An interventional study of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Conventional therapy group in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-24.
Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The main questions it aims to answer is:
Whether HBO can improve the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients after endovascular treatment?
receive HBO (1.6 Atmosphere Absolute,1.6ATA),Once a day, for 1 hour each time, for 5 days a week (it can be non-consecutive days), the total course of treatment is 10 times.
undergo three scheduled face to face or telephone follow-up assessments during the 12-month period following HBO.
2,593 studies on the registry are indexed under Ischemic Stroke; 930 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 424 is above the median of 120 across 1,752 interventional studies indexed under Ischemic Stroke.
Browse Ischemic Stroke studies →Beijing Chao Yang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Other: Conventional therapy group
1.6 atmosphere absolute (1.6 ATA), HBO treatment administrated via mask or hood, one 60 minutes session, once daily, 5 days a week (can be non consecutive days), with a total of 10 sessions.
Conventional therapy
The proportion of patients with a favorable prognosis (mRS score of 0-2 ) after randomization at 90 (±7) days
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is defined as the gold standard for measuring global functional outcomes after stroke: 0-1 indicating functional independence, 0-2 favorable prognosis, defining functional independence, 4-5 Severely disabled, 6 death. Higher mRS scores indicate worse prognosis.
Time frame: Day 90 (±7) post-randomization
Core infarction volume on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
The effectiveness of HBO for patients with acute ischemic stroke was evaluated based on the core cerebral infarction volume.
Time frame: Day 10 (±1)post-randomization
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)score [(0, Normal)-(42, worst)]
The effectiveness of HBO therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment was evaluated based on the improvement rate of NIHSS score day 10 post-randomization.
Time frame: Day 10(±1) NIHSS score post-randomization
mRS score [ (0, Normal)-(6, worst)]
To assess the effectiveness of HBO treament for ischemic stroke using mRS score on day 10, 30, 90 and 360 post-randomization
Time frame: Day 10 (±1)post-randomization; Day 30(±3) post-randomization; Day 180(±14) post-randomization; Day 360(±30) post-randomization.
Distribution of mRS score [(0, normal)-6(worst)]
mRS (0-1): the proportion of functional independence; mRS (0-2): the proportion of good prognosis; mRS (4-6) : the proportion of severe disability.
Time frame: Day 90 (±7) post-randomization
Bartherl index (BI)[(0, worst)-(100, normal)]
Functional independence was assessed using the BI
Time frame: Day 30(±3), 90(±7) , 180(±14) and 360 (±30) post-randomization
EuroQol 5-Dimensions(EQ-5D)[(0, worst)-(100, normal)]
Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D.
Time frame: Day 30(±3), 90(±7), 180(±14), 360(±30) post-randomization
Stroke recurrence rate
New symptoms persisting for \> 24 hours and new lension on the DWI.
Time frame: Day 30(±3) , 90(±7d), 180(±14d) and 360(±30) post-randomization
Plan to share: Yes — 1. Primary/secondary efficacy endpoint data 2. Safety data 3. Baseline characteristic dataset 4. Plan Deviation Record
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital