapy (GGT) in which students receive evidenced-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) coping skills training to address the high demand for mental health services and bridge the gap in services on college campuses. TheraGroup is the first large scale virtual group real-time platform for evidenced-based mental health therapy. TheraGroup is a HIPAA-compliant, platform-agnostic tool that provides the channel through which GGT will be facilitated to service college students to improve student mental health outcomes. In Aim 1, researchers will develop the TheraGroup platform. Researchers will achieve this by optimizing the existing platform, which is therapy enabled for one-to-one therapy, to enable one-to-many communication in a large group context. In addition, researchers will develop other proprietary features that create an anonymous and interactive group discussion experience. The proof of concept will be demonstrated with high usage across multiple devices. In Aim 2, researchers will implement a feasibility study to assess the impact of GGT via TheraGroup on measures of engagement, user experience, and mental health outcomes in college students. If participants' outcome measures in the GGT group are in line with participants' outcome measures in the IT group, the feasibility study will serve as a precursor to testing the effects of GGT via TheraGroup using a larger scale randomized control trial. Achieving these aims could suggest TheraGroup is a new actionable tool to supplement existing mental health interventions to address the ever-growing need for mental health services college students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Depression

Keywords

  • mental health
  • college students
  • asynchronous group therapy
03

In context

Psychological Well-Being

971 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychological Well-Being; 502 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 116 across 830 interventional studies indexed under Psychological Well-Being.

Browse Psychological Well-Being studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr. Veronica Tetterton as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals at PVAMU 18 years and older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals younger than 18 years of age will be excluded from the clinical trial.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Guided Group Therapy (GGT) via TheraGroup

    Participants in the GGT group will receive the same psychoeducational information and reading resources about the CBT coping skills and encouragement of reflection on homework assignments in a group online chat environment. Participants in GGT will also receive support in the form of direct asynchronous communication with the therapist and asynchronous communication with peers struggling with similar issues.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Coping Skills Training

  • Active comparator
    Individual Teletherapy (IT)

    Participants in the IT group will receive 1 one 1 teletherapy using the 12-week structured modules. The therapist will be providing psychoeducational information and reading resources about the CBT coping skills and encouragement of reflection on homework assignments in session (via video, audio or text therapy).

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Coping Skills Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Coping Skills Training

    12 Week CBT Coping Skills Training Modules

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Engagement (8-item Scale)

    Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Engagement (8-item Scale)

    Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Engagement (8-item Scale)

    Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 12

  5. Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 8

  6. Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 4

  7. Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

    Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  9. Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 4

  10. Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 8

  11. Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Completion Rate

    Out of the 20 participants in each clinical trial arm, this outcome reflects the number of participants who completed the engagement component by Week 12 of the intervention.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. User Feedback Sentiment

    Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 4. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

    Time frame: Week 4

  3. User Feedback Sentiment

    Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 8. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

    Time frame: Week 8

  4. User Feedback Sentiment

    Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 12. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2026

Participant flow

This study will recruit 40 Black college students attending Prairie View A\&M University (PVAMU) who are at least 18 years of age, and who qualify for the clinical intervention based on their current levels of depression and anxiety. Recruitment will occur by distributing flyers to the psychology participant pool, posting flyers around campuses, referrals from the student health center, and through word of mouth.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Started2020
Completed1517
Not completed53

Outcome measures

SecondaryCompletion Rate

Out of the 20 participants in each clinical trial arm, this outcome reflects the number of participants who completed the engagement component by Week 12 of the intervention.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Engagement completers
Completion Rate
Engagement completersGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Completion Rate1517
PrimaryEngagement (8-item Scale)

Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Mean engagement score
Engagement (8-item Scale)
Mean engagement scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Engagement (8-item Scale)3.90 ± .124.62 ± .12
PrimaryEngagement (8-item Scale)

Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · Mean engagement score
Engagement (8-item Scale)
Mean engagement scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Engagement (8-item Scale)4.11 ± .124.70 ± .12
PrimaryEngagement (8-item Scale)

Participant engagement was assessed using a self-report engagement measure administered at post-intervention. Items were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater engagement. Mean engagement scores are reported as scores on a scale. Engagement scores represent the mean of all item responses, yielding a possible score range from 1 to 5.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · Mean engagement score
Engagement (8-item Scale)
Mean engagement scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Engagement (8-item Scale)3.74 ± .124.79 ± .12
PrimaryAnxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · GAD-7 total score
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)
GAD-7 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)7.37 ± 1.124.80 ± 1.31
PrimaryAnxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · GAD-7 total score
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)
GAD-7 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)6.65 ± 1.095.94 ± 1.06
SecondaryUser Feedback Sentiment

Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 4. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
User Feedback Sentiment
scores on a scaleGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
User Feedback Sentiment0.134 (0.044 to 0.170)0.217 (0.100 to 0.365)
SecondaryUser Feedback Sentiment

Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 8. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
User Feedback Sentiment
scores on a scaleGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
User Feedback Sentiment0.38 (0.18 to 0.56)0.45 (0.26 to 0.63)
SecondaryUser Feedback Sentiment

Sentiment was quantified using a continuous sentiment score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more positive sentiment. Sentiment scores were derived from open-ended responses collected at Week 12. Due to non-normal distributions, sentiment scores are summarized using medians and interquartile ranges and are reported as scores on a scale.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Median · scores on a scale
User Feedback Sentiment
scores on a scaleGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
User Feedback Sentiment0.39 (0.281 to 0.476)0.393 (0.255 to 0.476)
PrimaryAnxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · GAD-7 total score
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)
GAD-7 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)5.91 ± 1.157.06 ± 1.04
PrimaryAnxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · GAD-7 total score
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)
GAD-7 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)10.00 ± 0.908.85 ± 0.93
PrimaryDepressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · PHQ-9 total score
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)10.20 ± 1.0410.55 ± 0.96
PrimaryDepressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · PHQ-9 total score
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)8.10 ± 1.177.01 ± 1.11
PrimaryDepressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · PHQ-9 total score
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)6.05 ± 1.157.17 ± 1.13
PrimaryDepressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)

Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a 9-item self-report measure. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Item responses are summed to compute a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · PHQ-9 total score
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)
PHQ-9 total scoreGuided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)
Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9)6.78 ± 1.175.58 ± 1.30

Adverse events

Collected over From enrollment until completion of the study, up to 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics include all participants enrolled and assigned to a study arm at baseline prior to receipt of intervention. All enrolled participants who completed baseline assessments are included. Differences between baseline Ns and Ns reported for outcome analyses reflect attrition and missing data at follow-up timepoints.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Guided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years202040
>=65 years000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Guided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American202040
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Guided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)Total
Female181937
Male213
PHQ-9 total score at baseline
PHQ-9 total score at baseline(points)Guided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)Total
Mean10.38 ± 4.4210.38 ± 4.4210.38 ± 4.42
GAD-7 total score at baseline
GAD-7 total score at baseline(Points)Guided Group Therapy (GGT) Via TheraGroupIndividual Teletherapy (IT)Total
Mean9.43 ± 4.109.43 ± 4.109.43 ± 4.10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • PVAMU
    Prairie View, Texas 77446, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and informed consent form · Jan 31, 2025
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 10, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — For confidentiality purposes.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07237217
Lead sponsor
Dr. Veronica Tetterton
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
Responsible party
Dr. Veronica Tetterton (Principal Investigator, The Sweet I AM) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 19, 2025
Start date
Sep 22, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2025
Completion
Aug 31, 2025
Results posted
Feb 23, 2026
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion