ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07220902LEVMagUpdated Oct 24, 2025

Levetiracetam Compared to Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Eclamptic Seizure

A Phase 3 interventional study of Levetiracetam and magnesium sulfate in Severe Preeclampsia and Eclampsia Preeclampsia, sponsored by Nebraska Methodist Health System. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-24.

Sponsored by Nebraska Methodist Health System · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,240
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to compare levetiracetam to magnesium sulfate for the prevention of eclamptic seizures in pregnant persons with severe preeclampsia that are 32 or more weeks pregnant. This is an equivalence study so our primary goal is to see no difference in the incidence of seizure in the two groups. Since side effects can be a significant problem with magnesium sulfate and these patients are at significant risk of life threatening complications, we also plan to evaluate several secondary outcomes in the mothers and the babies, including:

severe allergic reaction, magnesium toxicity, ICU admission, hospital readmission, transfusion for any reason, pulmonary edema, cardiomyopathy, Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome, eclamptic seizure, loss of vision, stroke, renal injury requiring dialysis, cardiac arrest, maternal death, unexpected stillbirth or neonatal death, NICU admission, Apgars and length of neonatal respiratory support.

Read the detailed description

Levetiracetam Compared to Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Eclamptic Seizure: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol

  1. Study Title: Levetiracetam Compared to Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Eclamptic Seizure: A Randomized Controlled Trial (LEVMag Trial)
  2. Objectives

    • Primary Objective: To assess whether Levetiracetam is non-inferior to Magnesium Sulfate in preventing eclamptic seizures in laboring and postpartum women with severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome.
    • Secondary Objectives: To compare the safety profiles, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and incidence of adverse events between the two study medications.
  3. Study Design

    • Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    • Setting: Single Urban Level III Obstetric Facility
    • Duration: 72-84 months (including recruitment, treatment, and follow-up).
  4. Study Population

    • Inclusion Criteria:

      • Pregnant or postpartum women aged 19 years or older
      • Diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features, superimposed preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome
      • At risk for eclampsia and eligible for seizure prophylaxis
      • Less than 2 hours exposure to magnesium sulfate or greater than 48 hours since last dose.
    • Exclusion Criteria:

      • \<32 weeks estimated gestational age
      • History of epilepsy or seizure disorders unrelated to pregnancy
      • Allergy or contraindication to Levetiracetam or Magnesium Sulfate
      • Severe renal impairment (Oliguria \<120ml in 4 hours)
      • Plan for neonatal comfort care
  5. Intervention/Comparator

    • Intervention Arm: Levetiracetam 1g PO followed by Levetiracetam 1500 mg/day immediate release PO in 3 divided doses. Divided doses to begin 8 hours after initial 1g loading dose.
    • Control Arm: Magnesium Sulfate 4gm IV over 15-20min followed by 2gm/hr IV infusion (current hospital protocol).
  6. Outcome Measures

    • Primary Outcome:

      o Incidence of eclamptic seizures from enrollment to discharge from delivery hospitalization.

    • Secondary Outcomes:

      • Composite outcome of adverse events and severe adverse events
      • Neonatal 1 and 5 minute Apgar scores, NICU admission, length of respiratory support, neonatal death and stillbirth
  7. Sample Size and Power Calculation

    • Assumptions:
    • Expected seizure incidence with Magnesium Sulfate: 0.5%
    • Non-inferiority margin: 1%
    • Power: 80%
    • Alpha: 0.05 (one-sided)
    • Sample size per group: 620
    • Total sample size: 1,240
  8. Randomization Technique

    • Permuted randomization scheme will be used.
    • Participants will be randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated randomization tool.
    • Block randomization with variable block sizes (4,6,8) will ensure balance between groups.
    • Allocation concealment will be maintained using sealed, opaque envelopes.
  9. Enrollment

    • We are collaborating with the Pharmacy Department to improve timing of patient enrollment. In addition to trained research nurses, participating Pharmacists will be CITI certified.
    • Patients will be identified when an order is entered for Magnesium Sulfate for seizure prophylaxis. A research pharmacist, research RN or principal investigator will then review the chart to ensure the patient meets study inclusion criteria.
    • For patients that meet inclusion criteria they will be approached in the location they are receiving care to review consent forms and be provided the patient bill of rights.
    • Those choosing to participate and completing the consent process will then be randomized. The next randomization envelope will be opened to determine their assigned treatment group and pharmacist will enter the appropriate orders.
    • Due to the urgent nature of this treatment, our goal is to complete enrollment and study assignment in sixty minutes or less after the initial order is received.
  10. Adverse Event Reporting

    • Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be recorded and reported in accordance with ICH-GCP guidelines (see below).
    • SAEs will be reported to the IRB and Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) within 24 hours of when they are identified.
    • Interim safety analyses will be performed by the DSMB every 300 enrolled patients.
    • DSMB- 1 outside MFM provider, 1 non PI Methodist MFM, 1 Methodist OB provider.
  11. Ethical Considerations and Informed Consent

    • Approval will be obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov once IRB approval is attained.
    • Participants will be provided with a detailed informed consent form outlining study procedures, risks, and rights.

Study Justification and Protocol Clarifications Modern anti-epileptic drugs have not been evaluated in their ability to prevent eclamptic seizures. The last studies comparing magnesium sulfate were performed against Nimodipine, a calcium channel blocker, over 20 years ago and phenytoin around 30 years ago. Magnesium sulfate is the current gold standard for seizure prophylaxis in women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy. It is a high risk medication that requires careful management and titration due to the risk for toxicity, respiratory depression, cardiac arrhythmia and death. Despite the high risk nature of a magnesium drip there has not been recent effort to identify safer medications for the prevention of eclamptic seizures. The study authors advocate for the study of Levetiracetam commercially known as Keppra®.

Levetiracetam is FDA approved for tonic-clonic seizures and is already used during pregnancy with an excellent safety profile in women with epilepsy (see appendix A). Use in this trial would be short term (likely 36-96 hours) and in late preterm or term pregnancies. This poses no risk for fetal malformation or birth defects as organogenesis is completed by 12 weeks and the study will enroll patients after 32 weeks gestation. As noted, levetiracetam has demonstrated safety in pregnancy in women with epilepsy and is safe in women who are breastfeeding. It has few significant complications specific to the medication itself and the short-term nature of the use in this study further mitigates those risks. Immediate release levetiracetam reaches maximum concentration in the blood in approximately 1 hour. Magnesium sulfate reaches a peak in 30 minutes when a bolus is given with levels falling by 60 minutes to roughly 2x physiologic levels, but typically below the 2mmol/L that is academically thought to be therapeutic. There is no currently established therapeutic dose based on scientific data. It is not recommended to routinely check magnesium levels during infusion unless there is concern for toxicity or renal impairment.

Inclusion/Exclusion - the reasoning behind our various criteria are related to state law, drug metabolism and to prevent confounders. Patients under 32 weeks gestation are excluded as they should receive magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection and this exposure would confound the exposure groups, 19 y/o is the age of consent in Nebraska and renal impairment is important as both magnesium sulfate and levetiracetam are renally cleared. Since magnesium is rapidly cleared from the body we are choosing to include patients with less than 2 hours of exposure to magnesium or who have not received magnesium in the last 48 hours as we feel this does not clinically confound results due to short duration of exposure or complete clearance of the medication after prior exposure.

Dosing for magnesium is based on medically standardized protocol and Levetiracetam dosing is based on adult dosing in non-pregnant individuals with tonic-clonic seizures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Preeclampsia
  • Eclampsia Preeclampsia

Keywords

  • Seizure
  • Prophylaxis
  • Preeclampsia
  • Eclampsia
  • Keppra
  • Levetiracetam
  • Magnesium
  • LEVMag
  • Equivalence
03

In context

Pre-Eclampsia

916 studies on the registry are indexed under Pre-Eclampsia; 243 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,240 is above the median of 110 across 480 interventional studies indexed under Pre-Eclampsia.

Browse Pre-Eclampsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Nebraska Methodist Health System is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or postpartum women aged 19 years or older
  • Diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features, superimposed preeclampsia or HELLP syndrome
  • At risk for eclampsia and eligible for seizure prophylaxis
  • Less than 2 hours exposure to magnesium sulfate or greater than 48 hours since last dose.
  • Admitted or plan to proceed with delivery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<32 weeks estimated gestational age
  • History of epilepsy or seizure disorders unrelated to pregnancy
  • Allergy or to Levetiracetam or Magnesium Sulfate
  • Severe renal impairment (Oliguria \<120ml in 4 hours)
  • Plan for neonatal comfort care
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Levetiracetam Arm

    This experimental arm will receive oral levetiracetam 3 times daily after an initial loading oral dose.

    Drug: Levetiracetam

  • Active comparator
    Magnesium Sulfate Arm

    This arm will receive standard treatment- a loading dose of magnesium sulfate followed by a continuous infusion that is the current standard of care (4 gram bolus followed by 2grams per hour continuous infusion).

    Drug: magnesium sulfate

Interventions

  • 1g oral loading dose followed by 300mg q 8 hours beginning 8 hours after loading dose.

    Also known as: Keppra

  • 4gram bolus followed by 2g per hour continuous infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Eclamptic Seizure

    Seizure based on clinical diagnosis by managing physician. It will be considered and eclamptic seizure for purposes of the study if it occurs following enrollment in the study.

    Time frame: From enrollment until then end of monitoring at 6 weeks postpartum.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Johannessen Landmark C, Patsalos PN. Drug interactions involving the new second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010 Jan;10(1):119-40. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.136. PubMed 20021326 ↗
  • Loscher W, Schmidt D. New Horizons in the development of antiepileptic drugs: Innovative strategies. Epilepsy Res. 2006 Jun;69(3):183-272. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2006.03.014. PubMed 16835945 ↗
  • Perucca P, Gilliam FG. Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol. 2012 Sep;11(9):792-802. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70153-9. Epub 2012 Jul 24. PubMed 22832500 ↗
  • French JA, Kanner AM, Bautista J, Abou-Khalil B, Browne T, Harden CL, Theodore WH, Bazil C, Stern J, Schachter SC, Bergen D, Hirtz D, Montouris GD, Nespeca M, Gidal B, Marks WJ Jr, Turk WR, Fischer JH, Bourgeois B, Wilner A, Faught RE Jr, Sachdeo RC, Beydoun A, Glauser TA; American Academy of Neurology Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee; American Academy of Neurology Quality Standards Subcommittee; American Epilepsy Society Quality Standards Subcommittee; American Epilepsy Society Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs, I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: report of the TTA and QSS Subcommittees of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia. 2004 May;45(5):401-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.06204.x. PubMed 15101821 ↗
  • Patsalos PN. Clinical pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(11):707-24. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443110-00002. PubMed 15301575 ↗
  • Kanner AM, Ashman E, Gloss D, Harden C, Bourgeois B, Bautista JF, Abou-Khalil B, Burakgazi-Dalkilic E, Llanas Park E, Stern J, Hirtz D, Nespeca M, Gidal B, Faught E, French J. Practice guideline update summary: Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: Treatment of new-onset epilepsy: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2018 Jul 10;91(2):74-81. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005755. Epub 2018 Jun 13. PubMed 29898971 ↗
  • Appleton RE, Rainford NE, Gamble C, Messahel S, Humphreys A, Hickey H, Woolfall K, Roper L, Noblet J, Lee E, Potter S, Tate P, Al Najjar N, Iyer A, Evans V, Lyttle MD. Levetiracetam as an alternative to phenytoin for second-line emergency treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: the EcLiPSE RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(58):1-96. doi: 10.3310/hta24580. PubMed 33190679 ↗
  • Shorvon SD, Lowenthal A, Janz D, Bielen E, Loiseau P. Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group. Epilepsia. 2000 Sep;41(9):1179-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb00323.x. PubMed 10999557 ↗
  • Ben-Menachem E, Falter U. Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group. Epilepsia. 2000 Oct;41(10):1276-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb04605.x. PubMed 11051122 ↗
  • Chamberlain JM, Kapur J, Shinnar S, Elm J, Holsti M, Babcock L, Rogers A, Barsan W, Cloyd J, Lowenstein D, Bleck TP, Conwit R, Meinzer C, Cock H, Fountain NB, Underwood E, Connor JT, Silbergleit R; Neurological Emergencies Treatment Trials; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network investigators. Efficacy of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate for established status epilepticus by age group (ESETT): a double-blind, responsive-adaptive, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1217-1224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30611-5. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PubMed 32203691 ↗
  • Hope OA, Harris KM. Management of epilepsy during pregnancy and lactation. BMJ. 2023 Sep 8;382:e074630. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074630. PubMed 37684052 ↗
  • Carosella CM, Johnson EL. Special Issues in Medical Management: Hormones and Pregnancy in Epilepsy. Semin Neurol. 2025 Apr;45(2):198-205. doi: 10.1055/a-2551-0688. Epub 2025 Apr 3. PubMed 40179957 ↗
  • Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, Sabers A, Thomas SV, Vajda F; EURAP Study Group. Comparative risk of major congenital malformations with eight different antiepileptic drugs: a prospective cohort study of the EURAP registry. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jun;17(6):530-538. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30107-8. Epub 2018 Apr 18. PubMed 29680205 ↗
  • Meador KJ, Pennell PB, Harden CL, Gordon JC, Tomson T, Kaplan PW, Holmes GL, French JA, Hauser WA, Wells PG, Cramer JA; HOPE Work Group. Pregnancy registries in epilepsy: a consensus statement on health outcomes. Neurology. 2008 Sep 30;71(14):1109-17. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316199.92256.af. Epub 2008 Aug 13. PubMed 18703463 ↗
  • Mawhinney E, Craig J, Morrow J, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, Liggan B, Irwin B, Delanty N, Hunt SJ. Levetiracetam in pregnancy: results from the UK and Ireland epilepsy and pregnancy registers. Neurology. 2013 Jan 22;80(4):400-5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0874. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23303847 ↗
  • Shallcross R, Bromley RL, Cheyne CP, Garcia-Finana M, Irwin B, Morrow J, Baker GA; Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group; UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. In utero exposure to levetiracetam vs valproate: development and language at 3 years of age. Neurology. 2014 Jan 21;82(3):213-21. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000030. Epub 2014 Jan 8. PubMed 24401687 ↗
  • Shallcross R, Bromley RL, Irwin B, Bonnett LJ, Morrow J, Baker GA; Liverpool Manchester Neurodevelopment Group; UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. Child development following in utero exposure: levetiracetam vs sodium valproate. Neurology. 2011 Jan 25;76(4):383-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182088297. PubMed 21263139 ↗
  • Chaudhry SA, Jong G, Koren G. The fetal safety of Levetiracetam: a systematic review. Reprod Toxicol. 2014 Jul;46:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 3. PubMed 24602560 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified IPD will be shared on a case-by-case basis.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: IPD will be shared beginning 1 year after publication.

Access criteria: Deidentified IPD will be shared on a case by case basis with principal investigators by contacting the PI for this study.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2026; primary completion for Dec 2033, 95 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 20, 2025
First posted
Oct 24, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2033
CompletionEst.
Jul 2034
Last update
Oct 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07220902
Lead sponsor
Nebraska Methodist Health System
Responsible party
Todd Lovgren (Primary Investigator, Nebraska Methodist Health System) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 24, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2033 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2034 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 24, 2025

Study contacts

Todd Lovgren, MD
Contact
todd.lovgren@nmhs.org
1+402-815-1970
Joshua Dahlke, MD
Contact
joshua.dahlke@nmhs.org
1+402-815-1970
Todd Lovgren, MD
principal investigator · Nebraska Methodist Health System

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Levetiracetam

Start the discussion