ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07112430FIREFLYUpdated Jun 30, 2026

Fentanyl Intranasal for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening in Preterm Infants

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Fentanyl Citrate (Intranasal) and Normal Saline (Placebo, Intranasal) in Neonatal Pain, Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and Pain Management, sponsored by Marsha Campbell-Yeo. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-30.

Sponsored by Marsha Campbell-Yeo · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether intranasal fentanyl (a pain medicine given as a nasal spray) can reduce pain and is safe to use during routine eye examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants. ROP is an eye condition that can affect babies born too early and requires regular eye examinations. The main questions this study aims to answer are: Does intranasal fentanyl lower pain during ROP screening? Is intranasal fentanyl safe for preterm infants? Researchers will compare intranasal fentanyl with a placebo (a saltwater spray that contains no medicine) to determine whether the medicine lowers pain during ROP screening.

Participants will receive either intranasal fentanyl or placebo before their routine ROP eye examination, in addition to the standard comfort measures normally used during the procedure. Researchers will measure participants' pain and monitor their heart rate, oxygen levels, and any side effects during and after the examination.

Read the detailed description

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening is an essential part of the care of preterm infants. Despite the routine use of standard comfort measures, the examination remains associated with moderate-to-high pain intensity scores in many infants. Repeated exposure to untreated or undertreated procedural pain in preterm infants has been associated with adverse short- and long-term effects, highlighting the need for additional evidence-based pain management strategies.

Intranasal fentanyl has several characteristics that make it a promising option for procedural pain management. It has a rapid onset of action, is easy to administer, avoids the need for intravenous access, and has been shown to be effective and well tolerated for procedural pain in older infants and children. Emerging neonatal evidence, including randomized controlled trials, suggests that intranasal fentanyl may reduce pain during ROP screening, but additional high-quality evidence is needed to establish its effectiveness and safety in preterm infants.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will evaluate whether intranasal fentanyl, when used in addition to standard comfort measures, reduces pain during routine ROP screening while maintaining an acceptable safety profile. The study is designed to provide high-quality evidence to help determine whether intranasal fentanyl should be considered as an additional option for pain management during this necessary neonatal procedure.

The findings from this study may help improve pain management for preterm infants undergoing ROP screening and contribute to future evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for neonatal procedural pain management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Pain
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
  • Pain Management
  • Infant, Premature
  • Fentanyl
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Neonatal Intensive Care Units
  • Analgesia
  • Intranasal Drug Administration

Keywords

  • intranasal fentanyl
  • fentanyl
  • neonatal analgesia
  • procedural pain
  • ROP screening
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
  • Preterm infants
  • Premature infants
  • infant pain
  • Non-invasive analgesia
  • Opioid analgesia
  • Intranasal drug delivery
  • Neonatal intensive care
  • NICU
  • Pain management in neonates
  • Infant procedural sedation
03

In context

Retinopathy of Prematurity

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 58 is below the median of 82 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Browse Retinopathy of Prematurity studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Marsha Campbell-Yeo as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born ≤31 weeks gestational age and/or with birth weight \<1250 g
  • Scheduled to undergo routine retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening as part of standard NICU care
  • Clinically stable at the time of screening, defined as not requiring acute resuscitative support (no bag-mask ventilation, intubation, or chest compressions within the preceding 24 hours) and maintaining stable cardiorespiratory parameters on baseline respiratory support
  • Written obtained from a parent or legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Congenital anomalies or conditions affecting the nasal passages that would interfere with intranasal drug administration
  • Receipt of systemic opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, or other sedative/analgesic medications within 24 hours prior to the ROP examination
  • Known or prior adverse reaction to fentanyl
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal Fentanyl Group

    Participants in this group will receive intranasal fentanyl at a dose of 2 mcg/kg administered 10 minutes prior to initiation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. The study drug will be delivered via a mucosal atomization device into one nostril. All participants will also receive standard comfort measures as part of routine NICU care, including oral sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, and topical anesthetic eye drops.

    Drug: Fentanyl Citrate (Intranasal)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Group

    Participants in this group will receive an equivalent volume of intranasal 0.9% normal saline placebo administered 10 minutes prior to initiation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening using a mucosal atomization device. All participants will also receive standard comfort measures as part of routine NICU care, including oral sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, and topical anesthetic eye drops.

    Drug: Normal Saline (Placebo, Intranasal)

Interventions

  • Fentanyl citrate will be administered intranasally at a dose of 2 mcg/kg via a mucosal atomization device 10 minutes prior to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. The intervention will be delivered into one nostril. All participants will also receive standard comfort measures as part of routine NICU care, including oral sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, and topical anesthetic eye drops.

  • DrugNormal Saline (Placebo, Intranasal)

    An equivalent volume of intranasal 0.9% normal saline placebo will be administered via a mucosal atomization device 10 minutes prior to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening. All participants will also receive standard comfort measures as part of routine NICU care, including oral sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, swaddling, and topical anesthetic eye drops.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity during ROP screening

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). The primary endpoint is the PIPP-R score during the first 30 seconds following speculum insertion during the ROP examination.

    Time frame: First 30 seconds after speculum insertion during ROP screening

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of infants with low to mild pain

    The proportion of infants experiencing low or mild pain will be determined using PIPP-R score thresholds (≤6), assessed by blinded coders from synchronized video recordings during and following the ROP examination.

    Time frame: During procedure and at 1- and 5-minutes post-procedure

  2. Ongoing pain response during ROP screening

    Pain response will be assessed using PIPP-R scores measured at 30-second intervals from speculum insertion until completion of the ROP examination, coded from synchronized video by blinded assessors.

    Time frame: Every 30 seconds during the procedure

  3. Pain recovery following ROP screening

    Pain recovery will be evaluated using PIPP-R scores measured at 1 and 5 minutes following completion of the ROP examination to assess resolution of pain.

    Time frame: 1-minute and 5-minutes post-procedure

  4. Cry duration

    Total cry duration (in seconds) will be measured from synchronized video recordings during the ROP examination and recovery period by trained, blinded assessors.

    Time frame: From speculum insertion through 5 minutes post-procedure

  5. Salivary cortisol response

    Salivary cortisol will be measured as a biologic marker of stress response, collected at baseline (20 minutes pre-procedure) and 20 minutes post-procedure to assess change from baseline.

    Time frame: 20 minutes pre-procedure and 20 minutes post-procedure

  6. Adverse events

    Safety will be evaluated by monitoring predefined adverse events including apnea, bradycardia, hypotension, chest wall rigidity, oxygen desaturation, and requirement for airway support following intranasal administration.

    Time frame: During the procedure and up to 4 hours post-intervention

  7. Duration of ROP examination

    Total duration of the ROP examination will be measured in seconds from speculum insertion to removal using timestamped video recordings.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  8. Physiological responses

    Physiological parameters including heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure will be recorded as indicators of physiological response to the procedure, using synchronized bedside monitoring data.

    Time frame: Baseline, during the procedure, and at 1- and 5-minutes post-procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McCord H, Disher T, Promelle V, Mitra S, Singh B, Bruce C, Peckham C, Neil E, Campbell-Yeo M. Intranasal fentanyl to reduce pain intensity associated with retinopathy of prematurity screening in preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2026 Jul 15. doi: 10.1186/s12887-026-07328-x. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42458331 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The plan to share individual participant data (IPD) is currently undecided. IPD sharing may be considered in the future depending on institutional policies, ethics approval, and participant consent. If data sharing is pursued, it will involve de-identified data underlying published results, and appropriate data use agreements and secure access mechanisms will be established. No final decision has been made at this stage.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Mar 2028, 17 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 29, 2025
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
StartEst.
Sep 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2028
Last update
Jun 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07112430
Lead sponsor
Marsha Campbell-Yeo
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre
Responsible party
Marsha Campbell-Yeo (Clinician Scientist, Neonatal Nurse Practitioner, Professor, IWK Health Centre) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
Start date
Sep 9, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 30, 2026

Study contacts

Helen McCord, BScN, MN, PhD Candidate, NNP
Contact
mccordhelen@hotmail.com
19024971412

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fentanyl

Start the discussion