ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07005258CANDIDIAGUpdated Jun 5, 2025

Diagnostic Performance of the CandID PLUS PCR for the Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients

An observational study in Intra-Abdominal Infection, Candida and Peritonitis Infectious, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-05.

Primary conditionPeritonitisRegistry: Intraabdominal InfectionsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Intraabdominal Infections — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Peritonitis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Peritonitis, a narrower term within Intraabdominal Infections.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Invasive candidiasis are the most common form of fungal infection in critically ill patients, particularly intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The current diagnostic gold standard relies on conventional fungal culture, which has a long turnaround time and may delay targeted antifungal therapy. Non-culture-based assays such as 1,3-β-D-glucan lack specificity for early and definitive diagnosis. Molecular diagnostics, including PCR, offer faster and more specific detection, but their clinical use remains limited.

The CandID PLUS PCR assay targets major Candida species and has not yet been evaluated on peritoneal fluid.

The CANDIDIAG study aims to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR in detecting Candida spp. in peritoneal fluid from ICU patients with suspected IAC.

This study constitutes a post-hoc analysis of the pBDG2 study (Prospective evaluation of the peritoneal 1.3 Beta-D-glucan for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal candidiasis in the critically ill patients) registered with the number NCT 03997929). Therefore, all patients have been already recruited. For the CANDIDIAG study, we will use the biological collection of peritoneal fluid issue from the pBDG2 study. All patients with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis are identified. We will test de CandID PCR, retrospectively, on their peritoneal fluid and compared the results with the fungal culture.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intra-Abdominal Infection
  • Candida
  • Peritonitis Infectious
  • Molecular Diagnostic
  • Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intra-abdominal candidiasis
  • secondary peritonitis
  • candida
  • PCR
  • molecular diagnostic
03

In context

Peritonitis Reclassified

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 88 is below the median of 137 across 55 observational studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 186 are open to participants now.

Compared within Peritonitis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Intraabdominal Infections. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The pBDG2 study enrolled 199 ICU patients across four participating centers. Inclusion criteria were: adult ICU patients with suspected intra-abdominal infection likely due to Candida spp., requiring emergency abdominal surgery.

Among the enrolled patients, 88 were diagnosed with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis based on positive fungal culture.

Only these 88 patients will be eligible for inclusion in the CANDIDIAG study. This constitutes a post-hoc analysis of a predefined subpopulation from the pBDG2 cohort.

Participating centers included the University Hospitals of Nancy, Dijon, Strasbourg, and the Regional Hospital Center of Metz (CHR Metz)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult critically ill patient
  • with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis (culture positive with Candida albicans, glabrata, parapsilosis, tropicalis, krusei, and dubliniensis)
  • enrolled in the pBDG2 study (NCT 03997929)
  • intra-abdominal candidiasis documented at

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declined to participate
  • intra-abdominal candidiasis caused by other candida species
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
88 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Critically ill patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis requiring abdominal surgery

    All patients have confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis (positive Candida culture)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR for the detection of Candida albicans, glabrata, parapsilosis, tropicalis, krusei, and dubliniensis in peritoneal fluid of ICU patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the CandID PLUS PCR, using fungal culture as the reference standard.

    Time frame: Day of the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the diagnostic performance of the CandID PLUS PCR with that of peritoneal 1,3-β-D-glucan

    Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of peritoneal 1,3-β-D-glucan compared with fungal culture; diagnostic performance comparison between CandID PLUS PCR and 1,3-β-D-glucan (including ROC curve analysis)

    Time frame: Day of the surgery

  2. To explore the association between PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values (as a proxy for fungal load) and clinical parameters, including SOFA score and ICU mortality

    Association between PCR Ct values and clinical severity (SOFA score) and ICU mortality

    Time frame: Day 1 (surgery) to Day 28

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Université de Lorraine - CHRU de Nancy
    Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, Lorraine 54500, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07005258
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2025
Start date
Apr 17, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 17, 2025
Completion
Apr 17, 2025
Last update
Jun 5, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion