ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07067281Updated Jul 16, 2025

A Comparative Study Between TAPP and Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Surgery

An interventional study of Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair in Hernia Inguinal, sponsored by GSVM Medical College. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-16.

Sponsored by GSVM Medical College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2024, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is comperative study between TAPP And Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery.The Lichtenstein tension-free open hernioplasty involves placing a tailored polypropylene mesh over the inguinal canal defect, secured to ligament and oblique fascia under local/regional anesthesia.Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair uses laparoscopic access via three ports (umbilicus and bilateral midclavicular lines), incises and closes a peritoneal flap, and places a large mesh in the preperitoneal space. Compression between these two procedure in terms of intraoperative ,postoperative complications and Long term follow up for recurrence of Hernia.

Read the detailed description

Comperative study between TAPP And Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery.

Worldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach.

Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using Trans abdominal Pre peritoneal procedure(TAPP) \& Lichtenstein techniques. Primary outcomes are Operative time , Surgical site infection , Seroma , post operative ileus , bowel injury ,mesh infection , recurrence and quality of life .

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia Inguinal

Keywords

  • Trans abdominal preperitoneal repair
  • Operative time
  • Surgical site infection
  • Recurrence
  • Seroma
  • Mesh infection
03

In context

Hernia, Inguinal

543 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 90 across 395 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.

Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →

Lead sponsor

GSVM Medical College is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1. 5 -80 years 2. Any gender 3. Direct Hernia 4. Indirect hernia

-

Exclusion Criteria: 1 . Patient who are not fit for general anesthesia 2. Patient with lateral hernia 3 . Patient with complicated inguinal hernia like instructed and strangulated hernia

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lichtenstein Techniques for Inguinal Hernia surgery using as conventional method

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo open Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair for inguinal hernia under regional (spinal) or local anesthesia. A standard polypropylene mesh will be placed over the inguinal canal posterior wall and fixed to the inguinal ligament and conjoint tendon using non-absorbable sutures. The procedure is performed through a single inguinal incision. Patients will receive perioperative analgesia and standard postoperative care. This technique serves as the control group, reflecting conventional open hernia repair.

    Procedure: Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty

  • Experimental
    TAPP Repair

    Participants in this arm will undergo laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernia under general anesthesia. A standard 3-port laparoscopic technique will be used. After accessing the preperitoneal space, a large polypropylene mesh will be placed to cover the myopectineal orifice and fixed using tacks or glue. The peritoneal flap will be closed using absorbable sutures or staplers. Patients will receive standard laparoscopic postoperative care. This arm represents the minimally invasive surgical option.

    Procedure: Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureLichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Hernioplasty

    Open surgical repair of inguinal hernia using a tension-free mesh technique. A standard polypropylene mesh is placed over the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and fixed with non-absorbable sutures under spinal or local anesthesia. This is a conventional method widely used in open hernia surgery.

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair

    Laparoscopic approach to inguinal hernia repair performed under general anesthesia. Three ports are used to access the abdominal cavity, and a peritoneal flap is created to place a large polypropylene mesh in the preperitoneal space. The mesh is fixed with tacks or glue, and the peritoneal flap is closed. This minimally invasive method is designed to reduce postoperative pain and enhance recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Total duration of surgery in minutes, measure skin incision to reversal of pneumoperitoneum

    Time frame: Intraoperative (measure during surgical procedure on day1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative ileus

    Delayed return of bowel function by flatus or bowel movement, abdominal distention or need for nasogastic tube decompression

    Time frame: Up to 5 days

  2. Surgical site infection

    Superficial and deep wound infection including erythema , discharge or wound dehiscence

    Time frame: Up to 30 days post operation

  3. Hospital stay

    Total number of days the date of operation to discharge from hospital

    Time frame: From date of surgery untill discharge , assessed upto 14days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ganesh Shankar vidhyapthi Memorial Medical college kanpur
    Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participants( IPD ) related to operative time, hospital stay and post operative complications

Supporting information: Clinical study report

Time frame: 6 months after publication of results for 2 years

Access criteria: Qualifed researchers upon reasonable request

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07067281
Lead sponsor
GSVM Medical College
Responsible party
Shubham Chaubey (Junior Resident, Department of General Surgery, GSVM Medical College) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 16, 2025

Study contacts

Shubham Chaubey, Principle investigator, MBBS
principal investigator · GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE KANPUR

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion