CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07113782Updated Aug 11, 2025

Comparison of Magnesium Sulphate vs Tramadol as Adjuvants in Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain in TURP Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of 1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to male participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether adding magnesium sulfate or tramadol to intrathecal bupivacaine improves postoperative pain control and hemodynamic stability in adult male patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does the addition of magnesium sulfate or tramadol prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia compared to bupivacaine alone?

Does either adjuvant provide better intraoperative hemodynamic stability?

Researchers will compare two groups:

One group receiving magnesium sulfate plus bupivacaine

Another group receiving tramadol plus bupivacaine

to see which combination is more effective for pain control and hemodynamic outcomes.

Participants will:

Receive spinal anesthesia with either magnesium sulfate or tramadol added to bupivacaine.

Be monitored during surgery for heart rate, blood pressure, and other vital signs.

Be assessed after surgery for pain levels and time until first request for additional pain medication.

Read the detailed description

This retrospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate and tramadol as intrathecal adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine in male patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under spinal anesthesia.

The primary aim was to evaluate:

The duration of postoperative analgesia, defined as the time from the completion of surgery to the patient's first request for rescue analgesia.

Intraoperative hemodynamic stability, assessed by monitoring mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and the incidence of hypotension or bradycardia.

A total of 60 adult male patients, aged 50 to 80 years, undergoing elective TURP were randomly allocated into two groups (30 patients each):

Group M (Magnesium Group): Received 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50 mg of magnesium sulfate intrathecally.

Group T (Tramadol Group): Received 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 20 mg of tramadol intrathecally.

All patients received spinal anesthesia at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace under aseptic conditions. Intraoperative monitoring included ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry. Data on hemodynamic parameters were collected at regular intervals throughout the procedure.

Primary Outcome Measures:

Time to first postoperative analgesic request (in minutes)

Mean arterial pressure and heart rate during the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures:

Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block

Incidence of adverse events including hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression

Blinding was maintained for both patients and the investigator recording postoperative outcomes.

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Armed Forces Institute of Urology (AFIU), Rawalpindi. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to inclusion in the study.

This trial was completed before registration and is being submitted retrospectively for transparency and publication compliance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Magnesium sulphate
  • Tramadol
  • Intrathecal anesthesia
  • Bupivacaine
  • TURP
  • Postoperative pain
  • Hemodynamic stability
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male patients aged 50 to 80 years
  • Scheduled for elective transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine, tramadol, or magnesium sulfate
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection at the injection site)
  • History of chronic opioid use or substance abuse
  • Severe hepatic, renal, or cardiac disease
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders affecting pain perception or reporting
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental - Group M (Magnesium Sulphate)

    Patients receive 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 50 mg (0.1 mL) magnesium sulphate intrathecally. Intervention Name: Magnesium sulphate

    Drug: 1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator - Group T (Tramadol)

    Patients receive 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mg (0.5 mL) tramadol intrathecally. Intervention Name: Tramadol

    Drug: 1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol

Interventions

  • Drug1. Magnesium Sulphate 2. Tramadol

    Magnesium Sulphate (Group M): 50 mg magnesium sulphate added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally. Tramadol (Group T): 25 mg tramadol added to 12.5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, administered intrathecally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of postoperative analgesia

    Time (in minutes) from administration of intrathecal drug to the first request for rescue analgesia (VAS ≥ 4).

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • AFIU
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province 52250, Pakistan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07113782
Lead sponsor
Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi
Responsible party
Jawad Ul Hassan (Anaesthesiologist, Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion