An interventional study of Exercise in Aging, sponsored by Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. Completed at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.
Sponsored by Instituto Politécnico de Bragança · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This study investigated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on functional fitness in older adults. As people age, they often experience a natural decline in physical abilities such as strength, flexibility, balance, and endurance, which can limit their ability to perform daily activities independently. Finding safe and effective exercise strategies to maintain or improve these abilities is critical for promoting healthy aging and preserving autonomy.
In this study, older adults participated in a structured HIIT program adapted to their functional capacity. HIIT consists of short bursts of intense physical activity followed by periods of active rest. This type of training is known for improving cardiovascular and muscular fitness in a short period of time.
Participants were assessed on various aspects of physical function before, during, and after the intervention. Tests included handgrip strength, upper and lower body strength, flexibility, aerobic endurance, and mobility.
The results showed that HIIT significantly improved physical function in older adults, including increased muscle strength, flexibility, aerobic capacity, and agility. These findings suggest that HIIT can be a safe, efficient, and accessible option to promote health and independence in the aging population.
This randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol on functional fitness in community-dwelling older adults. With the global rise in life expectancy and the associated functional decline in aging populations, there is an increasing demand for time-efficient, evidence-based interventions that can promote physical independence and healthy aging.
Participants aged 60 years or older were recruited and assigned to either a HIIT intervention group or a control group. The HIIT group engaged in supervised training sessions three times per week. Each session included a warm-up, a core HIIT segment with short bursts of high-intensity movements interspersed with active recovery, followed by a cool-down. Exercises were adapted to be safe and appropriate for older adults, focusing on full-body functional movements and performed in a group setting under professional supervision.
Functional fitness was evaluated using the Senior Fitness Test battery and handgrip strength testing. This included assessments of:
Measurements were taken at three time points: pre-intervention (M1), midpoint (M2), and post-intervention (M3). Statistical analysis included nonparametric ANOVA-type models (Brunner-Langer), given the non-normal distribution of many outcome variables.
The results indicated statistically significant improvements in the HIIT group for several domains of functional fitness compared to the control group. Notably, participants in the HIIT group showed:
These results support the effectiveness of HIIT in improving multiple aspects of physical function among older adults, without the need for resistance machines or prolonged exercise sessions. The findings highlight the feasibility and clinical relevance of using HIIT as a tool to enhance physical independence, prevent disability, and reduce the burden on health systems.
All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Polytechnic Institute of Bragança and followed international guidelines (SPIRIT, CONSORT, Declaration of Helsinki). Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals.
2,426 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 60 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.
Browse Motor Activity studies →Instituto Politécnico de Bragança is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants perform high-intensity interval training (HIIT) sessions three times per week, including aerobic exercises with intervals of effort and recovery, adapted to older adults.
Other: Exercise
Participants maintain their usual daily activities and do not receive any structured exercise intervention during the study period.
Participants engaged in High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) sessions three times per week, each lasting 60 minutes. Sessions included a 10-minute warm-up, a central HIIT block with cycles of aerobic exercises performed at high intensity (30-60 seconds) alternated with active recovery (60-90 seconds), followed by a 10-minute aerobic functional segment and a 10-minute cool-down with stretching. Exercises included modified jumping jacks, stationary marching, high knees, squats, and functional movements tailored to the participants' physical capacity. Training intensity was monitored using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale, targeting 13-17 during effort phases and 9-11 during recovery.
Number of steps completed in the 2-Minute Step Test
Number of steps completed in the 2-Minute Step Test The 2-Minute Step Test assesses aerobic endurance. Participants are instructed to march in place for two minutes, raising the knees to a target height midway between the kneecap and hip. The number of steps completed with the right knee reaching the target is counted.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Handgrip strength (kg)
Maximal isometric strength of the dominant hand measured using a digital handgrip dynamometer (JAMAR®). Participants performed three attempts with 30-second rest intervals; the highest value was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Upper body strength (Arm Curl Test)
Number of repetitions performed using a 2 kg dumbbell (women) or 3 kg (men) in 30 seconds, with the dominant arm.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Lower body strength (30-Second Chair Stand)
Number of full sit-to-stand repetitions completed in 30 seconds, without using arms.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Upper body flexibility (Back Scratch Test)
Distance (in cm) between the middle fingers when reaching behind the back, one hand over the shoulder and the other up the middle of the back.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Lower body flexibility (Chair Sit-and-Reach Test)
Distance (in cm) from fingertips to toes while sitting on a chair and reaching toward the foot with one leg extended.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Agility and dynamic balance (Timed Up and Go Test - TUG)
Time (in seconds) taken to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down again.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Mid-intervention (Week 33), and Post-intervention (Week 65)
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Instituto Politécnico de Bragança