CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07136298Updated Aug 22, 2025

Seizure Identification on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

An observational study in Seizures, sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-22.

Sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this project is to assess the ability of different groups of National Heath Service (NHS) professionals to correctly identify clinical seizures, and distinguish them from other movements commonly seen in the ICU environment, when shown digital video recordings only.

Patients on the ICU are at risk of having seizures, however also commonly make other movements, including shivering, jerking, tics and tremors. An Electroencephalogram (EEG) records the brain wave activity and can help distinguish epileptic seizures from other movements. In a study by Bendadis et al (2010), 52 video-EEGs were reviewed containing "possible seizures" on the ICU. They found only 27% recorded actual epileptic events, with the other 73% having a range of other movements. Malone et al (2009) studied accuracy of diagnosis of 20 video recordings of clinical episodes on the neonatal unit, comparing different staff groups. They found no significant difference between Doctors and Nurses in correctly identifying seizures, however found that accuracy of diagnosis was generally poor.

Clinical scientists are currently expanding their roles and responsibilities across Neurophysiology, including giving consultant-level advice on EEG investigations. EEG recordings on the ICU are often obscured by excessive, unavoidable electrical/movement artefacts caused by equipment such ventilators and pumps, and patient factors such as position, breathing artefact and suctioning. These make the EEG difficult to interpret (Boggs 2021). Assessing the clinical signs and symptoms which we may see in ICU patients, in the absence of interpretable EEG, is an essential skill.

This study aims to assess Clinical Scientists skills at clinical interpretation, in comparison with other staff groups in the ICU setting. Staff will be asked to watch video clips of events captured in the ICU, and tell us whether they think they are seizures or not, and explain their thought process behind the decision.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seizures

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Intensive Care
  • Clinical Scientist
  • Neurologists
  • Intensivists
  • ITU Nurses
03

In context

Seizures

881 studies on the registry are indexed under Seizures; 144 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 150 across 235 observational studies indexed under Seizures.

Browse Seizures studies →

Lead sponsor

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population are staff working in the Adult ICU at Nottingham University Hospitals, in one of the following groups; Neurophysiology Scientists/Clinical Physiologists, Neurophysiologists, Neurologists, Intensivists, Advanced Clinical Practitioners and Nursing Staff

Inclusion criteria

Staff working at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) in one of the following staff groups;

  • Neurophysiology Scientists/Clinical Physiologists at Band 7 level and above,
  • Neurophysiologists who have completed the CCT in Neurophysiology with at least 1 year of Adult ICU experience.
  • members of the Neurology medical team with at least 1 years' experience of covering ITU
  • Intensivists with at least 1 year's experience working on the Adult intensive care unit
  • Nursing staff working on the Intensive care unit with at least 1 year's experience

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Staff not employed by NUH i.e. agency staff
  • Staff in other groups not mentioned above
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Clinical Scientists

    Other: Clinical Opinion

  • Advanced Clinical Practitioners

    Other: Clinical Opinion

  • Intensivists

    Other: Clinical Opinion

  • Clinical Neurophysiologists

    Other: Clinical Opinion

  • Neurologists

    Other: Clinical Opinion

  • ICU Nurses

    Other: Clinical Opinion

Interventions

  • OtherClinical Opinion

    Staff participants will be asked to review video clips of events captured during EEGs performed on the ICU and asked to state whether they think the event was an epileptic seizure or not, and what aspects of each event led them to that decision

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Level of Agreement

    The primary outcome measure is the level of agreement between the clinical opinion of the different staff groups and the EEG result

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Interrater Reliability

    The level of agreement between the different individuals in each staff group.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Thematic Analysis

    thematic analysis of the decision making process (based on the free text justifications for why individuals made the choice they did)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Nottingham University Hospitals
    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07136298
Lead sponsor
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
Start date
Mar 3, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 22, 2025

Study contacts

James S Baird
Contact
james.baird@nhs.net
01159709146

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion