ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07198061Updated Apr 22, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Combined With Endovascular Intervention for Diabetic Foot Ulcers With Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion

An interventional study of Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) and Sham CAP Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU) and Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion, sponsored by Shenyang Medical College. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-22.

Sponsored by Shenyang Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) combined with endovascular intervention can accelerate wound healing and improve safety outcomes in patients aged 18 to 80 years with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) complicated by lower extremity arterial occlusion.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does CAP treatment lead to a greater reduction in ulcer area by Week 4 compared to placebo?;
  2. Is CAP therapy safe and well-tolerated in patients with DFUs after successful infrapopliteal revascularisation?;

Researchers will compare CAP treatment plus standard care to sham CAP (placebo) plus standard care to see if CAP improves wound healing more effectively and reduces adverse local symptoms.

Participants will:

  1. Receive either active CAP therapy or sham CAP therapy once daily for 10 days following endovascular revascularisation
  2. Undergo daily wound assessments for ulcer area, signs of infection, and pain scores
  3. Complete quality-of-life questionnaires (EQ-5D and SF-12) at baseline and Week 4
  4. Be followed through Week 4 to assess efficacy and safety endpoints
Read the detailed description

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) complicated by lower extremity arterial occlusion are difficult to heal, even after successful endovascular revascularisation, due to persistent microcirculatory impairment and chronic inflammation. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has shown promising effects in promoting wound healing through antimicrobial activity, angiogenesis induction, and modulation of inflammatory responses. However, its efficacy and safety in the clinical treatment of DFUs remain to be validated in randomized controlled trials.

This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center clinical trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of CAP therapy, delivered as CAP-activated gas, in patients with DFUs who have undergone successful infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty. Participants will receive either active or sham CAP therapy once daily for 10 days, in addition to standard DFU care. The primary endpoint is the percentage reduction in ulcer area at Week 4. Secondary outcomes include time to early healing response, pain scores, quality of life, and local adverse events.

The results of this study are expected to provide clinical evidence supporting the use of CAP as an adjunctive therapy in ischemic diabetic foot wound management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
  • Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusion

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cold Atmospheric Plasma
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers
  • lower extremity arterial occlusion
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Shenyang Medical College is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1)Age between 18 and 80 years; diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus; with ≤10%;
  • 2)Presence of at least one chronic foot ulcer persisting for ≥3 weeks, with no signs of healing despite guideline-directed standard care; ulcer classified as Wagner-Armstrong grade 1D or 2D;
  • 3)Imaging-confirmed infrapopliteal arterial stenosis or occlusion, assessed by vascular ultrasound and/or computed tomography angiography (CTA); all patients must have undergone infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty, with successful target vessel revascularisation confirmed intraoperatively (≤30% residual stenosis);
  • 4)Signed written prior to study participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1)Concurrent use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) or maggot debridement therapy;
  • 2)Undergoing dialysis for end-stage renal disease;
  • 3)Use of topical antibiotics with known biological activity on the wound;
  • 4)Use of -rich fibrin (PRF) for wound treatment;
  • 5)Women of without effective , or currently breastfeeding;
  • 6)Presence of severe comorbidities involving other organ systems, with an estimated of less than 6 months;
  • 7)Participation in another clinical trial within the past 3 months, or currently enrolled in another clinical study;
  • 8)Any condition deemed unsuitable for trial participation at the discretion of the investigators.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) Group

    Participants with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and infrapopliteal arterial occlusion who receive CAP therapy once daily for 10 days following successful endovascular intervention.

    Device: Cold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP) · Procedure: Infrapopliteal Endovascular Revascularisation · Other: Guideline-Based Standard DFU Care

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham CAP (Placebo) Group

    Participants with DFUs and infrapopliteal arterial occlusion who receive sham CAP therapy with an identical-looking device that does not produce active plasma.

    Device: Sham CAP Therapy · Procedure: Infrapopliteal Endovascular Revascularisation · Other: Guideline-Based Standard DFU Care

Interventions

  • DeviceCold Atmospheric Plasma (CAP)

    CAP-activated gas treatment developed by Xi'an Jiaotong University (Chinese patent No. ZL202110209052.X); administered once daily for 10 days, 25 minutes per session.

  • DeviceSham CAP Therapy

    Identical equipment without plasma activation; simulates treatment environment (sound, airflow) for participant blinding.

  • ProcedureInfrapopliteal Endovascular Revascularisation

    Balloon angioplasty is performed on infrapopliteal arteries with significant stenosis or occlusion. Technical success is defined as \<30% residual stenosis, confirmed intraoperatively by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Only patients with successful revascularisation are eligible for randomisation.

  • OtherGuideline-Based Standard DFU Care

    All participants will receive diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care according to current international and Chinese clinical guidelines

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ulcer area (cm²)

    Ulcer area will be measured at baseline, daily from Day 1 to Day 10, and at Week 4 post-randomisation. Measurements are obtained from calibrated wound photographs and analysed using ImageJ software. Primary endpoint will be analysed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate differences between groups over time.

    Time frame: assessed at baseline, Day 1 to Day 10 post-randomisation, and at Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to 10% reduction in ulcer area

    The time (in days) from baseline to the first documentation of ≥10% reduction in ulcer surface area compared to baseline, as measured by calibrated wound photography analysed using ImageJ software. Ulcer size is measured daily from Day 1 to Day 10 and at Week 4.

    Time frame: From baseline through Day 10 and Week 4 post-randomisation

  2. Mean change in pain score measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Pain severity will be assessed using the 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Measurements will be taken at baseline, daily from Day 1 to Day 10, and at Week 4 post-randomisation. Change in VAS score over time will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline; daily from Day 1 to Day 10; and at Week 4 post-randomisation

  3. Change in quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline and Week 4 post-randomisation. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system evaluates five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = no problems, 5 = extreme problems).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomisation

  4. Change in quality of life (SF-12)

    Quality of life will be assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at baseline and Week 4 post-randomisation. The SF-12 is a validated instrument designed to evaluate health-related quality of life across physical and mental health domains. It yields two composite summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). Each component score typically ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomisation

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of skin irritation

    The presence or absence of skin irritation at the treatment site will be recorded by trained clinical staff during each treatment session (Day 1-10) and at Week 4. Skin irritation includes erythema, rash, itching, or other subjective symptoms reported by the participant or observed by the investigator.

    Time frame: Daily from baseline to Day 10 and at Week 4 post-randomisation

  2. Incidence of local bleeding

    Bleeding at the wound or treatment site will be assessed by visual inspection and clinical documentation. Events are recorded as present or absent at each time point, and severity (mild, moderate, severe) will be noted if applicable.

    Time frame: Daily from baseline to Day 10 and at Week 4 post-randomisation

  3. Incidence of local burning sensation

    Participants will be asked to report any burning sensation at the treatment site during or after CAP exposure. Events will be recorded as present or absent, and graded based on severity. This outcome will help assess the tolerability of CAP treatment.

    Time frame: Daily from baseline to Day 10 and at Week 4 post-randomisation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 13 months after the start.

Of 240 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 343 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 25, 2025
First posted
Sep 30, 2025
StartActual
Oct 9, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Nov 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07198061
Lead sponsor
Shenyang Medical College
Collaborators
Ansteel Group General Hospital
Responsible party
Lin Tao (Assoc. Prof., Shenyang Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2025
Start date
Oct 9, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 22, 2026

Study contacts

Yun-En Liu, MD
Contact
lye9901@163.com
86-24-62215130
Yun-En Liu, MD
study chair · Shenyang Medical College
Lin Tao, MM
principal investigator · Shenyang Medical College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion