CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07134660Updated Mar 30, 2026

Thoracic Surgery Intercostal Block Trial With Liposomal vs. Hydrochloride Bupivacaine

An interventional study of Liposomal Bupivacaine intercostal nerve block and Bupivacaine Hydrochloride intercostal nerve block in Postoperative Pain, Acute and Lung Cancer, sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the analgesic effects of liposomal bupivacaine compared to bupivacaine hydrochloride in intercostal nerve block for patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery. Postoperative pain remains a significant issue in thoracic procedures, often leading to complications like pneumonia or delayed recovery. The investigators hypothesize that liposomal bupivacaine, with its extended-release properties, will provide superior pain relief beyond 24 hours compared to standard bupivacaine or no block. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to liposomal bupivacaine group , bupivacaine hydrochloride group , or control group . Primary outcome is the area under the curve of pain scores from 25-72 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, recovery quality (QoR-15), and other complications.

Read the detailed description

Background: Lung cancer surgery, even with minimally invasive thoracoscopy, causes significant postoperative pain in up to 62.9% of patients, potentially leading to complications and chronic pain. Intercostal nerve block is a safe alternative to epidural analgesia, but standard local anesthetics like bupivacaine provide limited duration (\<8 hours). Liposomal bupivacaineoffers prolonged release up to 72 hours.

Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine hydrochloride in intercostal nerve block, assessing pain scores, opioid use, recovery quality, and complications in thoracoscopic lung surgery patients.

Design: Multicenter, randomized controlled trial with 210 participants (70 per group). Randomization with (1:1:1).

Methods: Eligible patients receive ultrasound-guided intercostal block post-surgery: Liposomal bupivacaine (20 mL, 266 mg), bupivacaine HCl (20 mL, 0.25%), or control (IV PCA only). Follow-up includes pain scores, opioid consumption, QoR-15, and adverse events up to 72 hours.

Expected Outcomes: Liposomal bupivacaine expected to reduce pain AUC by >10% vs. bupivacaine and >15% vs. control from 25-72 hours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain, Acute
  • Lung Cancer

Keywords

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Intercostal Nerve Block
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China is the lead sponsor of 149 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for elective unilateral thoracoscopic (VATS) lung surgery
  • Age 18 to 80 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to local anesthetics (infection at puncture site, allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy or other bleeding risk)
  • Sensory abnormalities in the planned chest-wall surgical area
  • Hepatic dysfunction (ALT > 50 U/L, AST > 40 U/L, or total bilirubin ≥ 19 μmol/L) or renal dysfunction (serum creatinine > 112 μmol/L, BUN > 7.1 mmol/L, or dialysis within 28 days before surgery)
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, women of childbearing potential not using adequate contraception, or planning pregnancy during the study period
  • Preoperative opioid use, history of chronic pain, or history of opioid abuse
  • Refusal to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liposomal Bupivacaine Group

    Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block performed at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia using liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg (20 mL). Patients also receive standard postoperative analgesia with IV PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) opioids and regular acetaminophen

    Procedure: Liposomal Bupivacaine intercostal nerve block

  • Active comparator
    Bupivacaine Hydrochloride Group

    Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block performed at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia using 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride (20 mL). Patients also receive standard postoperative analgesia with IV PCA opioids and regular acetaminophen

    Procedure: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride intercostal nerve block

  • Sham comparator
    Control Group (Standard Analgesia Only)

    No intercostal nerve block, just wait same time. Patients receive standard postoperative analgesia consisting of IV PCA opioids and regular acetaminophen, beginning immediately after surgery.

    Other: Standard Postoperative Analgesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureLiposomal Bupivacaine intercostal nerve block

    Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg (20 mL total; 4 mL per intercostal space at the incision and adjacent spaces), performed at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia. All patients receive standard postoperative analgesia with intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia.

  • ProcedureBupivacaine Hydrochloride intercostal nerve block

    Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride (20 mL total; 4 mL per intercostal space at the incision and adjacent spaces), performed at the end of surgery before emergence from anesthesia. All patients receive standard postoperative analgesia with intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia.

  • OtherStandard Postoperative Analgesia

    No intercostal nerve block. Patients receive standard postoperative analgesia consisting of an intravenous patient-controlled opioid pump per institutional protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score area under the curve (AUC) from 25 to 72 hours postoperatively

    Area under the curve of postoperative pain intensity measured on the VRS. AUC is computed over the 25-72 h interval. Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Verbal Response Scale (VRS), the score ranges from 0 to 10, with a total of 11 numbers corresponding to different pain levels: 0 indicates no pain; 1-3 indicates mild pain (tolerable and does not affect sleep); 4-6 indicates moderate pain (significant, affects sleep, and requires medication for relief); and 7-10 indicates severe pain (intense, intolerable, and severely affects life).

    Time frame: 25 to 72 hours after the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain score at PACU discharge and postoperative intervals

    Pain intensity assessed using the VRS in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Verbal Response Scale (VRS), the score ranges from 0 to 10, with a total of 11 numbers corresponding to different pain levels: 0 indicates no pain; 1-3 indicates mild pain (tolerable and does not affect sleep); 4-6 indicates moderate pain (significant, affects sleep, and requires medication for relief); and 7-10 indicates severe pain (intense, intolerable, and severely affects life).Rescue analgesia is provided if VRS \>4.

    Time frame: At PACU discharge, and 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

  2. Cumulative opioid consumption

    Total postoperative opioid use converted to morphine milligram equivalents.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery to 48 hours after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Duration of chest wall analgesia

    Time from performance of the intercostal nerve block (end of surgery) to return of chest-wall sensation, as determined by cold and pinprick testing at predefined chest-wall sites.

    Time frame: From intervention (end of surgery) up to 7 days

  2. Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score

    Measured by the QoR-15 questionnaire (15 items, total score 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery).

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

  3. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Number of patients of nausea or vomiting recorded at 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively

  4. Incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications

    Occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications-including pneumonia, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and aspiration-defined by CDC and Berlin criteria.

    Time frame: From intervention (end of surgery) up to 7 days

  5. Length of hospital stay

    Time from end of surgery to discharge, measured in days.

    Time frame: From intervention (end of surgery) up to 7 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Huang J, Wang L, Wei S, Xin Y, Chang R, Liu H, Yang Y, Song J, Lv X. Comparison of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine hydrochloride intercostal nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery: a multicenter, randomized, three arms trial protocol. Ann Med. 2026 Dec;58(1):2612384. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2612384. Epub 2026 Jan 20. PubMed 41560407 ↗
  • Yu J, Wei S, Ling D, Xin Y, Liu H, Yang Y, Li X, Xiang Z, Liu J. Effective Dose of Oliceridine for Inhibiting Hemodynamic Elevation Induced by Tracheal Intubation: An Up-and-Down Sequential Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Dec 26;19:11767-11778. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S567868. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41477178 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07134660
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
Responsible party
Shiyou Wei (Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

Shiyou Wei, PhD
Contact
lovewishyou@163.com
8615601680288
Xin Lv, PhD
Contact
xinlvg@126.com
8618852869700
Xin Y Lv, PhD
study director · Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion