CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07127835PANDASUpdated Apr 29, 2026

Provocation After Nurse-Directed Assessment (PANDA) Study

An observational study in Drug Allergy and Penicillin Allergy, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 4 sites in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-29.

Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
440
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a collaborative nurse-allergist approach in penicillin allergy delabeling services. It also seeks to assess the impact on patients' quality of life and compare resource utilization and cost-effectiveness between the nurse-allergist collaborative approach and the traditional allergist-led approach.

Read the detailed description

This study hypothesizes that by involving both nurses and allergists in the delabeling process and categorizing patients based on risk levels, it will achieve comparable success rates, safety, and improvements in patients' quality of life. This approach is expected to offer superior advantages in terms of time efficiency, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness compared to traditional allergist-led services.

02

Conditions studied

  • Drug Allergy
  • Penicillin Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nurse-led Service
  • Drug Provocation Test
  • Delabelling
03

In context

Drug Hypersensitivity

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Drug Hypersensitivity; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 440 is above the median of 200 across 28 observational studies indexed under Drug Hypersensitivity.

Browse Drug Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,262 studies on the registry; 340 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients treated at a participating hospital who have a documented penicillin allergy label, are evaluated for penicillin allergy through either the nurse-allergist or allergist-led approach, and have available demographic and clinical data.

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving inpatient or outpatient treatment at a participating hospital during the study period;
  • Possessing a documented penicillin allergy label;
  • Underwent penicillin allergy evaluation by the nurse-allergist collaborative approach or the traditional allergist-led approach
  • Demographic and clinical data required for the study available.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to provide a complete medication history or history of penicillin allergy;
  • Patients with only emergency or short-term treatment records;
  • Patients who have taken steroids, antihistamines, or similar medications within the last 3 days.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
440 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Nurse-led group

    Receive Nurse-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

    Diagnostic Test: Nurse-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

  • Allergist-led group

    Receive Allergist-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

    Diagnostic Test: Allergist-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNurse-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

    Patients in this group undergo risk assessment and categorization by nurses to identify low-risk individuals for delabeling. For these patients, nurses will collaborate with allergists in the delabeling process.

  • Diagnostic testAllergist-led penicillin allergy delabelling service

    Patients assigned to this group will undergo risk assessment and delabeling led by allergists for both low-risk and high-risk cases.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Delabelling Success Rate

    Assess the proportion of low-risk patients who are no longer considered allergic to penicillin after delabeling.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Measure changes in patients' quality of life before and after delabeling using the validated Drug Hypersensitivity Quality of Life Questionnaire (DrHy-Q). The DrHy-Q is a 15-item instrument answered on a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 15 (no QoL impairment) to 225 (worst QoL impairment).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Antibiotic Usage Rate

    Evaluate changes in the usage rates of penicillin and alternative antibiotics after delabeling.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Age Group Analysis

    Compare delabeling success rates across different age groups (e.g., 18-30 years, 31-50 years, and 51 years and older).

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Immunocompetence Status

    Analyze differences in delabeling success rates and safety between immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Initial vs. Recurrent Labeling

    Compare delabeling success rates between patients with an initial penicillin allergy label and those with recurrent labels.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital
    Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • Princess Margaret Hospital
    Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
  • Queen Mary Hospital
    Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schnyder B, Pichler WJ. Mechanisms of drug-induced allergy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Mar;84(3):268-72. doi: 10.4065/84.3.268. PubMed 19252115 ↗
  • Abrams EM, Khan DA. Diagnosing and managing drug allergy. CMAJ. 2018 Apr 30;190(17):E532-E538. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171315. No abstract available. PubMed 29712672 ↗
  • Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Lloyd JF, Burke JP. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA. 1997 Jan 22-29;277(4):301-6. PubMed 9002492 ↗
  • Pourpak Z, Fazlollahi MR, Fattahi F. Understanding adverse drug reactions and drug allergies: principles, diagnosis and treatment aspects. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2008 Jan;2(1):24-46. doi: 10.2174/187221308783399289. PubMed 19075990 ↗
  • Patton K, Borshoff DC. Adverse drug reactions. Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73 Suppl 1:76-84. doi: 10.1111/anae.14143. PubMed 29313907 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07127835
Lead sponsor
The University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
Prof. Sophia Siu-chee Chan (Prof., The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 17, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 29, 2026

Study contacts

Elaine Lee
Contact
le446@hku.hk
852 9440 3349

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion