CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07124806Updated Aug 15, 2025

Comparison of Two Botox Injection Techniques to Improve Gait

An interventional study of Botulinum toxin guided by ultrasonography and anatomical references and Botulinum neurotoxin guided by ultrasonography and in vivo location of innervation zones guided by high-density electromyography in Muscle Spasticity, Stroke Sequelae and Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile. Completed at 2 sites in Chile. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-15.

Sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2022, registered Aug 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

According to our hypothesis, the use of HD-EMG shall allow an accurate localization of the innervations zones of the muscles, offering a better complement to the methodology applied so far to define the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection site. To achieve that goal, a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of two guiding methods to define the BoNT injection site in the gastrocnemius muscles will be conducted. One arm will be guided with ultrasonography + localized IZ using anatomical references; while the second arm with ultrasonography + in vivo location of the IZ through HD-EMG. The effectiveness will be evaluated by changes in functional tests and in biomechanical parameters of the gait assessed with a three-dimensional motion analysis system. These outcomes will be measured at baseline (T0), at three (T3w) and six weeks (T6w), post BoNT injection. The differences between sessions will be evaluated as measurements of effectiveness. We expect that greater effectiveness will be found in the group that receives the injection of BoNT, guided by the in vivo location of the IZ.

Read the detailed description

This research proposal seeks to improve the current procedures to determinate the botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection site. More precisely, we propose to complement the ultrasonography with an in vivo location of the IZ, using a non-invasive technique based on surface multielectrode electromyography grid, which is called high density-surface EMG (HD-EMG). According to our hypothesis, the use of HD-EMG shall allow an accurate localization of the IZs of the muscles, offering a better complement to the methodology applied so far to define the BoNT injection site. To achieve that goal, a randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of two guiding methods to define the BoNT injection site in the gastrocnemius muscles (main ankle extensors or plantar flexors) will be conducted. One arm will be treated with the best available option, which includes ultrasonography + localized IZ using anatomical references. The second arm will be managed using ultrasonography + in vivo location of the IZ through. The last will be measured using HD-EMG by recording the motor unit action potentials along the muscle fibers. This technique can identify the location of the IZ by the change of phase of those potentials. The effectiveness will be evaluated by changes in biomechanical parameters of the gait, assessed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The outcomes will be biomechanical gait variables associated with the ankle joint (ankle joint moment, dorsiflexion range, among others) and functional tests (spasticity using Ashworth scale, 6-minute walk test and the Timed Up and Go Test). These outcomes will be evaluated at baseline (T0), at three (T3w) and six weeks (T6w), post BoNT injection. The differences between sessions will be evaluated as measurements of effectiveness (Delta1 = T3w-T0; Delta2 = T6w - T0). To compare the effectiveness between groups, these delta values will be compared using a student's t-test or a Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Also, a Cohen's d will be calculated to determine the magnitude of these differences. In addition, the post-hoc power (1-β) will be measured. All statistical analyses will be performed in the STATA software (version 14.0 Stata-Corp LP, USA), considering a one tailed analysis, and a confidence level of 95%. Statistically significant differences will be considered those associated with a p-value lower than 0.05. We expect to find greater effectiveness in the group that receives the injection of BoNT, guided by the in vivo location of the IZ using HD-EMG.

02

Conditions studied

  • Muscle Spasticity
  • Stroke Sequelae
  • Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke
  • Gait Disorders, Neurologic

Keywords

  • Post-Stroke
  • Gait analysis
  • Botulinum toxin
  • High-density electromyography
03

In context

Muscle Spasticity

704 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Spasticity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 36 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Muscle Spasticity.

Browse Muscle Spasticity studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de los Andes, Chile is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Hemiplegia secondary to an ischemic of hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Focal spasticity of gastrocnemius muscles status 1-3 according to the modified Ashworth scale.
  • Independent gait ability with or without the use of technical assistance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spasticity status 4 according to the modified Ashworth scale.
  • Focal spasticity of the tibialis posterior and/or soleus.
  • Fracture and/or contracture in the lower extremities.
  • Other medical treatment for spasticity.
  • Allergy to the botulinum neurotoxin.
  • Suffering from some infectious disease
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Botulinum neurotoxin guided by ultrasonography and anatomical references

    Patients will be treated with a botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection into the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles of the paretic hemi-body. This injection will be guided by ultrasonography and anatomical references described in the EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM guideline.

    Combination Product: Botulinum toxin guided by ultrasonography and anatomical references

  • Experimental
    Botulinum neurotoxin guided by ultrasonography and in vivo location of innervation zone

    Patients will be treated with a botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection into the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles of the paretic hemi-body. However, in this case the injection will be guided by ultrasonography and the in vivo location of the innervation zones using noninvasive multielectrode electromyography.

    Combination Product: Botulinum neurotoxin guided by ultrasonography and in vivo location of innervation zones guided by high-density electromyography

Interventions

  • Combination productBotulinum toxin guided by ultrasonography and anatomical references

    The botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) will be calculated according to the weight of each patient. It will be injected in four places: two of them into the medial gastrocnemius and the other two into the lateral gastrocnemius. For medial gastrocnemius muscle, ¼ of the dose will be injected into the muscle belly at the 25% of the distance between the popliteal fossa and the intermalleolar line. Another ¼ will be injected into the muscle belly at the 35% of the previously mentioned distance. For lateral gastrocnemius, ¼ of the dose will be injected into the muscle belly at the 20% of the distance between the popliteal fossa and the intermalleolar line. The remaining ¼ of the dose will be injected into the muscle belly at the 30% of the previously described distance. All patients will conduct the same physical therapy program and under the direction of the same team of physical therapists. This program will begin two weeks after receiving the BoNT injection.

    Also known as: Botox injection

  • Combination productBotulinum neurotoxin guided by ultrasonography and in vivo location of innervation zones guided by high-density electromyography

    The botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) will be calculated according to the weight of each patient. It will be injected in eight places: four will be located in vivo for gastrocnemius medialis and four for gastrocnemius lateralis. These places will correspond to innervation zones located by high-density electromyography in different zones of each muscle. Thus, each of the eight located innervation zones will receive 1/8 of the calculated dose for the gastrocnemius muscle. All patients will conduct the same physical therapy program and under the direction of the same team of physical therapists. This program will begin two weeks after receiving the BoNT injection.

    Also known as: Botox injection, Linear electrode array electromyography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum ankle dorsiflexion during the stance phase in the paretic limb.

    Peak dorsiflexion angle during the stance phase in the paretic limb. This value will be calculated from Vicon Nexus 2.12 software, using the conventional gait model + functional calibration, and will be considered as the average value within 8 to 10 gait cycles.

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection

  2. Maximum ankle plantarflexion moment during the stance phase in the paretic limb

    Peak internal ankle dorsiflexion moment during the stance phase in the paretic limb. This value will be calculated from Vicon Nexus 2.12 software, using the conventional gait model + functional calibration, and will be considered as the average value within 8 to 10 gait cycles.

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection.

  3. Foot clearance in the paretic limb.

    Minimum distance between the lowest point on the shoe and the ground during the swing phase in the paretic limb. This value will be calculated from a custom-made biomechanical model, and will be considered as the average value within 8 to 10 gait cycles.

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Spasticity of plantar flexor muscles using the Ashworth modified scale.

    Qualitative evaluation of the increase in ankle plantar flexors tone during a muscle stretch movement (dorsiflexion). This will be scaled from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (ankle rigid during dorsiflexion movement).

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection.

  2. 6-minute walk distance.

    Measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes.

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection.

  3. Timed up and go time.

    Time to complete a standing from a chair with no arms, walking 5 meters and returning to sit down.

    Time frame: Before intervention (T0), three weeks (T3w) and six weeks (T6w) post botulinum neurotoxin injection.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Universidad de los Andes
    Santiago, Las Condes 7620001, Chile
  • Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Pedro Aguirre Cerda
    Santiago, Peñalolen 7910250, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grysiewicz RA, Thomas K, Pandey DK. Epidemiology of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: incidence, prevalence, mortality, and risk factors. Neurol Clin. 2008 Nov;26(4):871-95, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2008.07.003. PubMed 19026895 ↗
  • Lavados PM, Sacks C, Prina L, Escobar A, Tossi C, Araya F, Feuerhake W, Galvez M, Salinas R, Alvarez G. Incidence, 30-day case-fatality rate, and prognosis of stroke in Iquique, Chile: a 2-year community-based prospective study (PISCIS project). Lancet. 2005 Jun 25-Jul 1;365(9478):2206-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66779-7. PubMed 15978929 ↗
  • Watkins CL, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK. Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):515-22. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr512oa. PubMed 12194622 ↗
  • von Schroeder HP, Coutts RD, Lyden PD, Billings E Jr, Nickel VL. Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995 Feb;32(1):25-31. PubMed 7760264 ↗
  • Dashtipour K, Chen JJ, Walker HW, Lee MY. Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Lower Limb Spasticity. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2468. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002468. PubMed 26765447 ↗
  • Wei TS, Liu PT, Chang LW, Liu SY. Gait asymmetry, ankle spasticity, and depression as independent predictors of falls in ambulatory stroke patients. PLoS One. 2017 May 23;12(5):e0177136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177136. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28542281 ↗
  • Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology. 1980 Dec;30(12):1303-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.12.1303. No abstract available. PubMed 7192811 ↗
  • Schroder AS, Fietzek UM, Pavicic T, Stehr M, Baumann AC, Ruzicka T, Heinen F. [Botulinum toxin--the all-rounder in medicine]. MMW Fortschr Med. 2011 Jan 27;153(4):33-9; quiz 40. doi: 10.1007/BF03367697. No abstract available. German. PubMed 22165615 ↗
  • Woolley SM. Characteristics of gait in hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2001 Winter;7(4):1-18. doi: 10.1310/JB16-V04F-JAL5-H1UV. PubMed 14523755 ↗
  • Cofre Lizama LE, Khan F, Galea MP. Beyond speed: Gait changes after botulinum toxin injections in chronic stroke survivors (a systematic review). Gait Posture. 2019 May;70:389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Apr 4. PubMed 30974394 ↗
  • Karadag-Saygi E, Cubukcu-Aydoseli K, Kablan N, Ofluoglu D. The role of kinesiotaping combined with botulinum toxin to reduce plantar flexors spasticity after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):318-22. doi: 10.1310/tsr1704-318. PubMed 20826420 ↗
  • Hesse S, Krajnik J, Luecke D, Jahnke MT, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH. Ankle muscle activity before and after botulinum toxin therapy for lower limb extensor spasticity in chronic hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1996 Mar;27(3):455-60. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.3.455. PubMed 8610313 ↗
  • Pradon D, Hutin E, Khadir S, Taiar R, Genet F, Roche N. A pilot study to investigate the combined use of Botulinum toxin type-a and ankle foot orthosis for the treatment of spastic foot in chronic hemiplegic patients. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Oct;26(8):867-72. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 17. PubMed 21592635 ↗
  • Castelao M, Marques RE, Duarte GS, Rodrigues FB, Ferreira J, Sampaio C, Moore AP, Costa J. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 12;12(12):CD003633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003633.pub3. PubMed 29230798 ↗
  • Borodic G. Therapeutic botulinum toxin. Lancet. 1994 Nov 12;344(8933):1370. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90732-3. No abstract available. PubMed 7968058 ↗
  • Kaymak B, Kara M, Yagiz On A, Soylu AR, Ozcakar L. Innervation zone targeted botulinum toxin injections. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb;54(1):100-109. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04663-9. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28264545 ↗
  • Lapatki BG, van Dijk JP, van de Warrenburg BP, Zwarts MJ. Botulinum toxin has an increased effect when targeted toward the muscle's endplate zone: a high-density surface EMG guided study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;122(8):1611-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.11.018. Epub 2010 Dec 30. PubMed 21195024 ↗
  • Delnooz CC, Veugen LC, Pasman JW, Lapatki BG, van Dijk JP, van de Warrenburg BP. The clinical utility of botulinum toxin injections targeted at the motor endplate zone in cervical dystonia. Eur J Neurol. 2014 Dec;21(12):1486-e98. doi: 10.1111/ene.12517. Epub 2014 Jul 24. PubMed 25060697 ↗
  • Mirelman A, Shema S, Maidan I, Hausdorff JM. Gait. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:119-134. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00007-0. PubMed 30482309 ↗
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Norlin V. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(2):73-83. PubMed 1162302 ↗
  • Beyaert C, Vasa R, Frykberg GE. Gait post-stroke: Pathophysiology and rehabilitation strategies. Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Nov;45(4-5):335-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 4. PubMed 26547547 ↗
  • Mahendran N, Kuys SS, Brauer SG. Recovery of ambulation activity across the first six months post-stroke. Gait Posture. 2016 Sep;49:271-276. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.038. Epub 2016 Jun 29. PubMed 27474947 ↗
  • Winter DA. Overall principle of lower limb support during stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 1980;13(11):923-7. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90162-1. No abstract available. PubMed 7275999 ↗
  • Kaymak B, Kara M, Tok F, Ulasli AM, Ozturk GT, Chang KV, Hsiao MY, Hung CY, Yagiz On A, Ozcakar L. Sonographic guide for botulinum toxin injections of the lower limb: EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM spasticity approach. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):486-498. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04667-6. Epub 2017 Apr 4. PubMed 28382814 ↗
  • Akturk S, Buyukavci R, Ersoy Y. Functional outcomes following ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injections to reduce spastic equinovarus in adult post-stroke patients. Toxicon. 2018 May;146:95-98. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PubMed 29530514 ↗
  • Kwon JY, Hwang JH, Kim JS. Botulinum toxin a injection into calf muscles for treatment of spastic equinus in cerebral palsy: a controlled trial comparing sonography and electric stimulation-guided injection techniques: a preliminary report. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Apr;89(4):279-86. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ca24ac. PubMed 20068435 ↗
  • Park GY, Kwon DR. Sonoelastographic evaluation of medial gastrocnemius muscles intrinsic stiffness after rehabilitation therapy with botulinum toxin a injection in spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;93(11):2085-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.06.024. Epub 2012 Jul 7. PubMed 22776155 ↗
  • Picelli A, Bonetti P, Fontana C, Barausse M, Dambruoso F, Gajofatto F, Tamburin S, Girardi P, Gimigliano R, Smania N. Accuracy of botulinum toxin type A injection into the gastrocnemius muscle of adults with spastic equinus: manual needle placement and electrical stimulation guidance compared using ultrasonography. J Rehabil Med. 2012 May;44(5):450-2. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0970. PubMed 22549655 ↗
  • Picelli A, Tamburin S, Bonetti P, Fontana C, Barausse M, Dambruoso F, Gajofatto F, Santilli V, Smania N. Botulinum toxin type A injection into the gastrocnemius muscle for spastic equinus in adults with stroke: a randomized controlled trial comparing manual needle placement, electrical stimulation and ultrasonography-guided injection techniques. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;91(11):957-64. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d7f3. PubMed 23085706 ↗
  • Amatya B, Cofre Lizama LE, Elmalik A, Bastani A, Galea MP, Khan F. Multidimensional evaluation of changes in limb function following botulinum toxin injection in persons with stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;45(1):67-78. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192722. PubMed 31403954 ↗
  • Masuda T, Miyano H, Sadoyama T. The propagation of motor unit action potential and the location of neuromuscular junction investigated by surface electrode arrays. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 May;55(5):594-600. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90171-2. PubMed 6187554 ↗
  • Tokunaga T, Baba S, Tanaka M, Kashiwagi K, Kimura K, Kawazoe T. Two-dimensional configuration of the myoneural junctions of human masticatory muscle detected with matrix electrode. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 May;25(5):329-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00199.x. PubMed 9639155 ↗
  • Masuda T, Sadoyama T. Topographical map of innervation zones within single motor units measured with a grid surface electrode. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988 Aug;35(8):623-8. doi: 10.1109/10.4595. No abstract available. PubMed 3169813 ↗
  • Masuda T, Sadoyama T. Distribution of innervation zones in the human biceps brachii. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1991 Jun;1(2):107-15. doi: 10.1016/1050-6411(91)90004-O. PubMed 20870500 ↗
  • Saitou K, Masuda T, Michikami D, Kojima R, Okada M. Innervation zones of the upper and lower limb muscles estimated by using multichannel surface EMG. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 2000 Dec;29(1-2):35-52. PubMed 12696320 ↗
  • Van Campenhout A, Hubens G, Fagard K, Molenaers G. Localization of motor nerve branches of the human psoas muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2010 Aug;42(2):202-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.21660. PubMed 20544927 ↗
  • Yu DZ, Liu AT, Dang RS, Zhang CS, Zhang JL, Chen G, Yi J, Han T, Jiang H. Intramuscular innervations of muscle flaps that are commonly used in clinical settings. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010 Aug;32(7):637-46. doi: 10.1007/s00276-010-0644-2. Epub 2010 Mar 13. PubMed 20229172 ↗
  • Kwon JY, Kim JS, Lee WI. Anatomic localization of motor points of hip adductors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;88(4):336-41. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181619435. PubMed 18174845 ↗
  • Crystal R, Malone AA, Eastwood DM. Motor points for neuromuscular blockade of the adductor muscle group. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug;(437):196-200. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000165856.38166.9a. PubMed 16056049 ↗
  • Won SY, Rha DW, Kim HS, Jung SH, Park ES, Hu KS, Kim HJ. Intramuscular nerve distribution pattern of the adductor longus and gracilis muscles demonstrated with Sihler staining: guidance for botulinum toxin injection. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Jul;46(1):80-5. doi: 10.1002/mus.23273. Epub 2012 May 29. PubMed 22644785 ↗
  • Kumar VP, Liu J, Lau HK, Pereira BP, Shen Y, Pho RW. Neurovascular supply of the gracilis muscle: a study in the monkey and human. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jun;101(7):1854-60. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199806000-00012. PubMed 9623827 ↗
  • Paul AC. Muscle length affects the architecture and pattern of innervation differently in leg muscles of mouse, guinea pig, and rabbit compared to those of human and monkey muscles. Anat Rec. 2001 Mar 1;262(3):301-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0185(20010301)262:33.0.CO;2-H. PubMed 11241198 ↗
  • BUCHTHAL F, GULD C, ROSENFALCK P. Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. Acta Physiol Scand. 1954 Nov;32(2-3):200-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1954.tb01167.x. No abstract available. PubMed 13228109 ↗
  • BUCHTHAL F, GULD C, ROSENFALCK P. Innervation zone and propagation velocity in human muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1955 Dec 31;35(2):174-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1955.tb01276.x. No abstract available. PubMed 13301862 ↗
  • Buchthal F. Spontaneous electrical activity: an overview. Muscle Nerve. 1982;5(9S):S52-9. PubMed 6763149 ↗
  • Childers MK. The importance of electromyographic guidance and electrical stimulation for injection of botulinum toxin. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 Nov;14(4):781-92. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(03)00047-0. PubMed 14580037 ↗
  • Childers MK. Targeting the neuromuscular junction in skeletal muscles. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct;83(10 Suppl):S38-44. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000141129.23219.42. PubMed 15448576 ↗
  • Castroflorio T, Farina D, Bottin A, Debernardi C, Bracco P, Merletti R, Anastasi G, Bramanti P. Non-invasive assessment of motor unit anatomy in jaw-elevator muscles. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Oct;32(10):708-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01490.x. PubMed 16159347 ↗
  • Merletti R, Farina D, Gazzoni M. The linear electrode array: a useful tool with many applications. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003 Feb;13(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(02)00082-2. PubMed 12488085 ↗
  • Ullah K, Cescon C, Afsharipour B, Merletti R. Automatic detection of motor unit innervation zones of the external anal sphincter by multichannel surface EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Dec;24(6):860-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 24. PubMed 24948528 ↗
  • Guzman-Venegas RA, Bralic MP, Cordero JJ, Cavada G, Araneda OF. Concordance of the location of the innervation zone of the tibialis anterior muscle using voluntary and imposed contractions by electrostimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Apr;27:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 29. PubMed 26874077 ↗
  • Kara M, Kaymak B, Ulasli AM, Tok F, Ozturk GT, Chang KV, Hsiao MY, Hung CY, Yagiz On A, Ozcakar L. Sonographic guide for botulinum toxin injections of the upper limb: EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM spasticity approach. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Jun;54(3):469-485. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04664-0. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28264546 ↗
  • Lim EC, Seet RC. Botulinum toxin: description of injection techniques and examination of controversies surrounding toxin diffusion. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008 Feb;117(2):73-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00931.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11. PubMed 17850405 ↗
  • Lee JH, Han SH, Ye JF, Lee BN, An X, Kwon SO. Effective zone of botulinum toxin a injections in hallux claw toe syndrome: an anatomical study. Muscle Nerve. 2012 Feb;45(2):217-21. doi: 10.1002/mus.22263. PubMed 22246877 ↗
  • Lee DR, You JH, Yi CH, Jeon HS. Motor point location index using regression equations for the tibialis anterior muscle. NeuroRehabilitation. 2012;30(4):307-13. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2012-0760. PubMed 22672945 ↗
  • Guzman-Venegas RA, Araneda OF, Silvestre RA. Differences between motor point and innervation zone locations in the biceps brachii. An exploratory consideration for the treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2014 Dec;24(6):923-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Aug 2. PubMed 25138645 ↗
  • Nishizono H, Saito Y, Miyashita M. The estimation of conduction velocity in human skeletal muscle in situ with surface electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1979 Jun;46(6):659-64. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90103-2. PubMed 87310 ↗
  • Grigoriu AI, Dinomais M, Remy-Neris O, Brochard S. Impact of Injection-Guiding Techniques on the Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Focal Spasticity and Dystonia: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Nov;96(11):2067-78.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 14. PubMed 25982240 ↗
  • Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, Carles-Hernandez R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13. PubMed 28901119 ↗
  • Clague-Baker N, Robinson T, Hagenberg A, Drewry S, Gillies C, Singh S. The validity and reliability of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test and Six-minute Walk Test compared to an Incremental Cycle Test for people who have had a mild-to-moderate stroke. Physiotherapy. 2019 Jun;105(2):275-282. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 21. PubMed 30954276 ↗
  • Geiger M, Bonnyaud C, Bussel B, Roche N. Assessing of imagined and real expanded Timed Up and Go tests in patients with chronic stroke: A case-control study. J Rehabil Med. 2018 May 8;50(5):413-419. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2315. PubMed 29487942 ↗
  • Comella CL, Buchman AS, Tanner CM, Brown-Toms NC, Goetz CG. Botulinum toxin injection for spasmodic torticollis: increased magnitude of benefit with electromyographic assistance. Neurology. 1992 Apr;42(4):878-82. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.4.878. PubMed 1565246 ↗
  • Kaishou Xu, Tiebin Yan, Jianning Mai. A randomized controlled trial to compare two botulinum toxin injection techniques on the functional improvement of the leg of children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Sep;23(9):800-11. doi: 10.1177/0269215509335295. Epub 2009 May 29. PubMed 19482892 ↗
  • Jordan SE, Ahn SS, Gelabert HA. Combining ultrasonography and electromyography for botulinum chemodenervation treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome: comparison with fluoroscopy and electromyography guidance. Pain Physician. 2007 Jul;10(4):541-6. PubMed 17660852 ↗
  • Gracies JM, Lugassy M, Weisz DJ, Vecchio M, Flanagan S, Simpson DM. Botulinum toxin dilution and endplate targeting in spasticity: a double-blind controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):9-16.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.030. PubMed 19154823 ↗
  • Kaymak B, Kara M, Gurcay E, Ozcakar L. Sonographic Guide for Botulinum Toxin Injections of the Neck Muscles in Cervical Dystonia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018 Feb;29(1):105-123. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2017.08.009. PubMed 29173657 ↗
  • Rohrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Blettner M. Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Apr;106(15):262-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0262. Epub 2009 Apr 10. PubMed 19547627 ↗
  • Paterson KL, Hinman RS, Metcalf BR, Bennell KL, Wrigley TV. Plug-in-Gait calculation of the knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis during shod walking: comparison of two different foot marker models. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 Feb 4;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0187-4. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28174605 ↗
  • Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68. PubMed 2720055 ↗
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. PubMed 2868172 ↗
  • Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1. No abstract available. PubMed 23997866 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Study protocol and statistical analysis plan will be published. Statistical analysis plan includes all databases used in the study. These databases will not include personal information of patients.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07124806
Lead sponsor
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Collaborators
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Pedro Aguirre Cerda
Responsible party
RODRIGO AANTONIO GUZMAN (PT, PhD, Universidad de los Andes, Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 29, 2022
Completion
Dec 4, 2022
Last update
Aug 15, 2025

Study contacts

Rodrigo A Guzmán-Venegas, PhD
study director · Universidad de los Andes, Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion