ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07222930Updated Jun 24, 2026

Learning Amyloid and Tau Results

An observational study in Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240
Ages
45 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, single-cohort, single-center, observational study to assess if learning one's Alzheimer's disease biomarker test result impacts longitudinal psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and to identify factors that moderate and mediate these outcomes. Participants enrolled in this study are requested to complete surveys at four timepoints after learning their Alzheimer's biomarker test results.

Read the detailed description

The overall objective is to determine how learning one's amyloid and tau test results impacts longitudinal psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and identify factors that moderate and mediate these outcomes.

The rationale is that by understanding factors that explain variability in reactions, biomarker communication and post-testing support can be tailored to optimize outcomes.

The central hypothesis is that learning biomarker profile will affect psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and that these outcomes will be moderated by social determinants of health (SDOH) and perceived communication factors and mediated by illness perceptions and beliefs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

  • Amyloid
  • Tau
  • Alzheimer's Risk
  • dementia
  • biomarker testing
  • risk
  • pathophysiological changes
  • communication
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 200 across 814 observational studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,188 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 157 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

240 participants aged 50-89 who are cognitively unimpaired or have mild cognitive impairment will be enrolled from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention, Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Clinical Core, or other studies affiliated with the UW Alzheimer's Research Program.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Willing to provide .
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
  • Individuals at least 45 years of age.
  • Enrolled in Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) or Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Clinical Core (ADRC)
  • Previously adjudicated as cognitively unimpaired having mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or impaired but do not meet diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment or dementia (classified as "Impaired-Not MCI" by the WRAP and ADRC cohorts) at their last WRAP or ADRC study visit at the time of enrollment into this study
  • Have completed or able to complete amyloid and/or tau PET scans as part of a UW Alzheimer's Research Study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of dementia at the time of enrollment as determined by the most recent parent WRAP/ADRC study visit diagnostic consensus conference using standard NIA-AA 2011 diagnostic criteria. Participants who develop dementia after enrolling into this study may remain enrolled if they maintain decisional capacity and are able to follow study instructions and procedures.
  • Individuals who lack decisional capacity to provide as determined by significant difficulty in understanding materials and information about study procedures during recruitment and/or informed consent discussions.
  • Not suitable for study participation due to other reasons at the discretion of the investigators.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants from UW Alzheimer's Disease Research

    Participants aged 50-89 who are cognitively unimpaired or have mild cognitive impairment will be enrolled from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention, Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Clinical Core, or other studies affiliated with the UW Alzheimer's Research Program.

    Other: Disclose amyloid, tau results · Other: Follow-up Assessments

Interventions

  • OtherDisclose amyloid, tau results

    Release of results from investigational agents conducted under IND 107114, IND 166860, and IND 134516

  • OtherFollow-up Assessments

    self-report psychosocial and behavioral questionnaires

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact of Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease (INI-AD) Score

    Test-related distress will be assessed using the INI-AD instrument. Score range from 0-80 where higher scores indicate increased negative impact of test.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  2. Stigma Impact Scale (SIS) Score

    Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree (4) to strongly disagree (1), and a fifth option of "not applicable" with higher total scores (24-96) indicating higher perceived stigma.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  3. Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization, and Pleasure (CASP-12)

    This is a quality of life measure scored from 0-36 where higher scores mean better quality of life.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  4. Future Time Perspective Scale

    Scores are from 1-7 where higher scores indicate higher engagement.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Willingness to Prevent AD

    Willingness to seek clinical evaluation about brain health and AD risk will be assessed by the Willingness to Prevent AD Scale, 12 items on a 5-point scale are scored from 12-60 where higher numbers indicate an increased willingness to prevent AD. A sum score (or projected/comparable sum score for participants who complete less than 12 items) for items answered will be calculated as the mean multiplied by the total number of available items, to be comparable between participants who answer a different number of items.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  2. Willingness to Prevent AD: Over the counter, prescription, clinical trial items

    Willingness to seek clinical evaluation about brain health and AD risk will also be assessed using 3 additional items added to the instrument, scored on a 5-point scale from 3-15 where higher numbers indicate an increased willingness to prevent AD.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  3. Exercise Vital Sign Tool: Minutes per Week of Moderate or Vigorous Exercise

    Engagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed using the exercise vital sign tool. This is self-reported as number of days per week and average minutes per day of moderate to vigorous exercise (like a brisk walk). The number of days per week is multiplied by average minutes per day to compute the outcome of minutes per week of moderate or vigorous physical activity. .

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  4. Cognitive & Leisure Activity Scale (CLAS)

    Engagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed by the CLAS scale, scored from 0-80 where higher scores means increased participation in cognitive and leisure activities.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  5. 6-item questionnaire for Mediterranean diet

    Engagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed with the 6-item questionnaire for Mediterranean diet. Scores range from 0-6 with higher scores more closely resembling a Mediterranean dietary pattern.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  6. Brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI)

    Engagement in health behaviors or willingness to engage in brain health behaviors, clinical trials, or treatments will in part be assessed using the B-PSQI, scored from 0-15 where higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  7. Number of Participants who Complete Advanced Directives

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  8. Clinical Trial Enrollment

    Clinical trial enrollment will be assessed using an item from the Willingness to Prevent AD survey that inquires about willingness and actual enrollment in clinical trials. Answers include: "will not do", "have not considered", "considered, but have not decided", "ready, will do", and "already did".

    Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  9. Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) Score

    Communication will be assessed at the 1-month follow-up timepoint using CAT, scored from 15 to 75 where higher scores indicate better reported communication.

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be stored and shared back with the larger source studies (Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention and Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center) to allow for investigators to request the data for future analyses.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: De-identified data will be available upon publication of related work or end of the project period, whichever comes first. Data will be preserved for at least five years following the end of the grant period.

Access criteria: De-identified data can be requested by internal and external researchers through data request procedures set by the source studies.

Data sharing details ↗ · wrap.wisc.edu

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07222930
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2025
Start date
Feb 17, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Lindsay Clark, PhD
principal investigator · UW School of Medicine and Public Health

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion