CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07157605SPLENDIDUpdated Jul 22, 2026

Oncological Safety of Spleen Preservation in Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (SPLENDID)

An observational study in Pancreatic Cancer Resectable and Pancreatectomy, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Active, not recruiting at 10 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to determine how often lymph node metastases occur in the splenic hilum and surrounding fat in patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.

The main question the study aims to answer is:

Is spleen removal necessary in all cases, or is the risk of lymph node metastases in the fat around the spleen low enough to reconsider this standard practice?

Currently, spleen removal is part of the standard treatment for patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer to ensure that any potential lymph node metastases in the surrounding fat are also removed. However, the likelihood of metastases in this area is low, and spleen removal carries risks.

This study is a first step toward changing the treatment approach. If the findings show that metastases in the fat around the spleen are rare, the next step will be a randomized trial to further investigate whether spleen removal is necessary.

Read the detailed description

Splenectomy is routinely performed during surgical resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with the primary aim to facilitate adequate lymphadenectomy. However, asplenia is associated with several risks, including overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis, and an increased risk of the development of cancer. Until several years ago, splenectomy was also routine practice in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. Recently, several studies have shown that spleen-preservation in patients with gastric cancer is safe and therefore current guidelines advise against splenectomy. The rate of involved lymph nodes (LNs) in the splenic hilum (LN station 10) described in literature differs from 0 to 10% of patients. In these studies, the definition of the splenic hilum is often unclear and therefore these outcomes are difficult to interpret. Spleen-preservation in left-sided pancreatectomy for PDAC is currently not common practice in The Netherlands and goes against treatment guidelines. Two retrospective studies have suggested that spleenpreservation did not impair oncological outcomes and that postoperative complications occurred less after spleen preservation. However, these studies were retrospective, single-center and only included a very small number of patients and are therefore not providing enough evidence to change current practice. The SPLENDID-project focuses on evaluating the oncological safety of spleen-preservation in patients with left-sided PDAC. A prospective cohort study will be performed including all patients who undergo a left-sided pancreatectomy with splenectomy. The specimens will be transected at the precise level were spleen preservation (with resection of splenic vessels) would be performed (after removal of the specimen). Ratio of LN involvement will be collected for both specimen parts. Additionally, oncological patient outcomes, including survival, will be collected. When the pathological assessment confirms a \<9% LN involvement rate in the perihilar space, the next step will be to assess spleen preservation in an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cancer Resectable
  • Pancreatectomy

Keywords

  • pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • PDAC
  • left pancreatectomy
  • distal pancreatectomy
  • splenectomy
  • splenic hilum
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 512 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients from hospitals performing pancreatic surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • All consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) who undergo an open or minimally invasive (i.e., robot-assisted or laparoscopic) left-sided pancreatectomy with concomitant splenectomy for primary resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced left-sided PDAC

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Tumor involvement or abutment of the spleen
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lymph node metastasis in spleen-part

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Predictors for the occurrence of lymph node metastasis in the spleen-part

    A regression analysis will be performed to determine the predictors for the lymph node metastasis in the spleen part

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Overall and disease-free survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time interval from surgery to death from any cause, and disease-free survival was defined as the time between surgery to either recurrence or death from any cause. 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates will be determined. Also the cause of death will be described.

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

  3. Predictors for overall and disease-free survival

    A multivariable regression analysis will determine independent prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival (including whether lymph node metastases in the spleen part are an independent prognostic factor).

    Time frame: 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year

  4. Recurrence

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

  5. Recurrence-free survival

    defined as the interval between surgery and recurrence, will be determined.

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

  6. Lymph node metastasis (in pancreas-part and overall)

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  7. Identification of left gastroepiploic vessels in spleen-part

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  8. Identification of pancreatic tissue in spleen-part

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  9. Distance from transection plane to tumor

    in pathological assessement

    Time frame: 1 month

  10. Tumor deposits

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. Radical (R0) resection rate

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  12. Histopathological diagnosis

    in pathological assessment

    Time frame: 1 month

  13. Postoperative complications

    Time frame: 90 days

  14. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • BenQ Hospital
    Nanjing, China
  • Konstantopoulio General Hospital
    Athens, Greece
  • Padova University Hospital
    Padova, Italy
  • Kyushu University Hospital
    Fukuoka, Japan
  • Amsterdam UMC
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • OLVG Hospital
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Leiden University Medical Center
    Leiden, Netherlands
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
  • Dr. Peset University Hospital
    Valencia, Spain
  • Linköping University Hospital
    Linköping, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bruna CL, van Hilst J, Esposito A, Kleive D, Falconi M, Primrose JN, Korrel M, Bianchi D, Zerbi A, Kokkola A, Butturini G, Bjornsson B, Morone M, Casadei R, Marudanayagam R, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M; European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS). The value of splenectomy during left-sided pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: predefined subanalysis in the DIPLOMA randomized trial. Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 30;111(9):znae236. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae236. No abstract available. PubMed 39287489 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07157605
Lead sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Responsible party
M.G. Besselink (Professor of Surgery, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 5, 2025
Start date
Nov 28, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Jan 1, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Jony van Hilst, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marc G Besselink, MD, PhD, professor
principal investigator · Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion