ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07031219Updated Oct 29, 2026

HIV/HBV/HCV Triple Screening in Primary Care

An interventional study of electronic medical record alert linked to orders in HIV, HBV (Hepatitis B Virus) and HCV, sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Updated Oct 29, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 197 studies in Hepatitis B with a site in United States — 15 open to participants now, 27 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Hepatitis B · United States.

Planned enrollment
91st of 148
50 · median 90
Started
2026
with 3 others
No phase
20 of 197
1 open now
Primary completion
2027-12
later than 16 of 25 live
Registered
193rd of 197
by date

Among the 197 studies in Hepatitis B with a site in United States, this one is the 91st largest by planned enrollment of the 148 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2026, is one of 20 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 16 of the 25 other live ones, and was the 193rd registered.

Hepatitis B

1,045 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis B; 139 are open to participants now.

Browse Hepatitis B studies →

Open to participants now

15 of the 197 studies in Hepatitis B with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

9 more — sign in →

All 15 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 79 Hepatitis B studies recruiting now, 40 (51%) set no upper age limit and 34 (43%) stop at 75 or younger; 13 take children under 18; 19 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 197 studies in Hepatitis B with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Design:

This will be a within-subjects repeated-measures design, testing an electronic medical record pop-up alert linked to order panels for screening blood tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Study participants will be primary care providers. For each participating provider, their encounter will be randomized to either control (no alert; no changes to EMR interface) or an alert with triple-testing order panel intervention arm (alert linked to order panel with screening tests for all three bloodborne viruses (BBVs) selected by default; the alert will be triggered when a provider attempts to order a screening test for at least one BBV). The alert linked to triple testing orders will only be triggered if the provider orders a virus BBV screening test based on their normal practice and standard of care for their patient. Providers will see which orders are selected prior to signing (finalizing) them; therefore, this study will be unblinded. To mitigate the effect of unblinding, randomization will occur at the encounter level which will lead to providers experiencing both the control and intervention conditions randomly throughout the duration of the study.

Outcomes/endpoints:

The investigators will compare incidences of HIV, HBV, and HCV diagnoses between the two encounter conditions, estimate number of cases missed by not triple-testing, estimate laboratory costs per condition, and measure patient encounters per condition.

03

Conditions studied

  • HIV
  • HBV (Hepatitis B Virus)
  • HCV

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • screening
  • provider orders
  • quality improvement
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatient primary care adult providers at participating institutions
  • Providers who provide consent to participate in this study.
  • Providers must intend to continue their current practice for at least 12 months.
  • Providers with at least 12 months experience in their current practice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Providers who do not consent to participate
  • Sub-specialty providers
  • Pediatric providers
  • Providers who anticipate leaving their current practice within the next 12 months (i.e. providers who plan to retire, move, etc.).
  • Providers with less than 12 months experience in their current practice (i.e. new providers or trainees who joined the practice within the last year)
  • Note: family medicine and med/peds providers can participate, but only for their adult patients. The intervention alert+order panel and any data collection will be restricted to adult patients ≥ 18 years old.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Randomized encounters

    For participating providers, each of their encounters will be randomized to either control (no alert; no changes to EMR interface; standard of care) or intervention (alert linked to triple testing orders will trigger when the provider attempts to order a screening test for HIV, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C). Since randomization will occur at the encounter level, participating providers will randomly experience control and intervention encounters throughout the duration of the study.

    Other: electronic medical record alert linked to orders

Interventions

  • Otherelectronic medical record alert linked to orders

    An electronic medical record alert linked to triple testing orders will be built specifically for this study. An order for a screening blood test for any of the three bloodborne viruses (BBVs; i.e. HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV)) will trigger an electronic medical record alert linked to orders for screening blood tests for all three BBVs to be selected by default. If participants accept the alert, the individual BBV order that triggered the alert will be replaced with the pre-selected screening orders for all three BBVs. If the participants dismiss the alert, the individual BBV screening test order that triggered the alert will be accepted without the addition of screening test orders for the other two BBVs. This alert with linked orders will only be available to participating providers throughout the duration of the study, and will only activate for encounters randomized to "intervention" encounters.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bloodborne virus (BBV) screening tests

    For total bloodborne virus (BBV) screening tests (HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) combined) and each individual BBV (HIV, HBV, or HCV independently), the investigators will measure the number of screening tests: 1) ordered, 2) performed, 3) with a positive result, 4) with a negative result: overall across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevalences of bloodborne viruses (BBVs)

    Prevalences of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) as well as BBV co-infections among patients of participating providers overall across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

  2. Incidences of bloodborne viruses (BBVs)

    Incidences of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) as well as BBV co-infections among patients of participating providers overall across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

  3. Number of patient encounters required to make a virus diagnosis and link patients to care

    Number of patient encounters required to make a virus diagnosis and link patients to care overall across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

  4. Cost efficiency analysis

    Assess and determine cost efficiency via analysis of laboratory costs by estimating laboratory costs per patient and per new diagnosis overall across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

  5. Repeated BBV tests

    Measure frequencies of repeated tests before and after excluding those with a known BBV diagnosis prior to the study across all encounters, and compared between control and intervention encounters as well as normalized to the providers' pre-study baseline

    Time frame: 24 months total: from 12 months pre-enrollment through the end of study participation (i.e. maximum of 1 year of participation)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 13 months later.

Of 62 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hepatitis B, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 68 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 47.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 29, 2026: start Jun 2026 → Nov 2026, primary completion Jun 2027 → Dec 2027 and completion Jun 2027 → Dec 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 12, 2025
First posted
Jun 22, 2025
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026was Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027was Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027was Jun 2027
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 29, 2026
Sites
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is now Recruiting
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
Oct 29, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2027→Dec 31, 2027
Oct 29, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2027→Dec 31, 2027
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center is now Recruiting
    Start date Jun 1, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
    Primary completion Jun 2027→Dec 31, 2027
    Study completion Jun 2027→Dec 31, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07031219
Collaborators
Gilead Sciences
Responsible party
Mamta K. Jain, MD,MPH (Professor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 22, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Nicole E Naiman, MD/PhD
Contact
nicole.naiman@utsouthwestern.edu
214-645-9317
Stephanie Reyes
Contact
Stephanie.Reyes@UTSouthwestern.edu
214-645-9317
Mamta K Jain, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion