ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06992960CHITOSCARUpdated Aug 14, 2025

Evaluation of the Scar Healing Effects of ChitoCare Medical Scar Healing Gel in Women Undergoing Breast Reduction or Mastopexy Surgery (CHITOSCAR)

An interventional study of ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel (Örsáragel) and Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch in Surgical Scars, sponsored by Primex ehf. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Iceland. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-14.

Sponsored by Primex ehf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Patients undergoing breast reduction or mastopexy surgery will be screened and recruited for participation in the study. Eligible patients will act as their own control with one breast receiving the active intervention (ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel) and the other receiving standard of care (Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch). The active and control interventions will be applied for six months, and participants will be followed for up to 12 months. The scar properties of each breast will be assessed at study initiation (Day 0) and at study visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and via blinded assessment of photographs. Other subjective parameters such as pain, itching, and overall perception of the healed wound will be collected at each study visit via the POSAS, and patients' opinion, preferences, and compliance regarding the treatments will be collected via a basic questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Scars

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 39 is close to the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

Primex ehf is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written must be given
  • Female ≥ 18 years old
  • Having planned or very recently (within 21 days) undergone breast reduction or mastopexy surgery on both breasts
  • Not yet begun any treatment aimed at reducing scarring
  • Wound is not infected at the time of enrolment
  • Able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with serious concomitant disease (cancer, heart failure ( class IV), severe anaemia (\<100 g/L), neoplasia)
  • Any significant condition that may preclude the participant from the study (e.g. severe depression or psychiatric illness)
  • Patients who will require additional surgical procedures during the study
  • Patients diagnosed with connective tissue diseases
  • Previous treatment under this clinical protocol
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Receiving or scheduled to receive a medication or treatment which, in the opinion of the investigator, is known to interfere with, or affect the rate and quality of wound healing
  • Allergy to shellfish* (if unknown, the patient may try a small sample of the IP on their intact skin to assess for any potential allergic reaction.)
  • Medical condition likely to require systemic during the study period
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Smoker
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel (Örsáragel) administered topically twice daily for 6 months post-surgery

    Device: ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel (Örsáragel)

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch worn daily (continuous use, minimum 12 hrs per day as per the IFU) for 6 months post-surgery

    Device: Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch

Interventions

  • DeviceChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel (Örsáragel)

    ChitoCare® medical Scar Healing Gel is a topical gel indicated for the treatment of new and old scars. The Scar Healing Gel provides a soothing effect and support to the scar tissue to heal in an orderly manner. It protects against infections, stimulates cell proliferation in old and new scars, as well as correct tissue organization with proper collagen alignment for a better aesthetic appearance and skin flexibility. Ideal for treating scars after accidents, surgery, C-section and cosmetic surgery. For smoother and less visible scars. May be used by the whole population, also elderly and children.

  • DeviceAmoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch

    Amoena CuraScar Mammilla Circles Silicone Scar Patch and Amoena CuraScar Anchors Silicone Scar Patch are silicon-based, single-patient, multi-use scar patches intended for use as scar reduction therapy in surgical breast scars. The silicone creates a moist environment on the scar, which prevents the scar from drying out. It keeps the scar soft and has a positive effect on scar tissue. The devices are specifically designed for breast scarring and are shaped to fit the normal surgical scars experienced after breast surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of scar assessment at 12 months

    Comparison of the subjective assessment of scar appearance using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale 3.0 (POSAS) in active vs control group at 12-months post-surgery. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of scar assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months

    Comparison of the subjective assessment of scar appearance using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in active vs control group at 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 9 months post-surgery

  2. Improvement in subjective assessment of scar tissue

    Improvement of the subjective assessment of scar tissue between Day 0 and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the POSAS in active vs control arm. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-surgery

  3. Blinded assessment of scars

    Comparison of scar appearance at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months as judged by blinded assessment of photographs of active vs control intervention using the modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (mSBSES). For the modified SBSES, the scoring is structured such that higher scores indicate a better cosmetic outcome or less noticeable scarring. Scar width, height, colour, and presence of incision line are rated on a scale for 0-2, where 0 indicates a worse outcome, and 2 indicates similarity to normal skin. The best possible score is therefore 8, and worst outcome is 0.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-surgery

  4. Comparison of pain, discomfort, itching, and range of motion

    Comparison of pain or discomfort, itching, range of motion etc. between the groups as captured by the POSAS at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The POSAS 3.0, for both the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, rates each individual item on a 5-point scale. The minimum value for an item is 1, which corresponds to a scar characteristic or sensation that is like normal skin (a better outcome). The maximum value for an item is 5, which indicates the largest difference from normal skin or the worst imaginable scar characteristic or sensation (a worse outcome). The total score for the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale is calculated by summing the scores of the individual items within each scale. Consequently, for the POSAS 3.0, a higher total score on either the Patient Scale or the Observer Scale signifies a worse scar outcome or a greater severity of scar-related issues from that perspective.

    Time frame: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-surgery

  5. Adverse events

    Incidence of adverse events between arms

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  6. Comparison of treatment compliance

    Participants will be asked at 3 months and 6 months post-surgery how they would rate their compliance to each treatment (arm) via a basic questionnaire: a 5-point rating system will ask whether participants used/wore their treatment every day as recommended, most days but not always, only sometimes, rarely, or hardly ever/did no comply to treatment. Scores between the 2 arms will be compared for trends for treatment compliance.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  7. Cost comparison of treatments

    Cost of active vs control treatment in relation to outcomes over 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  8. Patient treatment preference

    Participants will be asked which treatment they preferred (i.e., active vs control treatment) via a questionnaire at 3 and 6 months

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Klíníkin Ármúla
    Reykjavik, Capital Region 108, Iceland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06992960
Lead sponsor
Primex ehf
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 28, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 14, 2025

Study contacts

Craig Fraser, PhD, MChem
Contact
craig@chitocare.com
+3548461912

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion