ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07206433Updated Oct 3, 2025

Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) and Spoken Language

An observational study in TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack), sponsored by Newcastle University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Sponsored by Newcastle University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Ages
40 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Transient Ischaemic Attack (also known as TIA or 'mini-stroke') affects about 46,000 people in the UK each year. It is assumed that people recover fully within 24 hours. However, subtle problems with speaking, and confidence with their communication skills can be long-term. This project will be the first in depth exploration of speaking abilities after recent TIA where there seemed to be a full recovery.

The researchers will look for 90 volunteers for detailed testing. Thirty people who have had a TIA for the first time. For comparisons, the researchers will also include 60 volunteers without TIA (30 treated to prevent TIA and stroke; 30 who do not receive prevention treatments).

Aims and methods:

  1. To find out if TIA makes speaking difficult.

    People will complete speaking tasks in a quiet place. For example, people will be asked to tell us about their weekend, what they think about climate change.

  2. To find out if people are concerned about their speech and other thinking skills after TIA.

    People will fill in questionnaires to help us look into these issues.

  3. To find out if speaking abilities and people's own views of their communication change over time (about three months after the TIA).

Discovering new knowledge about spoken communication after a TIA diagnosis could change the course of TIA research and care across health professions (speech-language therapy, psychology, audiology, neurology). Future studies could use speaking tasks to scrutinise further the complexity of subtle communication problems after TIA and determine which individuals are likely to have these problems. The project will raise understanding of these issues, enabling affected individuals to seek professional support. Finally, it will also guide development of new TIA recommendations and treatments for these problems thus improving people's quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; (Nasreddine et al., 2005): Assesses general cognitive function; reliable and valid; different versions for repeated assessment (e.g., sentence repetition "I only know that John is the one to help today"; You'll hear a list of numbers and I'd like you to repeat them in the order you heard them).

Everyday Memory Questionnaire (Sunderland et al., 1986): Self-reported measure of cognitive skills many of which are about communication, language and reading (Likert scale) (e.g., forgetting the names of friends or relatives or calling them by the wrong names; getting lost or turning in the wrong direction on a journey or walk you have often been on).

Data analyses

For aims 1 and 2, the methods of analysis for each of the outcome measures is detailed below and will be in conducted in R.

Descriptive statistics by subgroup (medians, range, inter-quartile range) will be generated for each outcome measure (speech-related [primary, secondary], Everyday Memory Questionnaire, Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia).

Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance will be carried out for each outcome measure (alpha level .05). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons (using Dunn's test correction for multiple comparisons) for statistically significant results. Effect sizes will also be obtained.

Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (Cherney et al., 2011): Self-reported confidence in communication activities (Likert scale) (e.g., how confident are you about your ability to talk with people? How confident are you that people understand you when you talk?)

Connected speech assessment tasks (Whitworth et al., 2015): Assesses connected speech skills, (e.g., can you tell me what you did last weekend? Can you remember a recent celebration such as a birthday, anniversary, wedding or party that you have been to? Can you tell me about it? What do you think about global warming and why?)

For aim 3, descriptive statistics (as above) will be generated for each outcome measure non-parametric Wilcoxon tests (alpha level 0.5) will be used. Effect sizes will also be obtained. These analyses will also be carried out in R.

02

Conditions studied

  • TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack)

Keywords

  • TIA
  • Transient Ischemic Attack
  • speech
  • language
03

In context

Ischemic Attack, Transient

329 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Attack, Transient; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 343 across 140 observational studies indexed under Ischemic Attack, Transient.

Browse Ischemic Attack, Transient studies →

Lead sponsor

Newcastle University is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

TIA group: Individuals who have had a recent single medically confirmed TIA following an in-person review at a TIA clinic.

Vascular risk factor group: People aged 40-75 with vascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia) who receive medical treatment for these conditions and have attended a TIA clinic but were not diagnosed with a TIA.

Healthy group: People aged 40-75 who have no self-reported vascular risk factors for which they take medication.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: People aged 40-85 with a diagnosis of a single carotid circulation .

Exclusion Criteria:

Younger than 40 years or older than 85 years of age.

English as a secondary language.

Neurological conditions affecting cognitive function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, dementia, stroke).

Self-reported, pre-existing speech or cognitive problems, developmental or acquired.

Demonstrate noticeable difficulties carrying out project-related tasks.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Speech rate

    measured as number of words per minute

    Time frame: From enrollment

  2. Mean length of sentence

    measured in number of words

    Time frame: From enrollment

  3. Sentence complexity

    measured as number of complex sentences

    Time frame: From enrollment

  4. Functional Memory Questionnaire

    Patient-reported measure of perceptions of memory, attention, language abilities; score range 0 to 140; higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Time frame: From enrollment

  5. Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia

    Patient-reported measure of confidence of communication abilities; score range 0 to 600; higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: From enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Filled pause rate

    Number of filled paused (i.e., "um" "uh", "ehm") over total number of words

    Time frame: From enrollment

  2. Lexical richness

    measured as number of unique words over total number of words

    Time frame: From enrollment

  3. Propositional idea density

    using the Computerized Propositional Idea Density Rater - CPIDER3 - Brown et al. (2008)

    Time frame: From enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07206433
Lead sponsor
Newcastle University
Collaborators
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 3, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

Christos Salis, PhD
Contact
christos.salis@ncl.ac.uk
+441912088875
Janet Webster, PhD
Contact
janet.webster@ncl.ac.uk
+441912085235
Christos Salis, PhD
principal investigator · Newcastle University
Lisa Shaw, MD
study chair · Newcastle University
Christopher Price, MD
study chair · Newcastle University
Mahmoud Kargar, MSc
study chair · Newcastle University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion