CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07203222Updated Jun 17, 2026

Comparison of Effectiveness of Low Dose Laser and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation in Hemiplegic Shoulder

An interventional study of Low Dose Laser and TENS in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain, sponsored by Ankara Etlik City Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-17.

Sponsored by Ankara Etlik City Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), which are analgesic modalities that play an important role in the treatment of this frequently encountered complication. The secondary aim of the study is to evaluate its effectiveness on upper extremity function, quality of life, sleep, and fatigue.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. (1) Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is one of the common complications seen in up to 40% of stroke patients and negatively affects the rehabilitation process. (2) It is also a significant complication that prolongs hospital stay. Therefore, developing effective treatment strategies is extremely important.

The primary aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT), which are analgesic modalities that play an important role in the treatment of this frequently encountered complication.

Treatment methods used for hemiplegic shoulder pain: Exercises (joint range of motion, stretching and strengthening exercises), physical therapy agents, kinesiology taping, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), suprascapular nerve block (SSNB), suprascapular nerve pulsed radiofrequency (PRF), botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) intramuscular injections, corticosteroid injections, segmental neuromyotherapy (SNMT), trigger point dry needling (TrPs-DN), robot-assisted shoulder rehabilitation therapy (RSRT), platelet-rich plasma (PrP) injection, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation ( rTMS), peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), functional electrical stimulation (FES), and interferential current stimulation (IFC) play a role in the management of the hemiplegic shoulder pain clinic. (3)

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemiplegic shoulder pain
  • Low Dose Laser
  • TENS
  • Ultrasonographic evaluation
  • Upper extremity function
  • stroke
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Etlik City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 75 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18-75 years
  • Patients with shoulder pain on the hemiplegic side *Mini mental state examination ≥ 25
  • History of stroke within the last 2 weeks to 6 months
  • Patients with shoulder pain scoring 40-100 points on the visual analogue scale (moderate to severe) will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to provide written consent or attend follow-up visits
  • Being under 18 years of age
  • Patients with motor aphasia
  • Patients who have had a shoulder injection within the last 3 months
  • Patients who have undergone upper extremity botulinum toxin application within the last 6 months

    *Pregnant women or those planning to become pregnant

  • Inflammatory rheumatic disease
  • Patients who have undergone shoulder injury and surgery prior to stroke
  • Patients with other conditions that could explain shoulder pain
  • Patients with complex regional pain syndrome
  • Patients with a history of epilepsy, pacemaker, or arrhythmia diagnosis
  • Malignancy
  • Diseases such as Alzheimer's or dementia that cause cognitive impairment -History of psychiatric disorders such as major depression or personality disorders
  • Alcohol and drug addiction
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low Dose Laser Group

    Patients who will undergo low laser therapy

    Device: Low Dose Laser · Other: Conventional physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    TENS group

    Patients who will undergo TENS therapy

    Device: TENS · Other: Conventional physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Therapy

    Patients who will undergo conventional therapy

    Other: Conventional physical therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceLow Dose Laser

    Patients with subacromial-subdeltoid bursa, m. deltoideus, m. biceps longus, m. infraspinatus, and m. supraspinatus muscles (at the most painful point of the muscles) with a 13-diode Gallium-Aluminium-Arsenide laser device (Intelect Mobile Laser) with a wavelength of 850 nm and 50 mW, 4 Joules per day, 20 seconds, for a total of 15 laser sessions.

  • DeviceTENS

    TENS therapy will be administered using the TENS device (Intelect Advanced Therapy System) for a total of 15 sessions, 5 days a week, 20 minutes per day, at a dose of 20-40 mA.

  • OtherConventional physical therapy

    Only conventional physiotherapy is planned to be administered to patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    It is a method used to measure a person's level of pain or discomfort. The VAS allows patients to quantitatively express their level of pain or discomfort based on their own perceptions. The VAS is scored on a scale of 0-100. Mild: 10-39, Moderate: 40-79, Severe: 80-100

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Function Scale

    It is a scale used to assess sensorimotor impairment in patients with a history of stroke. It is designed to evaluate motor function, balance, sensation, and joint function in patients with hemiplegia. Each task is scored on a scale of 0 to 2. The total score ranges from 0 to 66.

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  2. Joint Range of Motion (ROM) Measurement

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  3. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  4. Barthel Index

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  5. Beck Depression Scale

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  6. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

  7. Ultrasonographic findings

    Sonographic criteria have been defined based on previous studies.

    Time frame: patients will be checked on first day of hospitalization, after treatment at 4 weeks and after treatment 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital
    Ankara, Yenimahalle 06010, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07203222
Lead sponsor
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Responsible party
Ayse Naz Kalem (PM&R Specialist, Ankara Etlik City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 2, 2025
Start date
Sep 24, 2025
Primary completion
May 30, 2026
Completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2026

Study contacts

Aliye Aygün, specialist
Contact
aliyeaygunn@hotmail.com
+90 0312 797 00 00 ext. +903122911000
nihal tezel, associate professor
study director · Ankara Etlik City Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion