CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07083076Updated Sep 24, 2025

Regular Diet Versus Extended Low Residue After Colon Surgery

An interventional study of Short term (10 day) low residue diet restriction and 6 week low residue diet restriction in Colon Resection, sponsored by Northwell Health. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-24.

Sponsored by Northwell Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
222
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a 10 day low-residue diet restriction is better for bowel function and quality of life without increasing complications compared to a 6 week low-residue diet restriction after elective colon resection surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does a shorter time period of low residue restriction result in a faster return to normal bowel function? Are there any differences in complication rate between a 10 day low-residue diet restriction compared to a 6 week low-residue diet restriction?

Participants will be randomized to one of the two diet plans and will be asked to answer surveys about their bowel function and health care related quality of life at various time points for up to 3 months.

Read the detailed description

Patients who undergo colon resection surgery are often instructed to adhere to a low residue (low insoluble fiber) diet for at least the first 1-2 weeks after surgery. This approach is based on limited previous literature that associates stool burden in the first three to seven days and the risk of leakage from the new connection in the colon (anastomotic leakage). However, there is no clear consensus on how long this low residue diet should last, and low residue diets can negatively affect bowel function-related quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that resuming an unrestricted diet at an earlier time point (10 days) after surgery will improve bowel function-related quality of life without increasing the risk of leakage or other complications compared to a longer time point (6 weeks). Both time points are within the scope of practice, but many surgeons opt for the longer time point. To answer our hypothesis, the investigators plan to use validated survey instruments pre- and postoperatively (at within 2 weeks preoperatively then 1 week, 3 week, 6 week, and 3 months after the surgery) to assess patient's bowel function and health care-related quality of life. Patients will be consented preoperatively and randomized after their surgeries, no later than the day of discharge from the hospital. The participants will take a survey before surgery then have their surgery as the participants normally would. The participants will also have their post-surgery hospital care as normal and before discharge will be instructed on which diet plan the participants must follow (either 10 days or 6 weeks of low residue diet). Patients who have postoperative issues while in the hospital will be excluded, as the participants usually have different postoperative diet recommendations outside of the typical post-surgical pathway. Other than the surveys and different diet instructions, nothing else will change about their post-surgical care. The results of the surveys for each group will be evaluated in several ways. Summary statistics will be obtained to characterize both the intervention and control group. In addition, the pre and post-surgical results will be compared. Other information will be collected, such as demographic information and complication rate, that will be used to compare both groups as well. These results and the subsequent analysis will address our hypothesis and allow us to either recommend a 10-day period of low residue diet or confirm that the 6-week period is safer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colon Resection

Keywords

  • postoperative diet
  • low residue diet
  • colon resection with anastomosis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwell Health is the lead sponsor of 463 studies on the registry; 109 are open to participants now.

Of its 40 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients who have elective colon resection with anastomosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have an ostomy as part of their surgery
  • Patients who undergo emergency surgery
  • Patients who do not follow the enhanced recovery protocol (the standard postoperative protocol for patients undergoing elective colon resection)
  • Patients less than 18 years of age
  • Vulnerable populations: fetuses, pregnant women, children, cognitively impaired, hospital employees, students, healthy controls, prisoners, and other institutionalized individuals
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
222 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 day low residue diet restriction after surgery

    10 day low residue diet restriction after surgery

    Other: Short term (10 day) low residue diet restriction

  • Other
    6 week low residue diet restriction after surgery

    Usual care arm

    Other: 6 week low residue diet restriction

Interventions

  • OtherShort term (10 day) low residue diet restriction

    Patients will have an unrestricted diet (as opposed to a low residue diet restriction) 10 days after surgery.

  • Other6 week low residue diet restriction

    Patients will be restricted to a low residue diet for 6 weeks after surgery. After this period, their diet will be unrestricted.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Return to baseline bowel function (Postoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score - Preoperative Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score <=5)

    Return to baseline bowel function is defined by comparing the preoperative LARS score (range 0-42) to postoperative LARS score (range 0-42). Return to baseline is defined as a difference equal to or less than 5 when subtracting the postoperative score by the preoperative score.

    Time frame: Preoperative to 3 months postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Bowel Function Related Quality of Life

    This is a single question survey asking patients about the impact their bowel function has on their quality of life. These answers will be accumulated and compared across both groups. From better to worse, the answers are: A) not at all, B) very little, C) somewhat, D) a lot.

    Time frame: preoperative to 3 months postoperative

  2. Health Care Related Quality of Life

    This outcome measure is based on 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) scores which will be averaged, separated in its components, and compared across groups. Each component is scored from 0 - 100 based on responses from the participants, with 100 being the best possible score.

    Time frame: preoperative to 3 months postoperative

Other outcomes

  1. Complication Rate

    Complications, if any occur, will be recorded for each group and incidence of complications will be compared across groups.

    Time frame: Preoperative to 2 years postoperative

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kawada K, Wada T, Yamamoto T, Itatani Y, Hida K, Obama K. Correlation between Colon Perfusion and Postoperative Fecal Output through a Transanal Drainage Tube during Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection. Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 8;14(9):2328. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092328. PubMed 35565456 ↗
  • Lau C, Phillips E, Bresee C, Fleshner P. Early use of low residue diet is superior to clear liquid diet after elective colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):641-7; discussion 647-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000929. PubMed 25203881 ↗
  • Vanhauwaert E, Matthys C, Verdonck L, De Preter V. Low-residue and low-fiber diets in gastrointestinal disease management. Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):820-7. doi: 10.3945/an.115.009688. Print 2015 Nov. PubMed 26567203 ↗
  • Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Breaking strength and collagen in the colonic wall following left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat. Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150(8):671-5. PubMed 6532041 ↗
  • Uden P, Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Influence of long-term relative bowel rest on the healing of a left colon anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988 Nov;31(11):886-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02554855. PubMed 3180961 ↗
  • Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21. PubMed 22504191 ↗
  • He S, Zhang J, Wang R, Li L, Sun W, Wang J, Deng Y, Liang W, Dou R. Long-term Changes in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Jun 1;67(6):834-840. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Mar 1. PubMed 38426539 ↗
  • Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6846.160. PubMed 1285753 ↗
  • Wang A, Robitaille S, Liberman S, Feldman LS, Fiore JF Jr, Lee L. Does the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score Accurately Represent the Impact of Bowel Dysfunction on Health-Related Quality of Life? J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jan;27(1):114-121. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05481-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17. PubMed 36253504 ↗
  • Battersby NJ, Juul T, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Emmertsen KJ, Norton C, Hughes R, Laurberg S, Moran BJ; United Kingdom Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Study Group. Predicting the Risk of Bowel-Related Quality-of-Life Impairment After Restorative Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):270-80. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000552. PubMed 26953985 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We do not intend to share IPD with other researchers. Data deidentified through REDCap may be shared upon publication of results if requested by the journal and in compliance with IRB requirements.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07083076
Lead sponsor
Northwell Health
Responsible party
Andrea Zimmern (Assistant Professor of Surgery Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Sep 19, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2025

Study contacts

Andrea Zimmern, MD
Contact
azimmern@northwell.edu
516-730-2100
Russell J Hollis, MD
Contact
rhollis1@northwell.edu
Andrea Zimmern, MD
principal investigator · Northwell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion