CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07014722CAS-2Updated Sep 16, 2026

Contact Activation of Coagulation in Newly Inserted Central Venous Catheters

An interventional study of MERITMEDICAL Careflow™ Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter and ARROW Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter in Central Venous Catheter, Coagulation and Coagulation Activation, sponsored by Thomas Kander. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Thomas Kander · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
88
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A central venous catheter (CVC) is a thin plastic tube placed into one of the body's large veins, typically in the neck or near the clavicle. CVCs are crucial for administering medications, fluids, and secure blood samples. Although CVCs are an essential tool in healthcare, there are certain risks and complications associated with their use. CVCs can affect the body's coagulation system, potentially leading to the formation of blood clots at the site of the catheter. This can result in serious complications, and in some cases, increased morbidity and mortality. Despite the known risk of blood clot formation with catheter use, it is still do not fully understand why clots occur or how a newly inserted catheter affects the coagulation system.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare four different central venous catheters and their impact on the coagulation system.

Eighty eight patients ≥18 years of age, who require a CVC and agree to participate in the study will be randomly assigned to one of the four predetermined, commonly used, central venous catheters. Two blood samples will be taken from the newly inserted catheter. The first blood sample (Sample 1) will be collected within seconds after catheter insertion without pre-flushing the catheter with saline. The second blood sample (Sample 2) will be taken after the catheter has been flushed with at least 10 ml saline and the initial blood discarded. All samples will be taken from the distale lumen without any connectors. Samples 1 and 2 will then be analyzed to measure how the coagulation system is affected after contact with the inside surface of the CVC. The blood samples will also be compared between the different catheter types and in overall cohort irrespective of group .

The study could provide valuable information on how the coagulation system is affected after catheter insertion. This knowledge could help improve preventive measures to reduce the risk of blood clot formation and ensure safer blood sampling for patients with venous catheters.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial, designed to evaluate coagulation activation in response to four different commercially available central venous catheters (CVCs), all with similar internal surface areas. The study focuses on comparing changes in coagulation parameters, primarily clotting time (CT), measured using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM® NATEM), as well as additional ROTEM variables and standard coagulation markers.

Participants are included based on clinical need for central venous access, and are randomized using REDCap to receive one of four CVC types:

  1. MERITMEDICAL Careflow™ Two-Lumen Catheter (7 Fr, 150 mm, polyurethane, OD 2.4 mm)
  2. ARROW Two-Lumen Catheter (7 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane, OD 2.5 mm)
  3. ARROWg+ard Blue Plus® Two-Lumen Catheter (8 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane, OD 2.8 mm, chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine coating)
  4. Multicath 2 Expert UP Two-Lumen Catheter (7.5 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane shaft embedded with silver ions, OD 2.5 mm)

Blood samples will be collected at two time points for each participant:

  • Sample 1: Immediately after catheter insertion, before flushing
  • Sample 2: After at least 10 ml saline flush and discard protocol

All catheters will be inserted without pre-procedural filling with saline.

Blood will be collected into Vacuette® CTAD tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) containing sodium citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole, designed for hemostatic testing. The tubes will be inverted eight times immediately after blood collection and kept at 37°C until processing. ROTEM® analysis will be performed within 3 hours of blood collection. After the ROTEM® analysis, the remaining blood will undergo centrifugation at 4000g for 15 minutes, and 600-700 µL of plasma from each sample will be transferred into cryotubes, which will be immediately frozen and stored at -80°C for further analysis.

Laboratory and ROTEM® Analyses

ROTEM® analyses will be performed on whole blood using recalcified non-activated thromboelastometry (NATEM), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Each test will be run for 60 minutes, measuring the following variables:

Clotting Time (CT) - time to initial fibrin formation Clot Formation Time (CFT) - speed of thrombus development Alpha Angle (α-angle) - kinetics of clot formation Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF) - measure of final clot strength

Routine Plasma-Based Coagulation Assays:

Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)

The following coagulation markers will also be assessed:

Factor VII (FVII) and Factor XII (FXII) Thrombin-Antithrombin Complex (TAT)

02

Conditions studied

  • Central Venous Catheter
  • Coagulation
  • Coagulation Activation
  • Central Venous Catheter Complications

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • coagulation
  • ROTEM
  • central venous catheter
03

In context

Thrombosis

1,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Thrombosis; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is below the median of 106 across 849 interventional studies indexed under Thrombosis.

Browse Thrombosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Kander is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria to be included in the study:

  1. Clinical indication for the placement of a two-lumen central venous catheter with length 150-160 mm.
  2. Age ≥18 years.
  3. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:

  1. Current use of anticoagulants or platelet inhibitors, except: Prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), double prophylactic dose of LMWH, Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA).
  2. Prothrombin complex (pK/INR) outside the normal range (0.9-1.2), platelet count \<50 × 10⁹/L or haemoglobin \< 80 g/L, if already available.
  3. Known coagulopathic conditions, including but not limited to:

    • Activated protein C (APC) resistance,
    • Hemophilia A or B,
    • Vitamin K deficiency,
    • Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC),
    • Antiphospholipid syndrome,
    • von Willebrand disease, Other known congenital or acquired bleeding disorders.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group A: MERITMEDICAL Careflow™

    Participants will receive a MERITMEDICAL Careflow™ two-lumen 7 Fr, 150 mm, polyurethane central venous catheter (OD 2.4 mm).

    Device: MERITMEDICAL Careflow™ Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Group B: ARROW

    Participants will receive an ARROW two-lumen 7 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane central venous catheter (OD 2.5 mm).

    Device: ARROW Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Group C: ARROWg+ard Blue Plus®

    Participants will receive an ARROWg+ard Blue Plus® two-lumen 8 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane catheter (OD 2.8 mm) with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coating.

    Device: ARROWg+ard Blue Plus® Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

  • Active comparator
    Group D: Multicath 2 Expert UP

    Participants will receive a Multicath 2 Expert UP two-lumen 7.5 Fr, 160 mm, polyurethane shaft embedded with silver ions (OD 2.5 mm).

    Device: Multicath 2 Expert UP Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceMERITMEDICAL Careflow™ Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

    7 Fr, 150 mm, radio-opaque polyurethane catheter (OD 2.4 mm)

  • DeviceARROW Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

    7 Fr, 160 mm, radio-opaque polyurethane catheter (OD 2.5 mm)

  • DeviceARROWg+ard Blue Plus® Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

    8 Fr, 160 mm, radio-opaque polyurethane catheter with antimicrobial coating

  • DeviceMulticath 2 Expert UP Two-Lumen Central Venous Catheter

    7.5 Fr, 160 mm, central venous catheter (OD 2.5 mm). Polyurethane shaft embedded with silver ions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in ROTEM NATEM Clotting Time (CT) (seconds) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    The primary endpoint is the difference in clotting time (CT), measured using ROTEM NATEM, between two blood samples collected from each participant. Sample 1 is collected immediately after catheter insertion, and Sample 2 is collected after a standardized flush and discard procedure. The change in CT will be compared across the four catheter groups to evaluate differences in coagulation activation.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in ROTEM NATEM CT between Sample 1 and Sample 2: within-group and overall cohort comparisons.

    Change in ROTEM NATEM CT between Sample 1 and Sample 2: within-group and overall cohort comparisons.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  2. Change in ROTEM NATEM Clot Formation Time (CFT) (seconds) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in ROTEM NATEM Clot Formation Time (ΔCFT) (seconds) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of CFT and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  3. Change in ROTEM Alpha Angle (α-angle) (degrees) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in ROTEM NATEM Alpha Angle (Δα-angle, degrees) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of α-angle and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  4. Change in ROTEM Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF) (mm) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in ROTEM NATEM Maximum Clot Firmness (MCF) (mm) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of MCF and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  5. Change in Prothrombin Time - International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) (continous unitless variable) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in Prothrombin Time - International Normalized Ratio (PT-INR) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of PT-INR and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  6. Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) (seconds) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) (seconds) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of aPTT and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  7. Change in Factor VII Activity (FVII) (kIU/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in Factor VII Activity (FVII) (kIU/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of FVII and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  8. Change in Factor XII Activity (FXII) (kIU/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in Factor XII Activity (FXII) (kIU/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of FXII and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Time Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

  9. Change in Thrombin-Antithrombin Complex Concentration (TAT) (mikrogr/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2

    Between-group comparison of the change in Thrombin-Antithrombin Complex Concentration (TAT) (mikrogr/L) between Sample 1 and Sample 2, with within-group comparisons of TAT and an overall cohort comparison of Sample 1 versus Sample 2.

    Time frame: Immediately after catheter insertion (Sample 1) and after flush and discard, within one hour (Sample 2)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Skåne University Hospital Lund
    Lund, Skåne County 22242, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zorlak A, Naddi L, Borgquist O, Kander T. Contact activation of coagulation in newly inserted central venous catheters (CAS-2): protocol for a randomised controlled study comparing four commercially available catheters. BMJ Open. 2026 Jun 28;16(6):e119213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-119213. PubMed 42366009 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 3, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the study results will be made available upon reasonable request. Data will be completely anonymized prior to sharing, in accordance with applicable data protection regulations. Requests from both academic researchers and commercial entities (e.g., device manufacturers) will be considered. All requests will undergo review to assess scientific validity and compliance with ethical standards.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07014722
Lead sponsor
Thomas Kander
Collaborators
Lund University
Responsible party
Thomas Kander (Professor, Region Skane) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2025
Start date
Sep 10, 2025
Primary completion
May 15, 2026
Completion
Aug 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion