ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06998212Updated May 31, 2025

The Effect of Smartphone-Based Recording Offer on Patient Satisfaction in Orthopedic Care

An interventional study of Offer to record encounter in Patient Satisfaction, sponsored by Blake Han. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-31.

Sponsored by Blake Han · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
972
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine patient satisfaction with orthopedic preoperative encounter based on offer to record the encounter on patient personal smartphone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patient Satisfaction

Keywords

  • Satisfaction
  • Smartphone
  • Recording
  • Record
  • Preop
  • Preoperative
  • Orthopedic
03

In context

Patient Satisfaction

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Patient Satisfaction; 202 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 972 is above the median of 96 across 624 interventional studies indexed under Patient Satisfaction.

Browse Patient Satisfaction studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Blake Han as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients presenting to RUHS for preoperative orthopedic evaluation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without smartphones
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
972 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Offer to record the encounter on patient smartphone

    Behavioral: Offer to record encounter

  • No intervention
    No offer to record the encounter on patient smartphone

Interventions

  • BehavioralOffer to record encounter

    Patient will be given the option to record their clinical encounter on their personal smartphone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction with preoperative orthopedic encounter

    Measured via survey response

    Time frame: From enrollment to survey completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient survey responses including if patient recorded visit, reason for recording visit, preference for recording visit

    Survey Responses

    Time frame: From enrollment to survey completion

  2. If satisfaction varies by demographic factors (age, race, ethnicity, sex) or by type of procedure that the preop is for

    Information will be collected from chart review

    Time frame: Through study completion, average 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Norgaard B, Kofoed PE, Ohm Kyvik K, Ammentorp J. Communication skills training for health care professionals improves the adult orthopaedic patient's experience of quality of care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):698-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00982.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16. PubMed 22420418 ↗
  • Meakin R, Weinman J. The 'Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale' (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract. 2002 Jun;19(3):257-63. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.257. PubMed 11978716 ↗
  • Koh TH, Butow PN, Coory M, Budge D, Collie LA, Whitehall J, Tattersall MH. Provision of taped conversations with neonatologists to mothers of babies in intensive care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007 Jan 6;334(7583):28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39017.675648.BE. Epub 2006 Dec 1. PubMed 17142256 ↗
  • Wolderslund M, Kofoed PE, Holst R, Axboe M, Ammentorp J. Digital audio recordings improve the outcomes of patient consultations: A randomised cluster trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Aug 29. PubMed 27593087 ↗
  • Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW. Patients recording clinical encounters: a path to empowerment? Assessment by mixed methods. BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 11;5(8):e008566. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008566. PubMed 26264274 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Demographics, reason for encounter, survey responses

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Access criteria: No plans to share data at this time.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06998212
Lead sponsor
Blake Han
Collaborators
Riverside University Health System Medical Center
Responsible party
Blake Han (Research Coordinator, Riverside University Health System Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 31, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 31, 2025

Study contacts

Blake Han, BA
Contact
blakehanruhs@gmail.com
17143518083

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion