CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07134309Updated Aug 21, 2025

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates in Women With Non-Specific Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Exercise Training in Mechanical Low Back Pain, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-21.

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2021, registered Aug 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In this study, the effects of instrumental pilates, mat pilates and general posture exercises on pain, disability, quality of life, flexibility and endurance of trunk extension muscles were researched in women with non-specific low back pain. The aim of this study was to examine the superiority of exercises over each other.

Read the detailed description

The participants were divided into three groups as reformer pilates group, mat pilates group and control group. Patients were allocated to the groups according to order of arrival starting from the reformer pilates group using a simple basic randomization method. All assessments were performed face to face by the physiotherapist. Exercise follow-up was performed individually. Pain intensity, level of disability, flexibility values, quality of life, and trunk extension endurance times were evaluated before and after treatment. Reformer, mat pilates, and general posture exercise training were performed twice a weekly for 12 weeks. In evaluation, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used for pain intensity, Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire for disability, Short Form - 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) for quality of life, Sit-lie test for flexibility, McGill extension test for trunk extension endurance. Demographic information of individuals was recorded.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • reformer pilates
  • mat pilates
  • posture exercises
  • pain
  • functional disability
  • quality of life
03

In context

Low Back Pain

2,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Low Back Pain; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is below the median of 60 across 2,268 interventional studies indexed under Low Back Pain.

Browse Low Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 228 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • being a woman between the ages of 18 and 50
  • having a diagnosis of NLBP
  • not having any obstacles to exercise.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To be pregnant, history of previous spine surgery, rheumatic diseases that may cause low back pain, severe spinal pathologies (tumor, fracture, etc.).
  • having received physiotherapy for spine health in the last 6 months and receiving any analgesic or anti-inflammatory medical treatment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Instrumental Pilates

    Instrumental pilates group received reformer Pilates for 12 weeks.

    Other: Exercise Training

  • Experimental
    Mat Pilates

    Mat pilates group received mat Pilates training for 12 weeks.

    Other: Exercise Training

  • Experimental
    Posture Exercises

    The third group received posture exercise training for 12 weeks

    Other: Exercise Training

Interventions

  • OtherExercise Training

    Reformer, mat pilates, and general posture exercise training were performed twice a weekly for 12 weeks. Before starting pilates training, the key elements of pilates were taught to patients for one session. In evaluation, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used for pain intensity, Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire for disability, Short Form - 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) for quality of life, Sit-lie test for flexibility, McGill extension test for trunk extension endurance. Demographic information of individuals was recorded.

    Also known as: Pilates and posture exercises

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire: There are 10 subheadings in this Questionnaire.There are six options under each heading.In each section, options are scored between 0-5.The lowest score obtained as a result of the survey is "0" and the highest score is "50". The level of functional disability increases with increasing total score.

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks training immediately after the intervention

  2. Pain Level

    Visual Pain Scale: '0' indicates no pain, '10' indicates severe pain. As the score increases, the level of pain worsens.

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks training immediately after the intervention

  3. Flexibility

    Sit and Reach test: A test box with a ruler was used. The participants placed their feet on the corners of the box without shoes.The data was recorded in centimetres. The corner of the test box is considered to be 0,Values extending further from the edge of the cube were accepted as positive, while values beyond were accepted as negative .

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks training immediately after the intervention

  4. Quality of Life Level

    Short Form-36 Questionnaire: It has 8 subscales of health- related quality of life that examine physical functioning (10 items). Each subscale is calculated separately. In the questionnaire, a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 points are awarded.. A score of '0' indicates poor health, while a score of '100' indicates good health.

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks training immediately after the intervention

  5. Trunk Extension Endurance

    The McGill trunk extension test: The time the individuals were able to maintain the position was recorded in seconds.Minimum and maximum values depend on participants.

    Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks training immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07134309
Lead sponsor
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2025
Start date
Dec 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2023
Completion
Jun 1, 2023
Last update
Aug 21, 2025

Study contacts

Emine Kübra AY, RA
principal investigator · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Bahar ANAFOROĞLU, PROF
study director · Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion