CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07067814RLNUpdated Jul 16, 2025

Comparison Between Two Techniques During Thyroidectomy (Conventional Dissection Technique and Injection of Methylene Blue Dye Into Inferior Thyroid Artery Technique) Regarding Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification and Preservation

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Methylene blue group and Methylene blue group in Time Taken for Identification of Single Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve and Intra-operative Blood Loss, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2023, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the value of injection of methylene blue dye into the inferior thyroid artery for the help of the identification and dissection of recurrent laryngeal nerve, so thyroidectomy could be done with fewer complications in comparison to conventional technique

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of methylene blue dye injection into the inferior thyroid artery for enhancing the intraoperative visualization of the RLN during thyroidectomy. Also, this method was compared to conventional RLN identification techniques in terms of nerve identification time, blood loss, complication rates, and postoperative outcomes, while assessing the safety and feasibility of using methylene blue in thyroid surgery.

The study included 40 patients with indications for thyroidectomy due to benign thyroid conditions. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups:

  • Group A: 20 patients underwent injection of methylene blue dye into the inferior thyroid artery to aid in identifying the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN).
  • Group B: 20 patients underwent conventional RLN identification during thyroidectomy.
02

Conditions studied

  • Time Taken for Identification of Single Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
  • Intra-operative Blood Loss

Keywords

  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve identification
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients who present with simple nodular goiter, solitary thyroid nodule, controlled toxic goiter and failed medical treatment with indication for thyroidectomy.
  • Patents undergoing primary surgery (not recurrent).
  • Patients who are willing to undergo surgery under general anesthesia without any preoperative complications or major diseases.
  • Either gender in the age group of 18-60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous thyroid surgery.
  • Malignant goiter.
  • Major cardiac diseases, renal diseases or patients who are unfit for surgery.
  • Methylene blue allergies.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
  • Presence of any preoperative cord pathology or patients with dysphonia.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Methylene blue group

    After ligation of the superior pole, 0.5-1 ml of sterile methylene blue dye was injected into the inferior thyroid artery. The thyroid tissue absorbed the dye, while the RLN remained unstained, appearing as a white structure in the tracheoesophageal groove. This aided in its early and safe identification, reducing the risk of injury during dissection.

    Drug: Methylene blue group · Procedure: Methylene blue group

  • No intervention
    Conventional technique group

    the RLN was identified based on conventional anatomical landmarks without the use of dye. The nerve was traced along its expected course near the inferior thyroid artery and ligament of Berry

Interventions

  • DrugMethylene blue group

    After ligation of the superior pole, 0.5-1 ml of sterile methylene blue dye was injected into the inferior thyroid artery. The thyroid tissue absorbed the dye, while the RLN remained unstained, appearing as a white structure in the tracheoesophageal groove. This aided in its early and safe identification, reducing the risk of injury during dissection.

  • ProcedureMethylene blue group

    After ligation of the superior pole, 0.5-1 ml of sterile methylene blue dye was injected into the inferior thyroid artery. The thyroid tissue absorbed the dye, while the RLN remained unstained, appearing as a white structure in the tracheoesophageal groove. This aided in its early and safe identification, reducing the risk of injury during dissection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Easy and fast identification of recurrent laryngeal nerve

    Thyroid gland absorbed the dye and got stained blue while the RLN didn't take the dye and appeared as a white structure in the tracheoesophageal groove

    Time frame: Procedure (Time taken for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve after delivery of thyroid lobe (in minutes))

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lower intra-operative blood loss

    Intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the Methylene blue group in comparison to conventional technique

    Time frame: The duration of the procedure ranging from one to two hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ain Shams University
    Cairo, Abbassia, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Undecided yet

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07067814
Lead sponsor
Ain Shams University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2025
Completion
Feb 28, 2025
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion