ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07094451Updated Aug 27, 2026

Virtual Reality for Pain Control in US-Guided Obstetric Needle Procedures

An interventional study of Virtual Reality and Ultrasound in Procedural Pain, sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This is a single-site randomized controlled pilot study at Mount Sinai Hospital evaluating the effect of virtual reality on procedural pain and anxiety in obstetric patients undergoing ultrasound-guided needle procedures. Patients will be randomized to receive either VR or standard care during the procedure and complete validated questionnaires assessing pain, anxiety, intervention acceptability, and satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Procedural Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Virtual reality
  • Procedural anxiety
  • Ultrasound-guided
  • Obstetric patients
  • Non-pharmacologic pain control
  • Immersive distraction
03

In context

Pain, Procedural

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is the lead sponsor of 776 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 83 (66%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18
  • English-speaking
  • Undergoing ultrasound-guided needle procedure at Mount Sinai

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • History of seizures
  • Severe motion sickness
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Patients without Virtual Reality (VR)

    Standard of care procedure without virtual reality.

    Procedure: Ultrasound

  • Experimental
    Patients with Virtual Reality

    Ultrasound-guided (US-Guided) procedure with virtual reality. Participants will wear a Meta Quest 2 virtual reality headset during their ultrasound-guided needle procedure.

    Device: Virtual Reality · Procedure: Ultrasound

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality

    Meta Quest 2 virtual reality headset. The VR experience includes an interactive, immersive environment with classical music and wrist-controlled movement to match floating visual cues to a beat. The experience is designed to be soothing and require minimal movement.

  • ProcedureUltrasound

    Ultrasound-guided (US-Guided) procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire

    The Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is used to assess procedural pain and its qualities, such as 'sharpness.' The total score ranges from 0 to 45, with higher scores indicating more pain. It includes subscales for Sensory (0-33), Affective (0-12), a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10), and Present Pain Intensity (0-5).

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

    This is a short, 4-question survey that helps the research team understand how acceptable participants found the use of virtual reality (VR) during their procedure. Participants rate each statement (ex: "The VR intervention meets my approval") on a scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The total score ranges from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the VR experience.

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure (procedure lasts approximately 20 minutes)

  2. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    The STAI is a 20-item instrument assessing anxiety before and after procedure. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 1-4. Total scale range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating higher state anxiety.

    Time frame: Immediately Pre-procedure and immediately post-procedure (procedure lasts approximately 20 minutes)

  3. Visual Analog Scale for Satisfaction

    This is a simple one-question survey where participants rate how satisfied they were with their overall procedure experience. They will mark their satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 means "not satisfied at all" and 10 means "completely satisfied." The total score ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Immediately post-procedure (procedure lasts approximately 20 minutes)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Mount Sinai Obstetrics and Gynecology
    New York, New York 10029, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is a single-site, small-scale pilot study that does not include the collection of biospecimens or long-term follow-up data. The data collected are limited to de-identified questionnaire responses.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 21 months after the start.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 21 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 23, 2025
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
StartActual
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 6, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 6, 2027
Last update
Aug 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07094451
Responsible party
Daniel Katz (Professor and Vice Chair of Education for the Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, & Perioperative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2025
Start date
Jul 2, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 6, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 6, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Study contacts

Lucy Shang, BA
Contact
lucy.shang@icahn.mssm.edu
212-241-7475
Daniel Katz, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion