CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07040657Updated Jun 27, 2025

Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue

An interventional study of Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection in Endometrial Neoplasms, Endometrial Cancer Stage I and Sentinel Lymph Node, sponsored by Dokuz Eylul University. Recruiting at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-27.

Sponsored by Dokuz Eylul University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This clinical trial evaluates lymph node mapping in newly diagnosed endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery. The standard technique uses a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection. The study aims to determine if increasing injection points improves mapping success.

Read the detailed description

In recent years, Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) mapping has become a key focus in improving surgical outcomes for endometrial cancer. While methylene blue is a cost-effective option for SLN mapping, its detection rates remain suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate whether increasing the injection points from the standard 2-point to a 4-point methylene blue injection improves SLN mapping success.

This randomized controlled trial will include patients with preoperative stage I endometrial carcinoma. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive a 2-point methylene blue cervical injection, and the other group will receive a 4-point injection.

The primary endpoint is the difference in SLN detection rates between the two techniques. Findings from this study will provide detailed insights into whether the 4-point injection offers a significant advantage over the standard 2-point method.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrial Neoplasms
  • Endometrial Cancer Stage I
  • Sentinel Lymph Node
  • Metastasis

Keywords

  • endometrial neoplasm
  • methylene blue
  • metastasis
  • cervix
03

In context

Endometrial Neoplasms

1,325 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms; 447 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 941 interventional studies indexed under Endometrial Neoplasms.

Browse Endometrial Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Dokuz Eylul University is the lead sponsor of 252 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer based on CT and PET-CT imaging.
  • Individuals with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical Conditions

  • Individuals diagnosed with dementia.
  • Individuals with allergies to methylene blue or iodine.
  • Individuals who have received active treatment for another malignancy within the past five years.
  • Inability to successfully perform PLD (pelvic lymphadenectomy) or history of prior PLD.
  • Women with multiple and confluent lymph nodes identified as positive on FDG-PET/CT (such cases are not considered stage I).

Cancer-Related Conditions

  • Individuals with clinically or radiologically identified positive lymph nodes or metastatic disease.
  • Individuals with a history of pelvic dissection and/or radiation therapy.
  • Individuals with advanced cervical or uterine cancer.
  • Individuals with T3/T4 lesions.
  • Individuals with cervical tumors larger than 2 cm.

Organ Dysfunction

  • Individuals with hepatic dysfunction and a MELD score ≥ 10 and creatinine ≥ 2·0 mg/dl patients.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2- Point Methylene Blue Injection

    In the 2-point injection arm, participants will receive the standard sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping technique using methylene blue. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into two specific locations on the cervix: At the 3 o'clock position At the 9 o'clock position

    Procedure: Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection

  • Active comparator
    4- Point Methylene Blue Injection

    In the 4-point injection arm, participants will receive the standard sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping technique using methylene blue. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into two specific locations on the cervix: At the 2 o'clock position At the 4 o'clock position At the 8 o'clock position At the 10 o'clock position

    Procedure: Sentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection

Interventions

  • ProcedureSentinel Lymph Node Detection/Cervical Methylene Blue Injection

    Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) detection using cervical methylene blue injection is a surgical technique designed to identify the primary lymph nodes responsible for draining the uterus in patients with endometrial cancer. The procedure involves injecting methylene blue dye into specific locations within the cervical stroma to enable lymphatic uptake. The dye subsequently travels through the lymphatic channels, allowing for intraoperative visual identification of the sentinel nodes. This targeted approach facilitates selective SLN excision for pathological evaluation, providing critical information about lymphatic involvement while minimizing the extent of surgical dissection. The effectiveness of SLN mapping is contingent upon the accuracy of the injection technique and the anatomical distribution of lymphatic drainage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Detection Rate

    The detection rate will be measured as the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified using methylene blue divided by the total number of lymph nodes excised during surgery. Comparison will be made between the two-point and four-point cervical injection techniques. (Unit of Measure: Proportion (%))

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Sensitivity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases

    Sensitivity will be calculated as the proportion of true positive SLNs (confirmed by histopathology) over the total number of lymph nodes with metastases. (Unit of Measure: Percentage (%))

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. Specificity of SLN Biopsy for Detecting Lymph Node Metastases

    Description: Specificity will be calculated as the proportion of true negative SLNs over all lymph nodes without metastasis. (Unit of Measure: Percentage (%))

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Rate of Positive SLNs Detected

    Proportion of SLNs identified as positive for metastasis in each injection technique group. (Unit of Measure: Proportion (%))

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedure Duration

    Total time in minutes from injection to identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), recorded and compared between two-point and four-point cervical injection techniques. (Unit of Measure: Minutes)

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Complications and Side Effects - Injection-Related Side Effects

    Incidence of side effects related to methylene blue injection (e.g., allergic reaction, local pain, or discoloration at the injection site), recorded during and after the procedure. (Unit of Measure: Number of events and proportion (%))

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. SLN Anatomical Distribution

    Number and proportion of detected SLNs located in specific anatomical regions (e.g., pelvic, para-aortic) for each injection technique. (Unit of Measure: Number and Proportion (%))

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. Surgical Complications

    Incidence of postoperative complications related to SLN mapping, including infection, hematoma, and lymphedema. (Unit of Measure: Number of events and proportion (%))

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Ankara University
    Ankara, 06230, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Salih Taskin, MD · Contact · +905064383629
    • Salih Taskin, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Dokuz Eylul University
    Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sehnal B, Waldauf P, Matej R, Hruda M, Robova H, Drozenova J, Pichlik T, Zapletal J, Rob L, Halaska MJ. Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14037-8. PubMed 40200256 ↗
  • Holloway RW, Abu-Rustum NR, Backes FJ, Boggess JF, Gotlieb WH, Jeffrey Lowery W, Rossi EC, Tanner EJ, Wolsky RJ. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Aug;146(2):405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 28. PubMed 28566221 ↗
  • Salman L, Cusimano MC, Marchocki Z, Ferguson SE. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Current evidence and practice. J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;129(1):117-119. doi: 10.1002/jso.27550. Epub 2023 Dec 7. PubMed 38059317 ↗
  • Leitao MM Jr, Zhou QC, Gomez-Hidalgo NR, Iasonos A, Baser R, Mezzancello M, Chang K, Ward J, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Sonoda Y, Brown CL, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Jewell EL, Broach V, Zivanovic O, Dowdy SC, Mariani A, Abu-Rustum NR. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery for endometrial carcinoma: Prevalence of lower-extremity lymphedema after sentinel lymph node mapping versus lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;156(1):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 25. PubMed 31780238 ↗
  • Terada S, Tanaka T, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Daimon A, Miyamoto S, Nishie R, Ueda S, Hashida S, Morita N, Maruoka H, Konishi H, Kogata Y, Taniguchi K, Komura K, Ohmichi M. Lymphatic Complications Following Sentinel Node Biopsy or Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 7;12(13):4540. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134540. PubMed 37445574 ↗
  • Altin D, Taskin S, Ortac F, Tokgozoglu N, Vatansever D, Guler AH, Gungor M, Tasci T, Bese T, Turan H, Kahramanoglu I, Yalcin I, Celik C, Demirkiran F, Kose F, Arvas M, Ayhan A, Taskiran C. Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in non-endometrioid, high-grade and/or deep myoinvasive endometrial cancer: A Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-006). Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PubMed 35033380 ↗
  • Niikura H, Kaiho-Sakuma M, Tokunaga H, Toyoshima M, Utsunomiya H, Nagase S, Takano T, Watanabe M, Ito K, Yaegashi N. Tracer injection sites and combinations for sentinel lymph node detection in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Nov;131(2):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Aug 27. PubMed 23988415 ↗
  • Geppert B, Lonnerfors C, Bollino M, Arechvo A, Persson J. A study on uterine lymphatic anatomy for standardization of pelvic sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 May;145(2):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10. PubMed 28196672 ↗
  • Perrone AM, Casadio P, Formelli G, Levorato M, Ghi T, Costa S, Meriggiola MC, Pelusi G. Cervical and hysteroscopic injection for identification of sentinel lymph node in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Oct;111(1):62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.05.032. Epub 2008 Jul 14. PubMed 18625518 ↗
  • Dick A, Perri T, Kogan L, Brandt B, Meyer R, Levin G. Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: A comparison of main national and international guidelines. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;160(1):220-225. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14307. Epub 2022 Jul 5. PubMed 35700068 ↗
  • Fotopoulou C, Ind T, Baldwin P, Crawford R, Devaja O, Dobbs S, Frost J, Gajjar K, Ganesan R, Kaushik S, Morrison J, Nobbenhuis M, Ratnavelu N, Rolland P, Singh N, Taylor A, Sundar S, Nordin A. Sentinel lymph node consensus document of the British Gynaecological Cancer Society for endometrial, vulvar, and cervical cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1348-1350. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000798. No abstract available. PubMed 31685556 ↗
  • Dioun S, Chen L, Melamed A, Gockley A, St Clair CM, Hou JY, Khoury-Collado F, Hershman DL, Wright JD. Uptake and outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping in women undergoing minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. BJOG. 2022 Aug;129(9):1591-1599. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17085. Epub 2022 Jan 25. PubMed 34962708 ↗
  • Baiocchi G, Andrade CEMC, Ribeiro R, Moretti-Marques R, Tsunoda AT, Alvarenga-Bezerra V, Lopes A, Costa RLR, Kumagai LY, Badiglian-Filho L, Faloppa CC, Mantoan H, De Brot L, Dos Reis R, Goncalves BT. Sentinel lymph node mapping versus sentinel lymph node mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial (ALICE trial). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 May 3;32(5):676-679. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003378. PubMed 35236752 ↗
  • Sozzi G, Fanfani F, Berretta R, Capozzi VA, Uccella S, Buono N, Giallombardo V, Di Donna MC, Monterossi G, Restaino S, Capasso I, Dinoi G, Scambia G, Chiantera V. Laparoscopic sentinel node mapping with intracervical indocyanine green injection for endometrial cancer: the SENTIFAIL study - a multicentric analysis of predictors of failed mapping. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1713-1718. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001724. Epub 2020 Aug 31. PubMed 32868384 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified IPD related to the primary and secondary outcomes will be shared upon reasonable request. Access will be granted for academic and scientific research purposes, subject to approval by the study investigators and compliance with ethical and regulatory guidelines. A data-sharing agreement will be required to ensure proper use and confidentiality of the data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07040657
Lead sponsor
Dokuz Eylul University
Responsible party
İbrahim Yalçın (Principal Investigator, Dokuz Eylul University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2025
Start date
May 1, 2025
Primary completion
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 27, 2025

Study contacts

Ibrahim Yalcin, MD
Contact
ibrahimyalcin73@gmail.com
+90 505 265 60 24
Ali Hakan Kula, MD
Contact
hkula95@gmail.com
+905358230685

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion