An observational study in Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Acceptability, sponsored by Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.
Sponsored by Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital · Observational
This study aimed to compare the patient acceptability (preference, length, and difficulty) and accuracy of Chat-Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) responses to questions from people with osteoarthritis (OA) with physician responses.
This was a cross-sectional study where participants were invited by e-mail to participate in the questionnaire to compare Chatbot responses to physician responses.
2,974 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 438 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 286 is above the median of 100 across 601 observational studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.
Browse Osteoarthritis studies →Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
There were two groups of participants: 1) a panel of people with OA evaluating the preference, length, and difficulty, and 2) a panel of experts in the field of OA evaluating the accuracy of the responses
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Preferred response
Binary outcome, chatbot or physician response. This was an average based on the preferences on the 7 FAQs.
Time frame: From invitation until the end of the study at two weeks
Rating of length
Rating of both responses (chatbot and physician response) included 'too short', 'good', and 'too long'.
Time frame: From invitation until the end of the study at two weeks
Rating of difficulty
Rating of difficulty included 'too easy', 'good', and 'too difficult' for both responses.
Time frame: From invitation until the end of the study at two weeks
Accuracy
Accuracy of the responses included the options 'Completely incorrect,' 'partly incorrect, ' 'approximately equally correct and incorrect,' 'mostly correct,' 'completely correct'.
Time frame: From invitation until the end of the study at two weeks
Number of words of the responses
Time frame: This was determined before the study started
Plan to share: Undecided — The dataset supporting the conclusions of this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital