CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07112807Updated Aug 8, 2025

Comparison of the Effects of ShoulderSphere Exercises and Bodyblade Exercises

An interventional study of Strengthening Exercises and ShoulderSphere Exercises and Resistive Exercises in Scapular Dyskinesis, sponsored by Gazi University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 25 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by Gazi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2024, registered Aug 2025).
  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The scapula functions as a bridge connecting the upper extremity and the trunk. It contributes to more efficient and functional upper extremity movements. Scapular dyskinesis, defined as a deviation from the resting position and movements of the scapula, can reduce shoulder proprioception, scapular muscle endurance, and upper extremity function. The aim is to compare the long-term effects of exercises performed using the ShoulderSphere and the Bodyblade, which provide oscillatory stimulation and vibration, enhancing neuromuscular control that improves these factors. Forty-five volunteers with asymptomatic scapular dyskinesis will be randomized into three groups. The control group will receive resistive scapular muscle exercises. The ShoulderSphere group will receive exercises performed using the ShoulderSphere in addition to the control group. The Bodyblade group will receive exercises performed using the Bodyblade in addition to the control group. Pre- and post-treatment proprioception, muscle endurance, and upper extremity function will be assessed, and the groups will be compared. The study results will analyze which method is more effective in the rehabilitation program of individuals with asymptomatic scapular dyskinesis and determine its inclusion in the rehabilitation program.

Read the detailed description

The scapula functions as a critical biomechanical and neuromuscular bridge between the upper extremity and the trunk, playing a key role in shoulder stability and movement efficiency. Proper scapular motion and positioning are essential for optimal upper limb function. Scapular dyskinesis, defined as an alteration in the resting position or dynamic movement of the scapula, is associated with impaired proprioception, decreased endurance of scapular stabilizer muscles, and reduced functional capacity of the upper extremity. Even in asymptomatic individuals, scapular dyskinesis may predispose to future shoulder pathologies if left unaddressed.

In recent years, rehabilitation strategies have increasingly focused on enhancing neuromuscular control and sensorimotor integration through tools that provide oscillatory and vibratory stimuli. Two such tools-ShoulderSphere and Bodyblade-have gained attention for their ability to activate deep stabilizing musculature and improve dynamic scapular control. These devices generate multidirectional resistance and stimulate rapid afferent feedback mechanisms, promoting more efficient and coordinated muscle responses.

In this study, investigating the long-term effects of ShoulderSphere and Bodyblade training in individuals with asymptomatic scapular dyskinesis may provide valuable insight into their therapeutic potential. The study will involve 45 volunteers who will be randomly assigned to three groups. The control group will perform traditional resistive exercises targeting scapular stabilizers. The ShoulderSphere group will receive the same exercise program with the addition of ShoulderSphere-based training. Similarly, the Bodyblade group will perform the standard exercises along with Bodyblade training. Through this comparison, the study aims to determine which intervention offers greater benefits in improving scapular control, proprioception, and upper extremity function over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scapular Dyskinesis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gazi University is the lead sponsor of 531 studies on the registry; 99 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Having scapular dyskinesia
  • No shoulder or neck pain

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive Neer, Jobe, or Hawkins tests
  • Shoulder instability
  • Painful arch during arm elevation
  • Painful passive or resisted shoulder external rotation at 90° shoulder abduction
  • History of shoulder fracture or surgery
  • Presence of shoulder pain in the last 6 months
  • Presence of cognitive or neurological impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control

    Individuals assigned to the control group will be administered resistive exercises targeting the middle and lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles. The program will progress by increasing the number of exercises and the amount of resistance.

    Other: Strengthening Exercises

  • Experimental
    ShoulderSphere

    In addition to the exercises in the control group, exercises will be performed using the ShoulderSphere in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes.

    Other: Strengthening Exercises · Other: ShoulderSphere Exercises and Resistive Exercises

  • Experimental
    Bodyblade

    In addition to the exercises performed in the control group, 15 minutes of exercises using the Bodyblade will be performed. Individuals will perform oscillation exercises in the frontal, sagittal, and transverse planes.

    Other: Strengthening Exercises · Other: Bodyblade Exercises and Resistive Exercises

Interventions

  • OtherStrengthening Exercises

    Strengthening exercises targeting the middle and lower trapezius and serratus anterior muscles will be performed. The program will progress by increasing the number of exercises and the amount of resistance.

  • OtherShoulderSphere Exercises and Resistive Exercises

    In addition to strengthening exercises, exercises will be performed using the ShoulderSphere in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes with the shoulders in 90° flexion and the elbows in extension.

  • OtherBodyblade Exercises and Resistive Exercises

    In addition to strengthening exercises, 15 minutes of exercises using the Bodyblade will be performed. Individuals will perform oscillation exercises in the frontal, sagittal, and transverse planes while holding the Bodyblade bar firmly with their shoulders in 90° flexion and elbows in extension.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proprioception

    Shoulder joint proprioception will be assessed with a digital inclinometer in flexion, abduction, and external rotation.

    Time frame: Before and after 4 weeks intervention

  2. Scapular Muscle Endurance

    Serratus anterior and trapezius muscle endurance will be assessed using a dynamometer.

    Time frame: Before and after 4 weeks intervention

  3. Upper Extremity Function

    The Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test will be used.

    Time frame: Before and after 4 weeks intervention

  4. Lateral scapular slide test

    This test will be evaluated to detect scapular dyskinesis.

    Time frame: Before treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Gazi University
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Tuğçe Çoban, MSc · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kibler WB, Sciascia A. Current concepts: scapular dyskinesis. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;44(5):300-5. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058834. Epub 2009 Dec 8. PubMed 19996329 ↗
  • Cho J, Lee K, Kim M, Hahn J, Lee W. The Effects of Double Oscillation Exercise Combined with Elastic Band Exercise on Scapular Stabilizing Muscle Strength and Thickness in Healthy Young Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):7-16. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 29535573 ↗
  • Lister JL, Del Rossi G, Ma F, Stoutenberg M, Adams JB, Tobkin S, Signorile JF. Scapular stabilizer activity during Bodyblade, cuff weights, and Thera-Band use. J Sport Rehabil. 2007 Feb;16(1):50-67. doi: 10.1123/jsr.16.1.50. PubMed 17699887 ↗
  • Savitzky JA, Abrams LR, Galluzzo NA, Ostrow SP, Protosow TJ, Liu SA, Handrakis JP, Friel K. Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function. J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Dec 1;35(12):3355-3363. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003347. PubMed 35133996 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07112807
Lead sponsor
Gazi University
Responsible party
Tuğçe Çoban (Research Assistant, Gazi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
Start date
Oct 21, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 29, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 12, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Study contacts

Tuğçe Çoban, MSc
Contact
fzttugce@yahoo.com
5454098540
Tuğçe Çoban, MSc
study director · Gazi University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion