An observational study in Seizures, sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-22.
Sponsored by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational
The aim of this project is to assess the ability of different groups of National Heath Service (NHS) professionals to correctly identify clinical seizures, and distinguish them from other movements commonly seen in the ICU environment, when shown digital video recordings only.
Patients on the ICU are at risk of having seizures, however also commonly make other movements, including shivering, jerking, tics and tremors. An Electroencephalogram (EEG) records the brain wave activity and can help distinguish epileptic seizures from other movements. In a study by Bendadis et al (2010), 52 video-EEGs were reviewed containing "possible seizures" on the ICU. They found only 27% recorded actual epileptic events, with the other 73% having a range of other movements. Malone et al (2009) studied accuracy of diagnosis of 20 video recordings of clinical episodes on the neonatal unit, comparing different staff groups. They found no significant difference between Doctors and Nurses in correctly identifying seizures, however found that accuracy of diagnosis was generally poor.
Clinical scientists are currently expanding their roles and responsibilities across Neurophysiology, including giving consultant-level advice on EEG investigations. EEG recordings on the ICU are often obscured by excessive, unavoidable electrical/movement artefacts caused by equipment such ventilators and pumps, and patient factors such as position, breathing artefact and suctioning. These make the EEG difficult to interpret (Boggs 2021). Assessing the clinical signs and symptoms which we may see in ICU patients, in the absence of interpretable EEG, is an essential skill.
This study aims to assess Clinical Scientists skills at clinical interpretation, in comparison with other staff groups in the ICU setting. Staff will be asked to watch video clips of events captured in the ICU, and tell us whether they think they are seizures or not, and explain their thought process behind the decision.
881 studies on the registry are indexed under Seizures; 144 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 150 across 235 observational studies indexed under Seizures.
Browse Seizures studies →Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The study population are staff working in the Adult ICU at Nottingham University Hospitals, in one of the following groups; Neurophysiology Scientists/Clinical Physiologists, Neurophysiologists, Neurologists, Intensivists, Advanced Clinical Practitioners and Nursing Staff
Staff working at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) in one of the following staff groups;
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Clinical Opinion
Other: Clinical Opinion
Other: Clinical Opinion
Other: Clinical Opinion
Other: Clinical Opinion
Other: Clinical Opinion
Staff participants will be asked to review video clips of events captured during EEGs performed on the ICU and asked to state whether they think the event was an epileptic seizure or not, and what aspects of each event led them to that decision
Level of Agreement
The primary outcome measure is the level of agreement between the clinical opinion of the different staff groups and the EEG result
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Interrater Reliability
The level of agreement between the different individuals in each staff group.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Thematic Analysis
thematic analysis of the decision making process (based on the free text justifications for why individuals made the choice they did)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust