ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07201701HETEROCYPUpdated Dec 2, 2025

Is CYP24A1 Heterozygosity a Risk Factor for Nephrolithiasis?

An observational study in Nephrolithiasis, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
2 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Biallelic loss-of-function variants in CYP24A1 have been identified as a common genetic cause of autosomal recessive hypercalcemia (ARH, ORPHA 300547, 1 in 80,000 live births), characterized by low PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels, a high 25-OH D/24,25-(OH)₂D ratio, and susceptibility to vitamin D intoxication.

In humans, heterozygous pathogenic variants in CYP24A1 have been proposed both as responsible for an autosomal dominant disorder and as a risk factor for nephrolithiasis, but the rarity and heterogeneity of human data prevent a definitive answer to this crucial question.

Nephrolithiasis is a complex disease in which nutritional factors - particularly sodium and protein intake (leading to hypercalciuria) - play a key role. It also has a heritability of 50%, suggesting the involvement of many genetic susceptibility factors, as well as monogenic forms (mainly autosomal recessive, but also dominant or X-linked), which have been identified in 10-20% of patients.

The increasing prevalence of nephrolithiasis, affecting approximately 10% of the general population over a lifetime, has a significant financial impact on healthcare systems and imposes a major burden of morbidity, justifying further investigation into the genetic underpinnings of nephrolithiasis.

The goal of the HeteroCYP project is to improve understanding of the phenotypes associated with heterozygous, compound heterozygous, and homozygous variants of CYP24A1 by comparing clinical and biological outcomes in patients according to their mutation type

02

Conditions studied

  • Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

  • CYP24A1 heterozygous
  • Nephrolithiasis
  • CYP24A1 homozygous, and compound heterozygous
  • Nephrocalcinosis
03

In context

Nephrolithiasis

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Nephrolithiasis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 100 across 57 observational studies indexed under Nephrolithiasis.

Browse Nephrolithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study focuses on patients who are CYP24A1 heterozygous, CYP24A1 homozygous, or compound heterozygous.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Group 1: Heterozygous Patients

  • Aged between 2 and 90 years
  • Weight > 12 kg
  • Carriers of a heterozygous CYP24A1 mutation
  • With or without symptoms: history of nephrocalcinosis or kidney stones

Group 2: Homozygous / Compound Heterozygous Patients

  • Aged between 2 and 90 years
  • Weight > 12 kg
  • Carriers of a homozygous or compound heterozygous CYP24A1 mutation
  • With or without symptoms: history of nephrocalcinosis or kidney stones

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals unable to collect 24-hour urine
  • Individuals unable to be available for a full day in a day hospital (HDJ)
  • Pregnant, postpartum, or breastfeeding women
  • Individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Individuals receiving psychiatric care
  • Individuals admitted to a healthcare or social institution for reasons other than participation in research
  • Adults under legal protection (guardianship or trusteeship)
  • Individuals not affiliated with a social security system or not benefiting from an equivalent scheme
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients carriers of a heterozygous CYP2A1 mutation

    Patients carriers of a heterozygous CYP2A1 mutation with or without symptoms: history of nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis

    Biological: Supplementary blood samples for PBMC analysis at V2

  • Patients carriers of homozygous, and compound heterozygous CYP2A1 mutation

    Patients carriers of homozygous, and compound heterozygous CYP2A1 mutation with or without symptoms: history of nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis

    Biological: Supplementary blood samples for PBMC analysis at V2

Interventions

  • BiologicalSupplementary blood samples for PBMC analysis at V2

    Supplementary blood (serum and plasma) and urines samples for bio collection at V3

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of nephrolithiasis in patients who are CYP24A1 heterozygous and homozygous (or compound heterozygous)

    Prevalence of nephrolithiasis (based on imaging) in patients who are CYP24A1

    Time frame: Visit 2 (at least 24 hours after baseline)

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2025; primary completion for Oct 2026, 10 months later.

Of 27 observational studies under Nephrolithiasis, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 54. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 22, 2025
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
Last update
Dec 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07201701
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Justine Pr BACCHETTA
Contact
Justine.bacchetta@chu-lyon.fr
0033427856178
Lydia SLIMANI
Contact
Sacha.flammier@chu-lyon.fr
0033472681349
Justine Pr BACCHETTA
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion