ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07200115CRDB RCTUpdated Feb 5, 2026

RCT of Cervical Ripening Double Ballon Catheter Prior to Dilation and Evacuation.

An interventional study of Cervical Ripening Double Balloon (CRDB) Catheter and Osmotic Dilators in Cervical Preparation Prior to Dilation and Evacuation, sponsored by Yale University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-05.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the overnight use of an FDA-cleared CRDB catheter is superior to the use of overnight osmotic dilators as is standard of care cervical preparation for patients presenting for dilation and evacuation (D\&E). The CRDB catheter is an FDA cleared device for cervical dilation prior to labor induction at term. It has not been FDA cleared for cervical dilation in the second-trimester, however, will be used in a similar fashion to labor inductions at term. Our standard of care osmotic dilators (e.g., laminaria, Dilapan-S) are both FDA cleared for cervical dilation prior to labor induction at term or gynecologic procedures requiring cervical dilation.

Read the detailed description

This study is a two-arm, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial of a cervical ripening double balloon (CRDB) catheter compared to osmotic dilators (e.g., laminaria and/or Dilapan-S) for overnight cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation (D\&E). The primary outcome will be mean cervical dilation as assessed by the physician immediately prior to D\&E.

Established patients will be approached by a member of the research team about study participation after they have provided informed consent for D\&E. Allocation to the study group will be based on a 1:1 blocked randomization scheme. The participant will be informed of their assignment immediately prior to their cervical preparation procedure. Neither the physician nor the patient will be blinded to the assignment as this is not feasible given the differences in interventions.

  1. Intervention Group: The physician will place a CRDB catheter as directed by the manufacturer's user guide. The uterine balloon of the CRDB catheter will be inflated with 20-40 mL of saline based upon the participant's tolerance.
  2. Control Group: The physician will place osmotic dilators in the standard fashion. The number of dilators and use of laminaria, Dilapan-S, or a combination will be determined by physician preference.

On the day of the D\&E procedure, the physician will remove the cervical dilating device and measure the patient's cervical dilation. Additional data will be collected on the following items.

  • Need for and amount of mechanical dilation
  • Total procedure time will be calculated in minutes based on the procedure start and stop times recorded in the patient's electronic medical record.
02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Preparation Prior to Dilation and Evacuation

Keywords

  • cervical preparation
  • osmotic dilators
  • cervical ripening double balloon catheter
  • dilation and evacuation
03

In context

Dilatation, Pathologic

120 studies on the registry are indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 82 across 84 interventional studies indexed under Dilatation, Pathologic.

Browse Dilatation, Pathologic studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,770 studies on the registry; 294 are open to participants now.

Of its 221 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 129 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Singleton pregnancy between 19 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days GD.
  • Planning to undergo D\&E with Yale Family Planning and has undergone standard informed clinical consent counseling for the procedure and signed the clinical procedure consent form.
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the active part of the study.
  • English- or Spanish-speaking individual.
  • Residents of the state of Connecticut.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spontaneous or induced fetal demise.
  • Multiple pregnancy.
  • Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).
  • Intraamniotic infection.
  • Active genital tract infection.
  • Active vaginal bleeding.
  • Placenta previa or vasa previa.
  • Placenta accreta spectrum.
  • History of >3 cesarean deliveries.
  • >45 kg/m2.
  • to osmotic cervical dilator or CRDB catheter use as determined by the physician.
  • Contraindication to medication used during standard of care cervical preparation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cervical Ripening Double Balloon (CRDB) Catheter

    Device: Cervical Ripening Double Balloon (CRDB) Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Osmotic Dilators

    Device: Osmotic Dilators

Interventions

  • DeviceCervical Ripening Double Balloon (CRDB) Catheter

    The physician will place a CRDB catheter for overnight cervical preparation. The CRDB catheter is comprised of two balloons that can be inflated with up to 80 mL of sterile water.

  • DeviceOsmotic Dilators

    Osmotic dilators (e.g., laminaria and Dilapan-S) are mechanical dilators that are placed in the cervix prior to gynecologic procedures and facilitate dilation through the slow absorption of moisture. The physician will place osmotic dilators in the standard fashion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Cervical Dilation

    Cervical dilation will be measured in centimeters.

    Time frame: Day 1 (cervical preparation visit) to Day 2 (D&E)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need for Mechanical Dilation at the Time of Procedural Abortion

    This is a binary "yes/no" outcome reported as the percentage of patients needing mechanical dilation in our experimental arm compared to the active comparator arm.

    Time frame: Day 2 (D&E)

  2. Mean Total Procedure Time

    Procedure time will be measured in minutes.

    Time frame: Day 2 (D&E)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Yale Family Planning Clinic
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
    Recruiting
    • Yale Family Planning · Contactfpresearch@yale.edu · 203-785-5074
    • Yale Family Planning · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Atad J, Hallak M, Auslender R, Porat-Packer T, Zarfati D, Abramovici H. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00389-4. PubMed 8559528 ↗
  • Cook Medical. Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon with Stylet.
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. PubMed 18929686 ↗
  • Liu SM, Henkel A, Meza P, Shorter JM, Cahill E, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Comparing transcervical balloon with osmotic dilators for cervical preparation prior to procedural abortion: A noninferiority randomized trial. Contraception. 2024 Dec;140:110550. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110550. Epub 2024 Jul 25. PubMed 39067560 ↗
  • Ornat L, Alonso-Ventura V, Bueno-Notivol J, Chedraui P, Perez-Lopez FR; Health Outcomes and Systematic Analyses (HOUSSAY) Research Group. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3453-3468. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1574741. Epub 2019 Feb 10. PubMed 30741051 ↗
  • Solt I, Frank Wolf M, Ben-Haroush S, Kaminskyi S, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(7):1034-1041. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1623776. Epub 2019 Jun 11. PubMed 31185762 ↗
  • Hoppe KK, Schiff MA, Peterson SE, Gravett MG. 30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):1919-25. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297. PubMed 26302817 ↗
  • Cook Medical. (2021) A nonpharmaceutical option for preinduction dilation. Cervical ripening balloon with stylet.
  • Atad J, Hallak M, Ben-David Y, Auslender R, Abramovici H. Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):29-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10644.x. PubMed 8988692 ↗
  • Beaty O 3rd, Sloop CH, Schmid HE Jr, Buckalew VM Jr. Renin response and angiotensinogen control during graded hemorrhage and shock in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1976 Oct;231(4):1300-7. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.231.4.1300. PubMed 984215 ↗
  • Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967 Feb;74(1):44-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x. No abstract available. PubMed 6018096 ↗
  • "Options for second-trimester termination." Contemporary OB/GYN, Nov. 2013, www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/options-second-trimester-termination. Accessed 16 Mar. 2025.
  • Lambert SJ, Lunde B, Porsch L, Stoffels G, MacIsaac L, Dayananda I, Dragoman MV. Adjuvant misoprostol or mifepristone for cervical preparation with osmotic dilators before dilation and evacuation. Contraception. 2024 Apr;132:110364. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110364. Epub 2024 Jan 11. PubMed 38218312 ↗
  • White KO, Jones HE, Shorter J, Norman WV, Guilbert E, Lichtenberg ES, Paul M. Second-trimester surgical abortion practices in the United States. Contraception. 2018 Apr 14:S0010-7824(18)30140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.004. Online ahead of print. PubMed 29665357 ↗
  • Casey FE, Ye PP, Perritt JD, Moreno-Ruiz NL, Reeves MF. A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2016 Aug;94(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.032. Epub 2016 Mar 4. PubMed 26948184 ↗
  • Goldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, Dean G, Lichtenberg ES, Bednarek PH, Chen BA, Dutton C, McKetta S, Maurer R, Winikoff B, Fitzmaurice GM. Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation Using Adjunctive Misoprostol or Mifepristone Compared With Overnight Osmotic Dilators Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):599-609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000977. PubMed 26196084 ↗
  • Shaw KA, Shaw JG, Hugin M, Velasquez G, Hopkins FW, Blumenthal PD. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 12. PubMed 25499589 ↗
  • Diedrich JT, Drey EA, Newmann SJ. Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 20-24 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2020 May;101(5):286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 31. PubMed 32007418 ↗
  • Sanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, Mozurkewich EL, Ramsey PS, Adair CD, Kaunitz AM, McKinney JA. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S669-S695. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Jul 13. PubMed 38462252 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2027, 21 months after the start.

Of 27 interventional studies with no phase under Dilatation, Pathologic, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 22, 2025
First posted
Sep 30, 2025
StartActual
Dec 3, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2028
Last update
Feb 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07200115
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 30, 2025
Start date
Dec 3, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 5, 2026

Study contacts

Yale Family Planning
Contact
fpresearch@yale.edu
203-785-5074
Tessa Madden, MD
principal investigator · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion