ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07061587Updated Jul 11, 2025

Developing A Gout Action Plan in Primary Care Setting in Singapore

An interventional study of Gout action plan in Gout; Hyperuricemia, Gout Flare and Gout Chronic, sponsored by SingHealth Polyclinics. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-11.

Sponsored by SingHealth Polyclinics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop a gout action plan in primary care setting in Singapore among adult patients with gout, and to learn if the gout action plan can improve gout control.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • How do we develop a gout action plan in primary care setting in Singapore?
  • What is the feasibility and estimate effectiveness of the developed gout action plan?
  • Does gout action plan reduce frequency of gout flares in patients with gout?

Researchers will compare gout action plan to usual clinical care to see whether gout action plan helps in improving gout control.

Participants in intervention arm will be:

  • given gout action plan and follow up for a course of 6 months
  • asked to keep track of their gout symptoms
  • follow up on the number of gout flares they have.
Read the detailed description

Gout is a common inflammatory arthritis often seen in primary care. Worldwide prevalence ranges from under 1% to 6.8%.(1) The prevalence of gout has risen over the past three decades, accompanied by an increase in morbidity. (2) In Singapore, prevalence of gout is 4.1% amongst the Singapore Chinese population.(3) Gout is associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to coronary heart disease and kidney disease(3), and has substantial burden and impact in quality of life, with higher healthcare utilization and high unemployment rate observed in middle aged men with gout. (4)

Patients with poorly controlled gout suffer from frequent gout flares, with acute onset of joint pain and swelling, affecting health-related quality of life.(5) A meta-synthesis showed that gout flares impact on patients' lives, including physical, psychological, social and family life. (6) In a primary care institution in Singapore, 28.2% of patients with gout had poorly controlled disease.(7) In a rheumatology clinic in Singapore, 33% of patients with gout visited emergency department at least once for gout flare, while 19.5% had at least one hospitalization for gout.(4)

Acute gout flares can be mitigated by pharmacotherapy. Timely administration of acute medications is important to alleviate the pain leading to early resolution of symptoms. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Guideline 2020 (8) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2016 (9) recommend colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or corticosteroid for treatment of acute gout flare. In primary care clinics in Singapore, colchicine was often prescribed for an acute gout flare.(7) However, colchicine has gastrointestinal side effects such as vomiting and diarrhea (10), and some patients are not aware of its side effects and exceeded prescribed dose. (10) NSAIDs might improve the pain if given within 24 hours. (11) However, NSAIDs are associated with gastrointestinal, renal and cardiovascular adverse effects, thus they may not be the suitable pharmacotherapy for those with renal, gastrointestinal or cardiovascular comorbidities. (12) NSAIDs also cause hypersensitivity reactions with estimated prevalence of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs to be 0.5 to 1.9% of the general population. (13) For patients who are unable to tolerate NSAIDs or colchicine, or have chronic renal disease, systemic corticosteroid such as oral prednisolone might be a good alternative as it provides similar improvement in pain relief. (11,14)

Aside to pharmacotherapy, dietary control is important to prevent gout flares. ACG guideline 2020 (8) includes conditional recommendations to reduce alcohol intake, adopt a low-purine diet, and prioritize weight loss. A meta-analysis showed that red meat, seafood, alcohol, fructose or sweetened soft drinks increase risk of gout and hyperuricemia, while consumption of soy foods, dairy products and vegetables reduce risk of gout. (15) However, there is lack of awareness in dietary triggers especially in those with active gout. (16) A recent study in Australia found that patients with gout lack knowledge about the risk and protective factors of gout. (17) Patients resisted dietary changes due to the restrictive nature of the diet, lack of resources for information, and perceived it as unrealistic and unmanageable. (18 )

Gout control remains suboptimal despite established guideline. Urate lowering therapy (ULT) remains the key in gout management and its initiation is recommended for patients with recurrent gout flares with treat-to-target strategy. (8) However, in primary care institution in Singapore, it was found that half of the patients with poorly controlled gout were not prescribed urate lowering therapy.(7) In patients with gout, the overall adherence rate to ULT is as low as 47%.(19) Patients with gout demonstrate poor adherence to urate lowering therapy as they have limited knowledge of gout and its treatment, their attitude and perception towards taking long term medications. Some patients avoid ULT due to fear of side effects or flares during initiation, leading to nonadherence. (20)

Self-management is important in the management of chronic diseases. (21) Interventions of self-management have been shown to improve self-efficacy, health behavior, subsequently improving health status and quality of life and reducing healthcare utilization. (22) Self-efficacy refers to an individual's belief in their capacity to execute behaviors necessary to produce specific performance attainments, and it is correlated with self-care. Raising self-efficacy is important to change behavior in self-care. (23)

An action plan is a patient-held guide to support self-management with educational value. In chronic diseases such as asthma, the action plan provides information on how to manage the disease on a day-to-day basis and has proven to encourage self-management, improve health outcomes and quality of life, and reduce unscheduled visits to physicians. (24,25) Likewise, gout is a chronic condition with acute gout flares intermittently, that will benefit from self-management. In a study in Malaysia, patients were capable in self-management of gout but to variable extent, some practice diet control, some use painkillers during acute gout attacks, some use traditional medicine rather than taking allopurinol, some use exercise or stress-reducing activities, and the type of self-management might be influenced by cultural and social factors. (26)

To our knowledge, there is no well recognized gout action plan. A gout action plan has not been subjected to prior development in terms of content, design and acceptability. We hope that by developing a gout action plan, it will give information to patients about the disease to raise knowledge on gout, to reduce frequency of exacerbation via dietary control and lifestyle measures, to provide information on pain relief medications and the risks of taking painkiller, and urate lowering therapy for those with recurrent gout flares, and safety-netting advice on when to seek help. The study thus aims to develop a prototype of gout action plan by incorporating patients' and primary care physicians' perspectives, hoping to improve quality of life and healthcare utilization among patients with gout.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gout; Hyperuricemia
  • Gout Flare
  • Gout Chronic

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gout action plan
  • action plan
03

In context

Gout

345 studies on the registry are indexed under Gout; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is below the median of 83 across 286 interventional studies indexed under Gout.

Browse Gout studies →

Lead sponsor

SingHealth Polyclinics is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

For patient participants:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults who are 21 years old and above
  • Clinical diagnosis of gout as per ACE-EULAR 2015 criteria
  • Had at least an episode of gout exacerbation within the last 1 year
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Singapore citizens or permanent residents
  • Able to provide

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental disorders
  • Cognitive impairment
  • Hearing and/ or speech impairments
  • Pregnant
  • Known terminal illness
  • Unable to provide informed consent

For healthcare professionals:

Inclusion Criteria (for healthcare professionals):

  • Currently still in clinical practice
  • Manage gout in their clinical practice

Exclusion Criteria (for healthcare professionals):

  • Not involved in gout management in the practice
  • No longer in clinical practice
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control arm

    Usual clinical care for this arm. No intervention delivered.

  • Active comparator
    Intervention arm

    Patients in intervention arm will receive gout action plan on top of usual clinical care.

    Behavioral: Gout action plan

Interventions

  • BehavioralGout action plan

    Gout action plan (that we aim to develop and refine during the study based on traffic light color system which will be categorized into zone system- green zone (well controlled), yellow zone (mild symptoms), red zone (severe symptoms). It will outline how to manage gout, identifying triggers, recognizing symptoms, appropriate medication usage, and when to seek medical attention)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Creation of a gout action plan in primary care setting in Singapore

    in-depth interviews or focus group discussions to develop and refine prototype of gout action plan by gathering perspectives from both patients and healthcare providers.

    Time frame: from enrolment to the end of in-depth interviews or focus group discussions at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the number of gout flares at 6 months

    patient self-reported gout flares or visit to healthcare professionals for gout flares

    Time frame: from enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 months

  2. Change of serum uric acid level from baseline at 6 months

    serum uric level will be measured via laboratory test

    Time frame: from enrolment to end of intervention at 6 months

  3. change from baseline in health-related quality of life at 6 months

    participants achieved good quality of life on a scale ranging from 0 (worse quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life) using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire on health-related quality of life

    Time frame: from enrolment to the end of intervention at 6 months

  4. Numbers of participants consented to join the study among those approached (participation rate)

    participation rate will be counted at looking at proportion of participants consented to join the study compared to total number of participants approached to join the study

    Time frame: from enrolment to end of intervention at 6 months

  5. number of participants drop out of study (dropout rate)

    dropout rate will be counted by looking at number of participants drop out of the study compared to number of participants consented

    Time frame: from enrolment to end of intervention at 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sivasegaran S, Hanafi NSH. Perceptions and practices of self-management among adult patients with gout at a primary care clinic: A qualitative study. Malays Fam Physician. 2023 Dec 18;18:72. doi: 10.51866/oa.428. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38213387 ↗
  • Hodkinson A, Bower P, Grigoroglou C, Zghebi SS, Pinnock H, Kontopantelis E, Panagioti M. Self-management interventions to reduce healthcare use and improve quality of life among patients with asthma: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020 Aug 18;370:m2521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2521. PubMed 32816816 ↗
  • Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Haywood P, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, Walters EH. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD001117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001117. PubMed 12535399 ↗
  • Tan FCJH, Oka P, Dambha-Miller H, Tan NC. The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Feb 22;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01391-2. PubMed 33618661 ↗
  • Allegrante JP, Wells MT, Peterson JC. Interventions to Support Behavioral Self-Management of Chronic Diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:127-146. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044008. Epub 2019 Jan 2. PubMed 30601717 ↗
  • Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01. PubMed 12867348 ↗
  • Spragg JCJ, Michael TJF, Aslani P, Coleshill MJ, Chan JS, Day RO, Stocker SL. Optimizing adherence to allopurinol for gout: patients' perspectives. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul;89(7):1978-1991. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15657. Epub 2023 Jan 25. PubMed 36607199 ↗
  • Yin R, Li L, Zhang G, Cui Y, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Fu T, Cao H, Li L, Gu Z. Rate of adherence to urate-lowering therapy among patients with gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 10;8(4):e017542. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017542. PubMed 29643150 ↗
  • Liddle J, Richardson JC, Hider SL, Mallen CD, Watson L, Chandratre P, Roddy E. 'It's just a great muddle when it comes to food': a qualitative exploration of patient decision-making around diet and gout. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021 Aug 13;5(3):rkab055. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab055. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34514294 ↗
  • Chin A, Adams RJ, Gill TK, Hill CL. Gout Knowledge: A Survey of Australian Outpatients with Gout. Open Access Rheumatol. 2024 Jan 13;16:1-7. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S435692. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38239283 ↗
  • Harrold LR, Mazor KM, Peterson D, Naz N, Firneno C, Yood RA. Patients' knowledge and beliefs concerning gout and its treatment: a population based study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 21;13:180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-180. PubMed 22995041 ↗
  • Li R, Yu K, Li C. Dietary factors and risk of gout and hyperuricemia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(6):1344-1356. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.201811_27(6).0022. PubMed 30485934 ↗
  • Rainer TH, Cheng CH, Janssens HJ, Man CY, Tam LS, Choi YF, Yau WH, Lee KH, Graham CA. Oral Prednisolone in the Treatment of Acute Gout: A Pragmatic, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 5;164(7):464-71. doi: 10.7326/M14-2070. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PubMed 26903390 ↗
  • Sanchez-Borges M, Caballero-Fonseca F, Capriles-Hulett A, Gonzalez-Aveledo L. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: An Update. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Jan 5;3(1):10-18. doi: 10.3390/ph3010010. PubMed 27713240 ↗
  • Harirforoosh S, Asghar W, Jamali F. Adverse effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: an update of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and renal complications. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2013;16(5):821-47. doi: 10.18433/j3vw2f. PubMed 24393558 ↗
  • van Durme CM, Wechalekar MD, Landewe RB, Pardo Pardo J, Cyril S, van der Heijde D, Buchbinder R. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 9;12(12):CD010120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010120.pub3. PubMed 34882311 ↗
  • Rebello C, Thomson M, Bassett-Clarke D, Martini N. Patient awareness, knowledge and use of colchicine: an exploratory qualitative study in the Counties Manukau region, Auckland, New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;8(2):140-8. doi: 10.1071/HC15023. PubMed 27477556 ↗
  • Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castaneda-Sanabria J, Coyfish M, Guillo S, Jansen TL, Janssens H, Liote F, Mallen C, Nuki G, Perez-Ruiz F, Pimentao J, Punzi L, Pywell T, So A, Tausche AK, Uhlig T, Zavada J, Zhang W, Tubach F, Bardin T. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):29-42. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707. Epub 2016 Jul 25. PubMed 27457514 ↗
  • FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, Gelber AC, Harrold LR, Khanna D, King C, Levy G, Libbey C, Mount D, Pillinger MH, Rosenthal A, Singh JA, Sims JE, Smith BJ, Wenger NS, Bae SS, Danve A, Khanna PP, Kim SC, Lenert A, Poon S, Qasim A, Sehra ST, Sharma TSK, Toprover M, Turgunbaev M, Zeng L, Zhang MA, Turner AS, Neogi T. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):744-760. doi: 10.1002/acr.24180. Epub 2020 May 11. PubMed 32391934 ↗
  • Oka P, Chong WM, Ng DX, Aau WK, Tan NC. Epidemiology and risk factors associated with gout control among adult Asians: a real-world retrospective cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 7;10:1253839. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1253839. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37746085 ↗
  • Stewart S, Guillen AG, Taylor WJ, Gaffo A, Slark J, Gott M, Dalbeth N. The experience of a gout flare: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020 Aug;50(4):805-811. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 9. PubMed 32554059 ↗
  • Proudman C, Lester SE, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Gill TK, Dalbeth N, Hill CL. Gout, flares, and allopurinol use: a population-based study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 31;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1918-7. PubMed 31151457 ↗
  • Chua CKT, Cheung PP, Santosa A, Lim AYN, Teng GG. Burden and management of gout in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort. Rheumatol Int. 2020 Jul;40(7):1029-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04475-6. Epub 2019 Nov 22. PubMed 31758246 ↗
  • Teng GG, Ang LW, Saag KG, Yu MC, Yuan JM, Koh WP. Mortality due to coronary heart disease and kidney disease among middle-aged and elderly men and women with gout in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):924-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.200523. Epub 2011 Dec 15. PubMed 22172492 ↗
  • He Q, Mok TN, Sin TH, Yin J, Li S, Yin Y, Ming WK, Feng B. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence of Gout From 1990 to 2019: Age-Period-Cohort Analysis With Future Burden Prediction. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jun 7;9:e45943. doi: 10.2196/45943. PubMed 37285198 ↗
  • Dehlin M, Jacobsson L, Roddy E. Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;16(7):380-390. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-0441-1. Epub 2020 Jun 15. PubMed 32541923 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared as gout action plan is still yet to be developed and the study will firstly started with qualitative research to refine the prototype of gout action plan.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2025; primary completion for May 2026, 9 months later.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Gout, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 2, 2025
First posted
Jul 11, 2025
StartEst.
Aug 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Jul 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07061587
Lead sponsor
SingHealth Polyclinics
Responsible party
Liew Siew Lee (Family Physician, SingHealth Polyclinics) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2025
Start date
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 11, 2025

Study contacts

Siew Lee Liew, Master of Family Medicine
Contact
liew.siew.lee@singhealth.com.sg
+6593483312

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion