ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07021755Updated Jun 15, 2025

Use Of Midazolam In Premedication Of Pediatric Patients

An interventional study of midazolam in Separation, Family and Separation Anxiety, sponsored by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-15.

Sponsored by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 15 years 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2009, registered Nov 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

: The aim of the study is to compare the effect of intranasal and oral midazolam administered for premedication to children of preschool age on hemodynamic parameters, sedation and separation from parents.

Read the detailed description

Patients meeting with anesthesiologists before surgery for assessment and administration of premedication is important in terms of reducing morbidity and mortality linked to surgery and anesthesia. A study reported that 75% of children experience anxiety before surgery. This anxiety and worry observed in the pediatric patient group may cause tachycardia, hypertension and tachypnea due to increased catecholamine levels in the body and may cause aggressive reactions that are difficult to control. Additionally, it may make control of postoperative pain more difficult .

Several drugs are used before anesthesia to resolve surgical anxiety in pediatric patients and facilitate problem-free transfer to the operating room.

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine group drug, commonly used for preoperative medication for a long time. Reasons for it being chosen for premedication are that it ensure sedation and anxiolysis, has rapid onset of effect, and is more amnesic than diazepam . Though there are many routes to administer the drug, IM and IV routes are painful and frightening for patients. The premedication administration route must be acceptable for the child and not be traumatic. As a result, generally oral and intranasal routes are chosen for sedation of pediatric patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intranasal and oral midazolam, administered for premedication to preschool children, on hemodynamic parameters, sedation level and separation from parents, and in terms of complications.

The study was planned as prospective, randomized and single-blind research. After receiving permission from the ethics committee of our hospital (Haseki Clinical Research Ethics Committee No: 28.05.2009/10), the study included a total of 60 children aged 2-6 years in ASA ( Physical Status Classification System) I-II group, with elective surgery planned under general anesthetic. . Patients were allocated to two equal groups with the closed envelope method (Group O, n=30, 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam; Group N, n=30, 0.25 mg/kg intranasal midazolam). Midazolam was administered 20 minutes before the operation. Vital signs and sedation score levels were recorded every 5 minutes. At the end of the 20th minute, the separation from parents score was assessed and recorded. Assessments were completed by an anesthesiologist who did not know the method of administration for premedication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Separation, Family
  • Separation Anxiety

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • midazolam
  • premedication
  • children
03

In context

Anxiety, Separation

59 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety, Separation; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 68 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety, Separation.

Browse Anxiety, Separation studies →

Lead sponsor

Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Children 2-6 years old

  • group
  • with elective surgery planned under general anesthetic.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients allergic to midazolam
  • rhinorrhea
  • respiratory system dysfunction like nasal polyp
  • neurological or psychiatric disorder
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    intranasal midazolam

    Twenty minutes before anesthesia induction, the first group were given 0.25 mg/kg intranasal midazolam and named Group N (n=30). Intranasal midazolam was administered by the parent with a 2 ml injector with the needle removed, with half the dose given into one nostril and the other half into the other nostril, while the patient was lying supine.

    Other: midazolam

  • Experimental
    oral midazolam

    The second group were given 0.5 mg/kg oral midazolam and called Group O (n=30). Patients given oral midazolam drank the calculated midazolam dose mixed with 5 ml pulp-free fruit juice.

    Other: midazolam

Interventions

  • Othermidazolam
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. sedation

    The level of sedation was monitored every 5 minutes with the Ramsey sedation scale. Sedation scores of 1 and 2 were inadequate, while sedation scores of 3 and 4 were accepted as satisfactory

    Time frame: five minute

Secondary outcomes

  1. separation from parents

    Twenty minutes later, separation from parents was assessed with a four-stage scale and recorded. For separation from parents, scores of 1 and 2 were satisfactory and scores of 3 and 4 were inadequate

    Time frame: twenty minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Haseki training and research hospital
    Istanbul, Fatih 34668, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07021755
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 15, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2009
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2009
Completion
Dec 1, 2009
Last update
Jun 15, 2025

Study contacts

Ecder Ozenc
study director · ozencecder@hotmail.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion