ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07036848Updated Jul 17, 2025

Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Treatment for Type IVa CBD

An observational study in Choledochal Cyst, sponsored by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged Up to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-17.

Sponsored by Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,500
Ages
Up to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a multicenter, bidirectional cohort study aimed at continuously enrolling patients with biliary dilatation from 25 medical centers in China. It will collect comprehensive life-cycle data from the cohort to establish a Chinese cohort for IVa biliary dilatation (BD). Based on this cohort, the study seeks to compare the perioperative risks, long-term outcomes, and quality of life of type IVa BD following surgical treatment, to establish standardized surgical treatment strategies for type IVa BD.

Read the detailed description

Biliary dilatation (BD) is a common complex benign biliary disease. The incidence rate in Asia is one of every 1000 individuals, and the incidence rate in Europe and America is about one of every 50,000-150,000 individuals. Type IVa BD was the most commonly intrahepatic BD and the second most commonly identifiable cyst type. According to the Todani classification of congenital type IVa represents a combination of intra-and extrahepatic cystic ectasias.

However, there is still significant controversy regarding the surgical treatment approaches for this disease. Current treatment methods mainly include hepaticojejunostomy and hepatectomy. On the one hand, studies suggest that performing hepaticojejunostomy while relieving hilar bile duct stricture is sufficient. Previous research has reported that intrahepatic bile duct cysts may regress after hepaticojejunostomy. However, recent studies have described that type IV-A bile duct (BD) patients may develop long-term complications such as intrahepatic bile duct stones, anastomotic stricture, and cholangitis after hepatojejunostomy, although the specific incidence rates remain unclear. On the other hand, only a few small-series studies have reported that hepatectomy may achieve satisfactory efficacy in treating intrahepatic BD. Nevertheless, other studies have shown that 30% of patients may develop postoperative intrahepatic bile duct stones. Considering that this procedure is a higher-risk surgery compared to bilioenteric anastomosis, its effectiveness and safety in the treatment of type IVa BD introduce greater uncertainty.

This study aims at enrolling patients with biliary dilatation from 25 medical centers in China. It will collect comprehensive life-cycle data from the cohort to establish a Chinese cohort for IVa BDs. Based on this cohort, the study seeks to compare the perioperative risks, long-term outcomes, and quality of life of type IVa BD following surgical treatment, to establish standardized surgical treatment strategies for type IVa BD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Choledochal Cyst

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Biliary Dilatation, Cohort Study, Surgical Treatment
03

In context

Choledochal Cyst

22 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledochal Cyst; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 400 across 14 observational studies indexed under Choledochal Cyst.

Browse Choledochal Cyst studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 56 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients with a definitive diagnosis of Todani type IVa biliary dilation in the participating centers

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who have been diagnosed with Todani type IVa BD.
  2. Patients aged between 0 and 80 years old, regardless of gender.
  3. First-time receipt of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. With abnormal intrapancreatic bile duct
  2. Inappropriate Roux-loop length (outside the range of 40-60 cm for adults and 15-30 cm for children)
  3. With non-relevant surgical interventions
  4. confirmed carcinogenesis
  5. Unresolved choledocholithiasis, bile duct stenosis, and Intrahepatic bile duct stones during the procedure.
  6. Unavailable follow-up information.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Liver Resection Group

    This group included patients with type IVa BD who underwent liver resection, extrahepatic bile duct resection and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy

  • Hepaticojejunostomy Group

    This group included patients with type IVa BD who underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Long-term complication-free survival (LCFS)

    For patients who have undergone surgical treatment, the occurrences of long-term postoperative complications include recurrent cholangitis, intrahepatic bile duct stones, stenosis of the bilioenteric anastomosis, and other such conditions

    Time frame: After 30 or 90 days of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall perioperative complication rate

    The occurrence of perioperative complications, including bile leakage, pancreatic leakage, liver failure, bacteremia, abdominal fluid accumulation, and intra-abdominal infections, among others

    Time frame: Within 30 or 90 days postoperatively

  2. Malignant transformation rate

    The occurrence of malignant transformation associated with bile duct dilatation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Mayo Score

    Long-term outcome was evaluated according to the dedicated clinical evaluation score reported by the Mayo Clinic: excellent, if the patient remained free of symptoms without further reintervention; good, if the patient had occasional and mild episodes of cholangitis or pancreatitis, which were not impairing the quality of life; fair, if the patient had repeated episodes of cholangitis or pancreatitis,or portal hypertension without further reintervention; poor, if the patient required later biliary or liver-related surgical procedures, developed biliary cirrhosis or complications because of portal hypertension, or died from cyst-related malignancy or liver and biliary-related complications.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  4. Severe perioperative complication rate

    The occurrence of severe perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥ III), including bile leakage, pancreatic leakage, liver failure, bacteremia, abdominal fluid accumulation, and intra-abdominal infections, among others.

    Time frame: Within 30 or 90 days postoperatively

  5. Reoperation rate

    The occurrence of reoperation after surgery

    Time frame: After 30 or 90 days of surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2025 to primary completion in Jul 2025, 0 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2025
First posted
Jun 25, 2025
StartActual
Jul 14, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jul 14, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2035
Last update
Jul 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07036848
Responsible party
Shuo Jin (Associate Chief Physician, Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2025
Start date
Jul 14, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 14, 2025
Completion
Jul 1, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2025

Study contacts

Changzhen Yang, MD
Contact
ycz23@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
+86 18810915262
Shuo Jin, PhD
Contact
jsa01263@btch.edu.cn
+86 18611172714
Shuo Jin, PhD
principal investigator · Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion