CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07008846Updated Jun 6, 2025

Efficacy of Tofacitinib, Methotrexate Combination Therapy Versus Upadacitinib, Methotrexate Combination Therapy in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 interventional study of To see the efficacy of Upadacitinib, Methotrexate versus Tofacitinib, Methotrexate in moderate to severe Rheumatoid arthritis in Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-06.

Sponsored by Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh · Phase 3, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of upadacitinib, methotrexate combination therapy in comparison to tofacitinib, methotrexate combination therapy in moderate to severe RA patients. This study will guide us to treat RA patients with inadequate response to methotrexate more effectively

02

Conditions studied

  • Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is close to the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 24 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 1.Patients of both gender (age ≥18 years). 2.Patients fulfill the ACR/EULAR 2010 classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis.

3.Patients with DAS-28 CRP >3.2 despite optimum dose and duration of methotrexate (20-25 mg/week for minimum one month).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1.Recent or concurrent infection

    2.Active or latent tuberculosis

    1. Hemoglobin (Hb) \< 8 g/dl 4. White blood cell count \< 4000/ micro L, Neutrophil count \< 1000/ micro L, Platelet count \< 100000/mm3 5. Live vaccines (rota virus, varicella, yellow fever) within 3 months prior to the first dose 6. Child-Pugh Class -C 7. Pregnant or planned for pregnancy and breastfeeding females of child-bearing potential 8. Evidence or history of malignancy, with the exception of adequately treated or excised non-metastatic basal or squamous cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ 9. New York Heart Association Class III and IV congestive heart failure 10. Previous history of thromboembolism, deep venous thrombosis, stroke, IHD
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Efficacy of upadacitinib, methotrexate combination therapy versus tofacitinib, methotrexate combinat

    Drug: To see the efficacy of Upadacitinib, Methotrexate versus Tofacitinib, Methotrexate in moderate to severe Rheumatoid arthritis

Interventions

  • DrugTo see the efficacy of Upadacitinib, Methotrexate versus Tofacitinib, Methotrexate in moderate to severe Rheumatoid arthritis

    This intervention is open label. Both patient and investigator will know about the intervention. Participants are allocated according to block randomization. Total two groups with each contain 48 patients. One group will be given Tofacitinib, Methotrexate and another group will be given Upadacitinib, Methotrexate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DAS28-CRP

    Number of Participants with Low disease activity or Remission as Assessed by DAS28-CRP, Change from Baseline in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at 24Weeks).

    Time frame: Outcome 1:"Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 4" Outcome 2:"Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 12" Outcome 3:"Disease Activity Score 28 CRP (DAS28-CRP) at week 24"

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
    Dhaka, Shahbag 1000, Bangladesh
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07008846
Lead sponsor
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Responsible party
Md Anisul Islam (Director, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2025
Start date
May 10, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion