ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07003412Updated Sep 10, 2026

PULSE PVC Registry: Multicenter Study on Focal Pulsed Field Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions

An observational study in Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) and Pulsed Field Ablation, sponsored by Zentralklinik Bad Berka. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Zentralklinik Bad Berka · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The PULSE PVC Registry is a European multicenter observational study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of focal pulsed field ablation (PFA) using the Centauri Generator system in patients with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The registry collects standardized procedural and follow-up data across diverse PVC origins, enabling comparisons with historical radiofrequency (RF) ablation outcomes. Data will include baseline characteristics, procedural details, complications, and long-term PVC burden reduction. Each center will obtain local ethics approval, and only anonymized data will be analyzed.

Read the detailed description

The PULSE PVC Registry is a European multicenter observational registry designed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and midterm outcomes of focal pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the treatment of symptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The study includes patients undergoing focal PFA using a monopolar biphasic energy system (Centauri Generator), across multiple high-volume electrophysiology centers in Europe.

The registry collects detailed baseline demographics, comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease), structural heart disease status, antiarrhythmic drug use, prior ablation history, and baseline PVC burden. Procedural characteristics include PVC mapping approach, pharmacologic testing (e.g., isoproterenol, nitroglycerin), number and type of ablation applications (PFA and/or RF), use of coronary angiography, venous system access (GCV/AIV), and fluoroscopy metrics.

Outcomes assessed include:

Primary outcome: Midterm clinical success, defined as a reduction in PVC burden to \<5% on follow-up (via Holter monitoring)

Secondary outcomes: Acute procedural success, complication rates (e.g., coronary vasospasm, conduction disturbances, stroke, vascular complications), and recurrence patterns.

Patients are stratified based on the site of origin of PVCs (e.g., RVOT subregions, LVOT, aortic cusps, papillary muscles).

Follow-up includes symptom assessment, PVC burden, antiarrhythmic drug use, and mode of follow-up (telephone or in-person). The registry provides a comprehensive overview of clinical outcomes with focal PFA and enables comparison with historical radiofrequency ablation data.

This registry aims to generate robust real-world evidence to inform procedural strategy, patient selection, and safety considerations in PVC ablation using pulsed field energy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC)
  • Pulsed Field Ablation
03

In context

Ventricular Premature Complexes

102 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Premature Complexes; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 125 across 39 observational studies indexed under Ventricular Premature Complexes.

Browse Ventricular Premature Complexes studies →

Lead sponsor

Zentralklinik Bad Berka is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

he study population consists of adult patients (age ≥18 years) with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions undergoing focal monopolar biphasic pulsed field ablation. All patients included must have been treated with the Centauri Generator system and have a minimum of 3 months of follow-up data available at the time of registry entry. The population is expected to be heterogeneous, including patients with and without structural heart disease, and PVCs originating from various anatomical sites. Patients will be enrolled across multiple European electrophysiology centers with varying procedural practices, enhancing the generalizability of the findings.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with symptomatic PVCs who underwent focal monopolar biphasic PFA
  • Use of Centauri Generator system
  • Minimum 3-month clinical follow-up at time of data entry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete procedural or follow-up data
  • Patients receiving exclusively RF ablation
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom from clinically significant PVCs at 6-month follow-up

    Clinically significant PVCs are defined as a PVC burden ≥5% on 24-hour Holter ECG. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve a reduction in PVC burden to \<5% at 6 months following pulsed field ablation (PFA). PVC burden will be quantified using standardized 24-hour Holter recordings. Patients must not be on any new antiarrhythmic medication during this period to be considered a true efficacy responder.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute Procedural Success

    Acute procedural success is defined as complete elimination of the targeted PVC morphology by the end of the ablation procedure, confirmed by the absence of spontaneous or inducible PVCs following programmed stimulation and/or isoproterenol challenge. Early PVC burden reduction is assessed via telemetry and 24-hour Holter monitoring performed during hospitalization. ≥80% reduction in PVC burden during the first 48 hours post-ablation is considered an early indicator of treatment efficacy.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 2 (during hospital stay)

  2. Periprocedural Complication Rate

    Procedure-related complications occurring during the hospital stay will be systematically recorded from the end of the procedure until discharge (typically Day 0 to Day 2). These include vascular complications (e.g., access-site hematoma, iliac artery dissection), conduction disturbances (e.g., transient or persistent right bundle branch block), coronary vasospasm, and cerebrovascular events.

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 2 (hospital stay)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zentralklinik Bad Berka
    Bad Berka, Thuringia, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The decision regarding IPD sharing is currently under review and will depend on institutional policies, ethical approvals.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07003412
Lead sponsor
Zentralklinik Bad Berka
Responsible party
Ahmad Keelani (Principal Investigator, Zentralklinik Bad Berka) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2026
Completion
Sep 1, 2026
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

J. Christoph Geller, Prof. Dr.
study director · Zentralklinikum Bad berka
Santi Raffa, Dr.
study director · Zentralklinik Bad Berka

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion