CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07105878Updated Apr 24, 2026

Epidural Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Epidural Electrical Stimulation and Standard Rehabilitation Therapy in Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2025, registered Jul 2025).
  • Started Mar 2025; still recruiting 1 year 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) in motor and sensory function Reconstruction in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients classified as ASIA B-D. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does EES treatment significantly improve motor and sensory function in patients with SCI compared to baseline? Is EES a safe intervention for this patient population? Researchers will compare participants' motor function, sensory function, and quality of life assessments before EES implantation, immediately after activation of the device, and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-implantation to evaluate the longitudinal effects of EES.

Participants will:

Undergo surgical implantation of an EES device in the epidural space. Have the EES device activated and receive personalized stimulation parameter adjustments during follow-up visits.

Complete regular motor and sensory function assessments using standardized protocols.

Participate in structured rehabilitation training sessions while using the EES device.

Report any adverse events and complete quality of life questionnaires at specified follow-up intervals.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)

Keywords

  • Epidural Electrical Stimulation
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Sensor function reconstruction
  • Motor function reconstruction
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 1,058 studies on the registry; 511 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Spinal Cord Injury, ASIA B-D;
  • Spinal cord injury level above T10;
  • Diagnosed with spinal cord injury for ≥ 8 months and ≤ 36 months;
  • WISCI II score \< 13;
  • No significant improvement in motor dysfunction after rehabitation over the past 2 months.
  • An expected survival period of ≥ 12 months.
  • Subjects voluntarily participate in this study, sign the informed consent form, have good compliance, cooperate with necessary postoperative rehabilitation training and tests, and assist in follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with other severe organic neurological diseases, mental illnesses other than anxiety/depression.
  • Subjects with hemorrhagic diathesis or coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin time [PT] ≥ 18 seconds).
  • Subjects with a history of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.
  • Subjects with mental retardation, cognitive dysfunction, or personality disorders.
  • Subjects with a history of electroconvulsive therapy or those requiring continuous electrotherapy.
  • Subjects with implanted cardiac pacemakers, cardioverters, or defibrillators. Expected survival period \< 1 year.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) + Standard Rehabilitation

    Participants receive the EES intervention combined with standard rehabilitation therapy (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy) for 6 months.

    Procedure: Epidural Electrical Stimulation · Procedure: Standard Rehabilitation Therapy · Radiation: positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) · Radiation: Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) · Procedure: Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEPs) · Procedure: Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)

Interventions

  • ProcedureEpidural Electrical Stimulation

    Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) is a medical technology that involves delivering controlled electrical impulses to the spinal cord through electrodes implanted in the epidural space-the area between the outermost membrane of the spinal cord (dura mater) and the vertebrae. This technique aims to modulate the activity of spinal neural networks, thereby regulating neurological functions and promoting functional recovery, particularly in individuals with spinal cord injuries or certain neurological disorders.

  • ProcedureStandard Rehabilitation Therapy

    A structured, multidisciplinary rehabilitation program designed to improve motor function, mobility, and independence in participants with paralysis. The therapy typically includes physical Therapy and occupational Therapy.

  • Radiationpositron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)

    PET-CT is an advanced hybrid imaging modality that combines metabolic information from positron emission tomography with anatomical details from computed tomography.

  • RadiationDiffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)

    DTI is an advanced MRI technique that maps white matter tracts by measuring the directionality (anisotropy) and magnitude of water molecule diffusion in neural tissues. It provides quantitative metrics of fibers.

  • ProcedureSomatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEPs)

    SEPs are electrophysiological responses recorded from the central or peripheral nervous system following electrical stimulation of sensory nerves. They assess the functional integrity of somatosensory pathways.

  • ProcedureMotor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)

    MEPs are electrophysiological responses elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation or electrical stimulation of the motor cortex, recorded from peripheral muscles or the spinal cord. They evaluate the integrity of corticospinal tracts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. WISCI II (Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II)

    The WISCI II evaluates walking ability in spinal cord injury patients. It has 21 levels (0-20), with scores based on mobility aids, assistance needed, and walking distance. A score of 0 means no walking; 20 indicates independent walking over 500 meters without aids. It tracks recovery progress and helps tailor rehabilitation plans for locomotor function.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

  2. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a widely used assessment tool designed to evaluate a person's functional status and level of independence in daily living activities, particularly among individuals with disabilities. FIM items are scored based on the level of assistance required to complete a task, ranging from 1 to 7 points per item. The FIM consists of 18 items across two domains: Motor domain (13 items): Includes activities such as eating, grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers (bed/chair, toilet, tub/shower), walking, and stair climbing. Cognitive domain (5 items): Covers communication (comprehension and expression) and social cognition (memory, problem-solving, and social interaction). The total score ranges from 18 to 126 points: ≤ 35 points: Severe dependence 36-89 points: Moderate dependence 90-119 points: Mild dependence 120-126 points: Functional independence

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)

    ISNCSCI is the most authoritative and widely used standard for evaluating neurological function after spinal cord injury, comprising: Motor Scores: Range: Upper limbs (C5-T1): 0-25 per limb (total 0-50) Lower limbs (L2-S1): 0-25 per limb (total 0-50) Total motor score: 0-100 points Higher scores indicate better motor function Sensory Scores: Light touch: 0-2 points per dermatome (C2-S4/5) Total: 0-112 points Pinprick: 0-2 points per dermatome (C2-S4/5) Total: 0-112 points Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better sensory preservation Neurological Level of Injury Determined by the most caudal segment with: ≥3/5 muscle strength (motor level) Intact sensation (sensory level) ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) Grading: A = Complete (no motor/sensory function in S4-S5) B = Sensory incomplete C = Motor incomplete (\<50% key muscles ≥3/5 below NLI) D = Motor incomplete (≥50% key muscles ≥3/5 below NLI) E = Normal

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

  2. Modified Ashworth Scale

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a clinical tool used to assess muscle spasticity by grading resistance during passive movement. It scores from 0 (no tone increase) to 4 (rigid joint), with intermediate grades: 1 (slight resistance), 1+ (mild resistance through ≤50% ROM), 2 (marked resistance), and 3 (considerable resistance). Higher MAS scores (max=4) indicate worse outcomes, reflecting more severe spasticity that impairs mobility. The assessment requires standardized passive stretching at 1 joint/sec. While widely used, it shows limitations in distinguishing mild/moderate spasticity reliably.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

  3. Penn

    The Penn Scale is a specific assessment tool for measuring muscle spasticity. Scores range from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (severe, rigid spasticity), with higher scores indicating more intense muscle stiffness and involuntary contractions.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 months after surgery

  4. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)

    The HAMD is a clinician-administered assessment used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals. It typically consists of 17 items, with scores based on the patient's reported feelings, behavior, and psychological state over the past week. A higher score indicates more severe depression. It is widely used to diagnose depression, evaluate treatment efficacy, and monitor symptom changes over time.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

  5. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)

    The HAMA is a clinician-rated scale designed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptoms. It comprises 14 items, with scores reflecting both psychic anxiety (mental agitation) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints). A higher score signifies a greater level of anxiety. It assists in diagnosing anxiety disorders, assessing their intensity, and tracking the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

  6. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS Pain Score is a self-reported measure of pain intensity. It consists of a 10-cm horizontal line, anchored by "no pain" (0) on one end and "worst pain imaginable" (10) on the other. Patients mark the line to represent their current pain level, and the score is determined by measuring the distance from "no pain." It provides a simple, quick method to quantify subjective pain experiences, monitor fluctuations, and guide pain management strategies.

    Time frame: baseline, and 1, 3, 6 monthes after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310009, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07105878
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Junming Zhu (Chief Physician, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 6, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Study contacts

Junming Zhu, Chief Physician
Contact
dr.zhujunming@zju.edu.cn
13968055768
Zhoule Zhu, Attending Physician
Contact
doczhuzl@zju.edu.cn
15168377035
Junming Zhu, Chief Physician
principal investigator · Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion