ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07084623Updated Jul 24, 2025

Comparison of Pre-procedure Lignocaine Spray Versus Spray-as-you-go for Topical Airway Anesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy

An interventional study of Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) and Lignocaine Spray (Spray-as-you-go) in Lignocaine, Anesthesia, Local and Trachea, sponsored by Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 72 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2021, registered Jun 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 72 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Title: Comparing Two Methods of Topical Anesthesia for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of two methods of anesthesia, pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) and spray-as-you-go (SAYG), in reducing discomfort and improving operator comfort during fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Participants: 50 patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy Interventions: Patients received either PPL or SAYG anesthesia

Outcomes:

  • Pain perception
  • Cough severity
  • Operator comfort
  • Procedure duration

Results:

  • Both PPL and SAYG methods were effective in reducing pain and discomfort
  • No significant differences were observed between the two groups in pain perception, cough scores, or procedure duration
  • Operator comfort scores showed a trend favoring PPL, but the difference was not statistically significant

Implications: Both PPL and SAYG methods can be effectively used for fiberoptic bronchoscopy, with potential implications for procedural efficiency and patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

A single-blind RCT included 50 participants were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 25 each). Standard procedural sedation with midazolam and 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx was used to suppress the gag reflex. Additionally, 2% lignocaine spray was administered during the procedure according to body weight (3 mg/kg) via oral scope insertion. Cough severity, pain perception, and operator comfort were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Rating Scale, and a 4-point Likert scale, respectively.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lignocaine
  • Anesthesia, Local
  • Trachea
  • Airway Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Tracheal Diseases

33 studies on the registry are indexed under Tracheal Diseases; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 34 across 22 interventional studies indexed under Tracheal Diseases.

Browse Tracheal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 72 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All consecutive patients indicated for diagnostic bronchoscopy, aged over 18 years, both genders (males and females), hemodynamically stable (defined as systolic blood pressure between 100 and 180 mm Hg), and sedated with an intravenous injection of midazolam at 0.01 mg/kg.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to lignocaine, use of general anesthesia for the procedure or other emergency procedures, pregnancy, comorbidities such as heart failure, advanced chronic kidney disease stage 3-4, chronic liver disease, to sedation, and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry, SpO2 \< 92%)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)

    Participants received: 1. Standard sedation with midazolam (0.01 mg/kg IV); 2. 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before bronchoscopy; 3. Additional 2% lignocaine spray (3 mg/kg): * 2-4 mL sprayed over vocal cords via bronchoscope working channel * Remaining dose as single bolus into larynx/trachea

    Drug: Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) · Drug: Lignocaine Spray (Spray-as-you-go)

  • Active comparator
    Spray-as-you-go (SAYG) Airway Anesthesia

    Participants received: 1. Standard sedation with midazolam (0.01 mg/kg IV); 2. 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before bronchoscopy; 3. 2% lignocaine spray (3 mg/kg) during procedure: * Initial 2-4 mL sprayed over vocal cords * Additional doses in mainstem bronchi during scope advancement

    Drug: Pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) · Drug: Lignocaine Spray (Spray-as-you-go)

Interventions

  • DrugPre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL)

    Administration of 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx before the fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, followed by additional 2% lignocaine spray according to body weight (3 mg/kg)

  • Administration of 2% lignocaine spray via oral scope insertion during the fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, according to body weight (3 mg/kg), with standard procedural sedation with midazolam and initial 2 mL of 4% lignocaine spray in the oropharynx for gag reflex suppression

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient discomfort and operator comfort during fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    This composite outcome evaluates three distinct parameters: 1. Cough severity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (100-mm scale where 0 mm indicates no cough and 100 mm indicates worst possible cough, with higher scores representing worse severity); 2. Pain perception assessed via the Faces Pain Rating Scale (11-point scale from 0 \[no pain\] to 10 \[worst imaginable pain\], where higher scores indicate worse pain); and 3. Operator comfort rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Not comfortable to 4 = Very comfortable, with higher scores reflecting better comfort). All measures will be analyzed separately to compare PPL and SAYG techniques

    Time frame: One year

  2. Visual Analogue Scale

    Cough severity measured using 100-mm Visual Analog Scale where 0 mm = no cough and 100 mm = worst cough imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse cough severity.

    Time frame: One year

  3. Faces Pain Rating Scale

    Pain intensity measured using Faces Pain Rating Scale (0-10) where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible. Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: One year

  4. 4-point Likert scale

    Operator comfort assessed via 4-point Likert scale where 1 = Not comfortable, 2 = Slightly uncomfortable, 3 = Comfortable, and 4 = Very comfortable. Higher scores indicate better comfort.

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedure duration

    Comparison of procedure duration between PPL and SAYG airway anesthesia methods, measured in minutes from scope insertion to withdrawal.

    Time frame: One year

Other outcomes

  1. Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in cough suppression using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    This study will compare the effectiveness of pre-procedure lignocaine spray (PPL) and spray-as-you-go (SAYG) techniques in suppressing cough, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS is a 100-mm scale where 0 = no cough and 100 = worst cough, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: One year

  2. Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in pain control using the Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS)

    This study will compare the effectiveness of PPL and SAYG techniques in pain control, assessed via the Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS). The FPRS is a 0-10 scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: One year

  3. Comparative effectiveness of PPL versus SAYG anesthesia in operator comfort using the Operator Likert Scale

    This study will compare the effectiveness of PPL and SAYG techniques in operator comfort, evaluated using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Not comfortable, 4 = Very comfortable), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute
    Lahore, Punjab Province 54000, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2021 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 12 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 4, 2025
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
StartActual
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07084623
Lead sponsor
Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute
Responsible party
Talha Mahmud (Professor of Pulmonology, Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2022
Completion
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Study contacts

Talha Mahmud, PhD
principal investigator · Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore Pakistan.
Hira Ishtiaq, MD
principal investigator · Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Lahore Pakistan.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lidocaine

Start the discussion