CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07079527Updated Jul 23, 2025

Effects of Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure and Non-invasive Continuous Positive Air Pressure in COPD Patients

An interventional study of Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Therapy and Non-Invasive CPAP Therapy in COPD, sponsored by Riphah International University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-23.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Nov 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Non-Invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A total of 42 patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: one receiving manual PEEP therapy and the other receiving CPAP therapy, over a 4-week period. The primary goal is to assess and compare improvements in respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO₂), and patient-reported breathlessness and comfort using standardized tools such as pulse oximetry, digital spirometry, the Borg dyspnea scale, and the COPD Assessment Test. The study is designed as a single-blind randomized trial and will be conducted at Imran Idrees and Allama Iqbal Memorial Hospitals in Sialkot. The outcomes are expected to guide better non-invasive management strategies for COPD patients to enhance clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This randomized clinical trial investigates the comparative effectiveness of Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) and Non-Invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). COPD is a progressive respiratory condition characterized by airflow limitation, leading to breathlessness, decreased exercise tolerance, and frequent hospitalizations. Non-invasive ventilation techniques such as PEEP and CPAP are widely used to manage respiratory symptoms and improve lung function in these patients, but direct comparisons of their efficacy remain limited.

A total of 42 patients with Stage 3 or 4 COPD, aged over 40 years, will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups:

Group A will receive manual PEEP therapy

Group B will receive non-invasive CPAP therapy

The intervention will last four weeks, and all patients will receive baseline treatment in the form of Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBTs). The study will be conducted at Imran Idrees Teaching Hospital and Allama Iqbal Memorial Hospital, Sialkot.

Primary outcome measures include improvements in:

Oxygen saturation (SpO₂)

Respiratory rate

Patient-reported breathlessness (using the Borg scale)

Quality of life and symptom severity (using the COPD Assessment Test)

Data collection tools include pulse oximetry, digital spirometry (for FEV₁, FVC, PEF), and standardized questionnaires. The study uses a single-blind design, where the assessor is blinded to the group allocation.

The purpose is to determine which intervention-manual PEEP or CPAP-offers superior clinical outcomes, patient comfort, and symptom relief. Findings from this research aim to support evidence-based decision-making for non-invasive COPD management in clinical settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • COPD

Keywords

  • COPD, Posotive end expiratory pressure, CPAP
03

In context

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

4,131 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; 697 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 42 is below the median of 70 across 2,926 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive.

Browse Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age>40years old
  • SevereCOPDpatients with Stage 3 \& 4 according to Gold Criteria
  • Notcurrently experiencing an acute exacerbation.
  • Baseline Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 70% of predicted
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Othersignificant respiratory diseases (e.g., asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis)
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Pregnant or Breastfeeding women
  • Cardiac arrhythmias or instability
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Manual PEEP Therapy

    Participants in this group receive Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) therapy. The therapy is administered using a tight-fitting mask that applies positive pressure at the end of expiration to keep alveoli open, enhance oxygenation, reduce airway collapse, and improve breathing efficiency. Sessions follow a standardized protocol over a 4-week period. All participants also receive Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBTs) as baseline therapy.

    Device: Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Therapy

  • Experimental
    Non-Invasive CPAP Therapy

    Participants in this group receive Non-Invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy. CPAP delivers a constant level of positive pressure throughout the respiratory cycle using a non-invasive ventilator. This helps reduce the work of breathing, improve gas exchange, and relieve symptoms of dyspnea. The intervention is delivered according to a standardized protocol for 4 weeks, along with baseline ACBTs.

    Device: Non-Invasive CPAP Therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceManual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Therapy

    Participants in this group receive Manual Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) therapy. The intervention is delivered using a tight-fitting mask that applies positive pressure at the end of expiration, helping to keep the alveoli open, enhance oxygenation, and prevent airway collapse. The therapy is administered according to a structured protocol over a 4-week period, aiming to reduce breathlessness, improve lung function, and support ventilation. Along with PEEP, participants also receive baseline Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBTs) for airway clearance and breathing control.

  • DeviceNon-Invasive CPAP Therapy

    Participants in this group receive Non-Invasive Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy. CPAP provides a constant level of positive pressure throughout the entire breathing cycle using a non-invasive ventilator and a full-face or nasal mask. This therapy improves gas exchange, reduces the work of breathing, and eases symptoms such as dyspnea. Like Group A, CPAP therapy is delivered following a standardized protocol for 4 weeks, and participants also perform baseline ACBTs to support respiratory function.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in SpO₂ (Oxygen Saturation) from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Oxygen saturation (%) will be measured using a pulse oximeter before and after the 4-week intervention. The average change in SpO₂ will be compared within and between both groups.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Change in Respiratory Rate (RR) from Baseline to Post-Intervention

    Respiratory rate (breaths per minute) will be recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks. Lower respiratory rate post-intervention reflects clinical improvement.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Borg Dyspnea Scale Score from Baseline to Post-Intervention at 4 weeks

    The Borg Dyspnea Scale, a 0-10 point subjective scale, will be used to evaluate the severity of dyspnea in COPD patients. A score of 0 represents no breathlessness, and a score of 10 represents maximal breathlessness. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (i.e., more severe dyspnea). Measurements will be taken at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. The primary analysis will focus on the change in median score from pre- to post-intervention within and between groups. MaximumHigher scores indicate worse dyspnea (more severe breathlessness) score: 10

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Distance Walked during 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Total distance walked (in meters) during the 6MWT will be recorded. Higher distance reflects improved functional capacity.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arjumand
    Lahore, Punjab Province 40100, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07079527
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 23, 2025
Start date
Jul 28, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2025

Study contacts

imran amjad, phd
Contact
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
03324390125
Arjumand Bano, Ms CPPT
Contact
arjumand.bano@riphah.edu.pk
03059551883
Arjumand Bano, Ms CPPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion