CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07139197Updated Sep 4, 2025

The Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-Based Psychoeducation on Cognitive Flexibility and Rumination in the Elderly

An interventional study of Cognitive Behavioral Approach-Based Psychoeducation Program in Cognitive Flexibility, Rumination and Elderly (People Aged 65 or More), sponsored by Ataturk University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Ataturk University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to investigate the effect of psychoeducation on rumination and cognitive flexibility in elderly individuals residing in nursing homes. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-based psychoeducation has recently been applied to multiple specific groups around the world and in our country. In general, executive functioning skills and, more specifically, cognitive flexibility appear to be important for the ability to use certain CBT techniques; however, considering that these skills naturally decline with age, further research is needed. It is anticipated that the results of this study will contribute to applications in the field of psychiatric nursing.

Read the detailed description

Aging causes neuroanatomical and physiological changes that affect cognitive processes such as memory, attention, and executive functions. Positive developments in healthcare worldwide, along with increasing socioeconomic levels and declining birth rates, have led to an increase in the elderly population. Our country, like many other countries around the world, is one of the rapidly aging countries. With the increase in the elderly population, the needs specific to the elderly are increasing, and it is inevitable to encounter a series of problems.

As age increases, the cognitive abilities of older adults decline. Research shows that working memory and long-term memory abilities decline, as do reasoning ability, processing speed, executive function, and attention control. As a result, individuals' quality of life, independence, and daily activities such as planning medication and grocery shopping may be negatively affected.

Cognitive flexibility plays a fundamental role in the ability to adapt to constantly changing environments and is associated with various goal-directed behaviors, including creativity, problem solving, multitasking, and decision making. Cognitive flexibility and the underlying processes (executive functions) have also been linked to self- and emotional regulation, as well as mental health outcomes. Cognitive flexibility refers to the ability to change one's cognitive organization, thinking, or attention in order to perceive, process, or respond to situations in different ways. The skills required for cognitive restructuring closely align with those related to cognitive flexibility. Cognitive flexibility encompasses the ability to generate diverse ideas, evaluate response alternatives, and modify behavior and cognition in response to changing environmental demands. These processes appear to be important for the successful implementation of cognitive restructuring, which requires the individual to identify negative automatic thoughts, generate evidence that contradicts these thoughts, and then produce a more adaptive or helpful way of interpreting the situation.

Rumination is associated with inflexible cognitive and emotional processes. Various characteristics of rumination-related thinking, including its negative value content, abstract level of interpretation, and passive approach to problem-solving, may also contribute to its maladaptive outcomes.

In order to successfully carry out daily activities, it is necessary to be able to flexibly switch from one behavior to another. This skill is referred to as cognitive flexibility. Individuals who ruminate experience cognitive rigidity by getting stuck on a certain thought and find it difficult to change the behaviors they focus on. At the same time, cognitive rigidity is also thought to be the underlying cause of repetitive thinking patterns in rumination. It is well known that mental rumination, a negative and evaluative mode of repetitive thinking, is the main psychological process that accelerates and sustains depressive mood. In this context, rumination may be a variable that predicts cognitive flexibility. In particular, perseverative thinking styles have been found to negatively affect the ability to learn cognitive restructuring. Further research is needed to clarify whether older adults with weak cognitive flexibility can develop their cognitive restructuring skills through repetition rather than treatment, or whether alternative skills should be considered.

To date, there has been little research examining whether declines in cognitive abilities have an impact on overall treatment outcomes or the acquisition of specific therapeutic skills. Given the aging of the world's population, it is important to focus more research on understanding the impact of age-related cognitive changes in older adults on the treatment of mental health problems. This study will focus on cognitive flexibility and rumination, which are processes responsible for producing changes in behavior and thought in dynamic contexts and are subject to fluctuations and rapid changes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Flexibility
  • Rumination
  • Elderly (People Aged 65 or More)
  • Psychoeducation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • elderly
  • psychoeducation
  • cognitive flexibility
  • rumination
  • cognitive behavioral therapy
03

In context

Rumination Syndrome

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Rumination Syndrome; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 38 is below the median of 62 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Rumination Syndrome.

Browse Rumination Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Ataturk University is the lead sponsor of 442 studies on the registry; 121 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Be 65 years of age or older,
  • Be willing to participate in the study,
  • Not have hearing or vision problems that would prevent understanding the training to be provided,
  • Have communication and comprehension skills,
  • Be literate,
  • Have a Standardized Mini Mental Test score between 25 and 30 points.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having any hearing or vision problems.
  • Having physical, neurological, or psychological health problems that could disrupt group harmony and integrity.
  • Having an illness or problem that could prevent them from responding to the measurement tools used in the study.
  • Having a Standardized Mini Mental Test score below 25.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-Based Psychoeducation Program

    Participants in this group will receive a cognitive-behavioral psychoeducation program aimed at improving cognitive flexibility and reducing rumination. Pre-test assessments will be conducted before group allocation.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Approach-Based Psychoeducation Program

  • No intervention
    Control Group: Usual Care (Standard Nursing Home Care)

    Participants in this group will not be subject to any intervention during the study period. Pre-test assessments will be conducted by an independent evaluator simultaneously with the intervention group. Upon completion of the study, control group participants will be offered the opportunity to participate in the psycho-education program if they wish.

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioral Approach-Based Psychoeducation Program

    Intervention Group: Cognitive Behavioral Approach-Based Psychoeducation Program Participants will receive a cognitive-behavioral psychoeducation program designed to improve cognitive flexibility and reduce rumination. The sessions include structured activities, discussions, and exercises based on cognitive-behavioral principles. Pre-test assessments will be conducted before group allocation. Control Group: No intervention will be provided during the study period. Participants will complete pre-test assessments administered by an independent evaluator. After the study concludes, control group participants will be offered the opportunity to participate in the psychoeducation program if they wish.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive Flexibility Inventory

    The inventory was adapted into Turkish. The five-point Likert-type inventory consists of two subscales, "alternatives" and "control," and 20 items. The "alternatives" subscale consists of statements regarding the possibility of finding alternative solutions to difficult situations or alternative explanations for life circumstances and human behavior. The "control" subscale consists of statements about the controllability of difficult situations. The lowest possible score on the inventory is 20, and the highest possible score is 100. Items 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, and 17 of the scale are reverse-coded. High scores on the inventory indicate high cognitive flexibility. In the Turkish version of the inventory, the Cronbach's alfa coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) was calculated as .90 for the entire inventory, .90 for the alternatives subscale, and .84 for the control subscale.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Self-Critical Rumination Scale

    The scale was adapted into Turkish. The scale is a unidimensional scale with a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Never, 2 = Somewhat, 3 = Mostly, 4 = Completely). The scale's fit indices were found to be chi-square/degrees of freedom (x²/df) = 3, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = .08, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = .93, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = .94, and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) = .04. In criterion-related validity, the correlation between the Ruminative Responses Scale short form (RRS) and the RRS was found to be r = .73, with the obsessive thinking subscale r = .73 and the deep thinking subscale r = .68. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was Cronbach's alfa coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) = .89, and the test-retest reliability coefficient, measured five weeks apart, was .83.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT)

    A standardized version of the test was created, taking into account sociocultural differences in our country. This test consists of five subcategories-orientation, memory, attention and calculation, recall, and language-and 11 items. It is scored out of a total of 30 points, with each correct answer earning one point. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest possible score is 30. A score between 0 and 12 indicates severe cognitive impairment, a score between 13 and 22 indicates moderate cognitive impairment, a score between 23 and 24 indicates early-stage cognitive impairment, and a score between 25 and 30 indicates no cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: 1 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kars Huzurevi Yaşlı Bakım ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi / Kars Huzur Evi Elderly Care and Rehabilitation Center
    Kars, Center 36100, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Leyla Altun, Research Assistant/PhD student · Contact · leyla.altun.3695@gmail.com · +90 545 650 57 82
    • Özlem ŞAHİN ALTUN, Assistant Professor, Ph.D. · Contact · ozlemsahinaltun@gmail.com · +90 530 289 52 92
    • Leyla ALTUN, Research Assistant · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07139197
Lead sponsor
Ataturk University
Responsible party
Leyla ALTUN (Research Assistant, Ataturk University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Study contacts

Leyla ALTUN, Research Assistant/PhD student
Contact
leyla.altun21@ogr.atauni.edu.tr
+90 545 650 57 82
Özlem Şahin ALTUN, Associate Professor, Ph.D.
Contact
ozlemsahinaltun@gmail.com
+90 530 289 52 92

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion