CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07016295MARSUpdated Aug 11, 2025

Monitoring Arm Recovery After Stroke (MARS)

An observational study in Stroke, sponsored by King's College London. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by King's College London · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

People who have a stroke often find it hard to do the things they did before. This can be caused by problems with arm movement. One in five people do not get any arm movement back after a stroke.

Arm movements can be measured accurately in a laboratory, but it is very expensive and not easy to do in hospital. That means it is hard to tell if the arm is recovering to move like it did before the stroke or adapting to perform tasks in other ways.

To tell if a treatment is working, the investigators are making a phone app to record arm movement, using the camera. The recordings will be turned into data showing movement difficulties and sent to hospital records for clinicians. Clinicians will see if movement changes, to help choose the best treatment.

The investigators are looking for twelve stroke survivors to help test this app.

  • The session will be at King's College London, on Guy's Campus.
  • It will run for 2-3 hours.
  • Participants will wear a vest or tight-fitting clothes.
  • The investigators will place non-invasive markers on the participants arm.
  • The investigators will video simple movements such as drinking from a cup.
  • The investigators will also measure the same simple movements using the laboratory cameras.

This will show us if our app can measure arm movement as well as laboratory tests. If they do, the investigators will know the app is accurate.

In future this technology can improve recovery by correcting stroke survivors when they perform home exercises.

Read the detailed description

Upper limb recovery after stroke remains poor and 20% of stroke survivors do not recover arm movement. To improve outcome and advance insights to recovery mechanisms, an international collaboration has proposed a standardised set of outcome measures, including movement kinematics. Kinematics are moresensitive to change than clinical measures and can differentiate whether recovery is achieved by compensating to impairment or true recovery. However, kinematic assessments are not performed in clinical practice as 3-D motion capture requires expensive equipment and expertise for set-up and analysis.

The investigators therefore aim to develop a low-cost tool to measure kinematics. Open-source Artificial Intelligence models can detect positions and orientations on video and are called pose estimation models. The objectives will be to deploy and test these models in stroke survivors. The investigators will invite 12 stroke survivors with mild to moderate upper limb impairment and compare the accuracy of the models to gold-standard kinematic analysis when performing a variety of upper limb tasks. The investigators will optimise the models in case of any discrepancies. The investigators will develop a front-end smartphone app to instruct, record and provide feedback of arm movement performance to clinicians and stroke survivors. The investigators will develop the software back-end performing analysis of recorded movements and integrating these findings into electronic healthcare records for longitudinal performance tracking.

This accessible technology will provide clinicians kinematic analyses. Kinematics can guide treatment modifications and progression to improve upper limb movement.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • biomechanics
  • pose estimation models
  • upper limb
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 160 across 1,692 observational studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 506 studies on the registry; 125 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

18 stroke survivors 8 Healthy age-matched controls

Stroke survivors

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of stroke
  • Arm impairment evidenced by Fugl-Meyer Upper Limb Assessment between 9-60/66.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing ability to consent to treatment and understand and follow research protocol
  • Severe language deficit preventing ability to consent to treatment and understand and follow research protocol
  • Shoulder pain >3/10 on visual analog scale
  • Unable to maintain independent sitting balance without a high back support.
  • Wheelchair users that are unable to transfer with assistance of 1 to lab chair or whose wheelchair backrest cannot colapse.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Stroke survivors

    Behavioral: Biomechanical analysis of arm movement · Behavioral: Pose estimation of arm movement

  • Healthy age-matched controls

    Behavioral: Biomechanical analysis of arm movement · Behavioral: Pose estimation of arm movement

Interventions

  • BehavioralBiomechanical analysis of arm movement

    Marker based kinematic analysis

  • BehavioralPose estimation of arm movement

    Marker free kinematic analysis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pose estimation model accuracy

    Agreement between pose estimation and biomechanics measurements

    Time frame: During intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Upper limb Assessment

    Time frame: baseline, before intervention

  2. Motricity Index

    Strength

    Time frame: baseline, before intervention

  3. Cancellation OCS

    neglect

    Time frame: baseline, before intervention

  4. Box and block

    dexterity

    Time frame: during the intervention

  5. ARAT-2

    Time frame: during the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences
    London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
    • Ulrike Hammerbeck, PhD · Contact · ulrike.hammerbeck@kcl.ac.uk · +44 (0) 207 848 888 x6292
    • Irene di Giulio, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Letizia Gionfrida, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The main data includes videos of participants which are impossible to anonymise. Therefore it is not appropriate for sharing.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07016295
Lead sponsor
King's College London
Collaborators
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2025
Start date
Jul 28, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Study contacts

Ulrike Hammerbeck, PhD
Contact
ulrike.hammerbeck@kcl.ac.uk
+44 (0) 20 7888 6292
Vasa Curcin, PhD
study chair · King's College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion