CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07151027Updated Feb 10, 2026

Effectiveness Of Alcohol Addition In Ultrasound-Guided Periarticular Sacroiliac Joint Injection

An interventional study of sacroiliac joint injection and sacroiliac joint injection in Sacro Iliac Joint Pain, Low Back Pain and Alcohol Induced Neurolysis, sponsored by Fayoum University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-10.

Sponsored by Fayoum University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this work is to evaluate the efficacy of adding alcohol to local anesthetics and steroids to provide pain relief in patients with sacroiliac joint pain.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common health problems globally. According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021, low back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability worldwide. It affects approximately 619 million people globally, and this number is projected to increase to 843 million by 2050 due to population growth and aging. (1) LBP may arise from multiple anatomical structures, such as muscle, intervertebral disc, fascia, and facet joint. Another common cause of LBP includes the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). It is estimated that around 10-38% of LBP cases originated from the SIJ. (2) In addition to its prevalence, SIJ pain lacks valid clinical/diagnostic tests and no therapeutic modalities for long-term improvement have been found yet. (3) Treatment of SIJ pain is another dilemma, and a wide range of therapeutic modalities has been used, including pharmacotherapy, chiropractic manipulation, SIJ injection (local anesthetics, steroid, or mixture), and surgical fixation. (4) Steroid and local anesthetic (LA) injections are widely used for managing SIJ pain, and evidence supports their effectiveness, particularly in the short to intermediate term but long-term benefit usually requires repeat injections or alternative treatments as radiofrequency or prolotherapy (5,6,7) Recently, alcohol neurolysis has gained popularity and become a well-established interventional technique in pain management, particularly for patients with chronic or cancer-related pain that is refractory to conventional therapies. (8)

Alcohol (Ethanol) in different concentrations (from 70% to 20%) has been used in different joints and pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia, post-mastectomy pain syndrome, ankle pain from Morton neuroma and bursitis, and it proved its efficacy and safety. (9,10,11,12) Previous studies tried phenol injection in SIJ pain which acts nearly with the same mechanism of action as ethanol exerting a neurolytic effect through protein denaturation and nerve fiber destruction. Also proved its efficacy and safety. (13, 14) No previous studies used alcohol injection in SIJ.This study hypothesize that the use of alcohol (ethanol) 30% as an adjuvant to steroids and local anesthetics in SIJ as a novel approach may offer both short and long-term pain relief and reduce the frequency of repeated injections.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sacro Iliac Joint Pain
  • Low Back Pain
  • Alcohol Induced Neurolysis

Keywords

  • Sacroiliatis
  • sacroiliac joint injection
  • prolotherapy
  • ethanol in low back pain
  • pain management
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is close to the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Fayoum University is the lead sponsor of 144 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult patients of either gender diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain.
  2. Patient aged 18-60 years old.
  3. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  4. Chronic pain at sacroiliac joint for more than 12 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with MRI confirmed other cause of Low back pain as (disc prolapse, spinal canal stenosis, etc.).
  2. Patients without any positive provocative tests (FABER, Gaenslen's and Fortin's finger tests).
  3. Patients had findings suggestive of another source of axial back pain.
  4. Patients with symptoms radiating past the knee.
  5. Patients with less than 5/5 strength in the lower extremity.
  6. Patients with diminished reflexes.
  7. Patients diagnosed with myelopathy, and positive neural tension signs including straight leg raise and/or slump test.
  8. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²).
  9. Infection at the injection site.
  10. Patients who have undergone previous spine or pelvic surgery.
  11. Coagulation disorders as bleeding tendency and platelet dysfunction.
  12. Allergy to local anesthetics.
  13. Patients with mental disorders, as well as drug abuse.
  14. Lumbar facet steroid injections within the past 12 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group (group A)

    receives a mixture of alcohol 30%, dexamethasone and lidocaine 2%

    Procedure: sacroiliac joint injection

  • Active comparator
    Active comparator group (group D)

    receives a mixture of dexamethasone and lidocaine 2%

    Procedure: sacroiliac joint injection

Interventions

  • Proceduresacroiliac joint injection

    US-guided periarticular sacroiliac joint injection of a mixture of dexamethasone and lidocaine 2%

  • Proceduresacroiliac joint injection

    US-guided periarticular sacroiliac joint injection of a mixture of alcohol 30%, dexamethasone and lidocaine 2%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain relief as measured by the visual analogue scale VAS scale

    Presented by a 10 cm horizontal line representing the patient's pain intensity. Zero represents "no pain" while the upper limit (10 cm) represents the "worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: preoperative(baseline), immediate after injection, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 4 months and 6 months after injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    is a questionnaire designed to assess the degree of disability in low back pain. It comprises 10 sections, pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual activity, social life, and traveling. Each section is scored on a scale from 0 to 5, the total score is calculated by summing section scores, dividing by the maximum possible score, and multiplying by 100 to yield a percentage from 0 to 100% .with higher percentages denoting more severe disability. The total score is the number of questions with a positive response (yes) and reduction in four or more scores indicates that the treatment has achieved its goal.

    Time frame: preoperative(baseline), immediate after injection, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 4 months and 6 months after injection

  2. Patient Satisfaction Score (PSS)

    a self reported measure of a patient's overall satisfaction with care, a 5 point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

    Time frame: within 15 minutes after the procedure completion

  3. Time to first postoperative analgesic dose

    interval (in hours) from completion of the sacroiliac joint injection to the patient's first request for analgesia recorded by nursing staff then patient and his relatives after discharge. A longer time to first dose indicates more prolonged analgesic effect of the injection.

    Time frame: interval (in hours) for the first 48 hours

  4. Cumulative Gabapentin consumption

    Time frame: 1 week, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 4 months and 6 months after injection.

  5. Procedure discomfort

    Procedure discomfort via VAS scale

    Time frame: within 15 minutes after the procedure completion

  6. Complications

    I. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV). II. Hyperalgesia III. Loss of Sensation IV. Lower Limb Muscle Weakness V. Infection at Injection Site

    Time frame: six months after injection

07

Study locations

1 site
  • FayoumU
    Al Fayyum, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07151027
Lead sponsor
Fayoum University
Responsible party
Maged Shawky Farhat Gergis (Doctor, Fayoum University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 2, 2025
Start date
Aug 25, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Feb 1, 2026
Last update
Feb 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion