ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06998290Blue-LineUpdated May 31, 2025

Feasibility of Home Telemonitoring of Infants With Congenital Heart Disease Awaiting Surgery During the First Year of Life

An interventional study of Blue-Line home telemonitoring program in CHD - Congenital Heart Disease, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 0 Months to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-31.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
0 Months to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Actually, there is no telemonitoring program that includes newborns or infants with congenital heart disease awaiting cardiac intervention. This is a vulnerable period, prone to clinical complications, rehospitalization, parental stress, and requires monitoring with clinical and therapeutic optimization. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of monitoring newborns and infants with congenital heart disease awaiting cardiac surgery using the Blue-Line home telemonitoring program.

Read the detailed description

Today, congenital heart disease affects around 0.8% of births in France. One third of children diagnosed antenatally or postnatally with congenital heart disease will require surgical or percutaneous intervention within the first year of life. Actually, there is no telemonitoring program that includes newborns or infants with congenital heart disease awaiting cardiac intervention. This is a vulnerable period, prone to clinical complications, rehospitalization, parental stress, and requires monitoring with clinical and therapeutic optimization. Our research team at the M3C Network Reference Center aims to develop home telemonitoring for these patients, in order to innovate and optimize their care pathway.

02

Conditions studied

  • CHD - Congenital Heart Disease

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Infants
  • Vulnerability
  • Home monitoring
  • Therapeutic education
  • Digital platform
03

In context

Heart Defects, Congenital

1,031 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital; 262 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 531 interventional studies indexed under Heart Defects, Congenital.

Browse Heart Defects, Congenital studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 803 studies on the registry; 194 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Months to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Newborns and/or infants aged 0 to 12 months inclusive at the time of diagnosis.
  • With congenital heart disease as defined in the ICD-11 classification.
  • Waiting for an intervention by cardiac surgery or interventional catheterization.
  • Free, informed consent signed by the holder(s) of parental authority.
  • Person affiliated to or benefiting from a social security scheme.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Short-term vital prognosis
  • Clinical situation identified at the M3C RCP that contraindicates a return home
  • Family situation identified at the M3C RCP as contra-indicating a return home
  • Extra-cardiac co-morbidities requiring hospitalisation independent of the heart disease (e.g. severe renal failure, neurological deficit, complex immune deficiency, etc.).
  • Limited understanding of parental authority holder(s) / caregivers (non-French speaking, hearing impaired, cognitive impairment or other)
  • Parents unable to give informed consent.
  • Minors with parental authority
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Blue-Line programme

    Telemonitoring program

    Other: Blue-Line home telemonitoring program

Interventions

  • OtherBlue-Line home telemonitoring program

    * A dedicated telemonitoring team with nurses and pediatric cardiologist * A dedicated therapeutic patient education programme * A home telemonitoring medical device with a dedicated platform

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of the implementation of the patient therapeutic education programme: number of validated workshops out of number of workshops offered

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  2. Evaluation of the measurement devices: functional (yes/no)

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  3. Evaluation of the telemonitoring platform (functional/ergonomic/reliable)

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  4. Recruitment rate: number of participants out of number of eligible patients

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  5. Adherence to the telemonitoring programme: number of the participants who finish the programm out of number of patients included

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  6. Acceptability to parents: parent satisfaction questionnaire

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

  7. Acceptability to caregivers: caregiver satisfaction questionnaire

    Contributes to programme feasibility criteria

    Time frame: between inclusion visit and the last protocol visit (month 12)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Events of interest

    Events of interest are defined as any event leading to discontinuation of remote monitoring and/or unscheduled hospitalisation.

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  2. Date of telemonitoring alert

    Contributes to the alert performance criteria

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  3. Severity level of alert (orange/red)

    Contributes to the alert performance criteria

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  4. Appropriateness of the alert (yes/no)

    Contributes to the alert performance criteria

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  5. Respect for the procedure to be followed following an alert by parents (yes/no)

    Contributes to the alert performance criteria

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  6. Appropriateness of medical management following the alert given the clinical situation (yes/no)

    Contributes to the alert performance criteria

    Time frame: between months 3 and 12

  7. Evolution of the height (cm)

    Contributes to the clinical evolution criteria

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

  8. Evolution of the weight (kg)

    Contributes to the clinical evolution criteria

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

  9. Evolution of oxygen saturation (SpO2, %)

    Contributes to the clinical evolution criteria

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

  10. Evolution of the heart failure score (Ross classification)

    Contributes to the clinical evolution criteria

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

  11. Life quality

    Changes in the score of the QUALIN (QUALIté de vie du Nourrisson) validated generic quality of life proxy questionnaire: before returning home, at 3 months and at the end of the programme. The QUALIN questionnaire is a 34-item generic French QoL instrument designed for infants (aged 0-3 years). Each answer scores from -2 (totally false) to +2 (quite true). An item with a score \>1 corresponds to favourable QoL.

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

  12. Parental anxiety

    Changes in the score of the STAI (State-Trait Anwiety Inventory) parental anxiety questionnaire: state-trait anxiety inventory. The STAI questionnaire is a 40-item instrument designed for adults. Each answer score from 1 to 4. The higher the score, the less anxious the patient.

    Time frame: between months 2 and 12

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
    Montpellier, France 34295 - Cedex 5, France
  • CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique Haut Lévêque
    Pessac, France 33604, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06998290
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 31, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2025

Study contacts

Mélissa DACCORD
Contact
melissa.daccord@chu-bordeaux.fr
+33 5 24 54 91 68 ext. +33
Julie CHABANEIX, MD
Contact
julie.thomas@chu-bordeaux.fr
+33 5 57 65 61 09 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion