ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06980961SUPERSTARUpdated May 20, 2025

Short and Ultra-short-pulse ND: YAG 1064nm Lasers (Omer Smart and Omer Premium) for Stasis Dermatitis

An interventional study of short-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser and ultra-short-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser in Stasis Dermatitis, sponsored by Science Valley Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-20.

Sponsored by Science Valley Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tests two types of lasers (ND YAG 1064 short and ultra-short pulses) to treat hyperchromic skin lesions secondary to venous hypertension (stasis dermatitis)

Read the detailed description

Background: Stasis dermatitis with hyperpigmented skin lesions is a serious health problem for patients with chronic venous hypertension. Although no randomized studies have evaluated lasers for this treatment, lasers can be an attractive option.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, 3-arm, open-label, vehicle-controlled study will enroll patients scheduled to undergo treatment for stasis dermatitis with hyperpigmented skin lesions. Patients will be allocated to either Nd: YAG 1064 nm short pulse laser-nanoseconds (group 1), or Nd: YAG 1064 nm ultra-short-pulse laser-picoseconds (group 2), or cold cream vehicle control (group 3). All treatments are scheduled for 6 visits with pre-defined dates, with a final follow-up visit at intervals of 28 to 35 days. Primary outcomes include colorimetry analysis, secondary outcomes pre- and post-photographic analysis, and DLQI quality-of-life assessment.

Conclusions: The results of this trial will provide high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice on optimal management of hyperpigmented skin lesions secondary to stasis dermatitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stasis Dermatitis

Keywords

  • laser
  • stasis dermatitis
  • hyperchromic skin lesions
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Science Valley Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women or men aged 18 to 89 years with stasis dermatitis secondary to venous hypertension
  2. Agreement with the terms of the survey and signing of the form
  3. Availability to make the necessary appointments for treatment and follow-up
  4. Provide consent to avoid pregnancy during treatment
  5. Have primary venous hypertension already treated (treatment of varicose veins of the lower limbs) by any of the available techniques

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women with CEAP 2 to 6, low mobility, no stasis dermatitis.
  2. Peripheral arterial disease.
  3. History of known allergy to the drugs used in this study
  4. Presence of other types of dermatitis in the lower extremities, such as allergic stasis eczema.
  5. Presence of comorbidities (such as diabetes mellitus, heart failure, respiratory failure, hypertension, hypothyroidism, or hyperthyroidism), pregnancy, breastfeeding, pulmonary hypertension, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), family history of DVT, known hypercoagulable states or thrombophilia, asthma, and migraine.
  6. Anyone who does not agree with any of the search terms.

    -

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: ND YAG laser: 1064 nm short pulse (nanoseconds) - Omer Smart

    Laser treatment

    Procedure: short-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser

  • Experimental
    Arm 2: ND YAG laser: 1064 nm ultra- short pulse (picoseconds) - omer Premium

    Laser treatment

    Procedure: ultra-short-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm 3

    Control vehicle (cold cream)

    Drug: cold cream

Interventions

  • Procedureshort-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser

    Nd: YAG 1064 nm short pulse laser (5 nanoseconds), 4 mm spot size, from 100 to 1000 mJ total energy, treatment scheduled for six visits with pre-defined dates, with intervals of 28 to 35 days. The device will be Omer Smart, a Q-Switch Laser produced by Medical San (Lajeado, RS, Brazil).

    Also known as: Arm 1

  • Procedureultra-short-pulse ND: YAG 1064 laser

    Nd: YAG1064 nm ultra-short pulse laser (400 picoseconds), 2 to 10 mm spot size, from 100 to 1000 mJ total energy, treatment scheduled for 6 visits with pre-defined dates, with intervals of 28 to 35 days. The device will be Omer Premium, a picolaser produced by Medical San (Lajeado, RS, Brazil).

  • Drugcold cream

    The control vehicle is a cold cream, supplied by HERVA'S manipulation pharmacy. The composition of cold cream will be beeswax, acetyl palmitate, BHA, cetearyl alcohol, propylparaben, and water. This topical agent will be applied to patients daily throughout the treatment period. It is scheduled for six visits with pre-defined dates, with intervals of 28 to 35 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Colorimetry

    The skin tone dissimilarity (expressed as ΔE) at treated and adjacent areas measured with digital calorimetry. The ΔE value derives from the differences in the International Commission on Illumination L\*a\*b\* (CIELAB) color space. It is a structured approach to quantifying color differences, with specific intervals indicating varying levels of perceptibility with different intensities of pigmentation: * 0 \< ∆E \< 1 - the difference is unnoticeable * 1 \< ∆E\< 2 - the difference is only noticed by an experienced observer (mild), * 2 \< ∆E \< 3.5 - the difference is also noticed by an inexperienced observer (light), * 3.5 \< ∆E \< 5 - the difference is noticeable (moderate), * 5 \< ∆E - gives the impression that these are two different colors (intense) In all sessions, patients will be submitted to colorimetric analysis. The ∆E is the skin color difference between the treated and adjacent areas.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Photographic analysis

    The co-primary outcome will be the incidence of post-procedure skin hyperpigmentation improvement after six treatment sessions, evaluated through before-and-after photo documentation analysis by three experienced, independent, and blind observers. All the evaluators will have access to high-definition before-and-after pictures of the patient's legs that were designated for them. Then, according to their expertise, they will answer the question, "Do you think there's post-treatment improvement in hyperpigmentation in the treated areas of this limb, yes or no?" for the affected limb. The answers chosen by most of the evaluators will be considered for data analysis.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by clinical evaluation.

    Safety analysis will be carried out by clinical evaluation in all pre-scheduled visits. It includes clinical analysis of potential skin alterations such as abnormal redness, swelling, temporary changes in skin pigmentation (hyper- or hypopigmentation), petechia, scarring, or burns. It will be reported as the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. DLQI - quality-of-life

    The DLQI will be applied in the baseline and final visits and includes 10 questions: 1. Symptoms: How itchy, sore, painful, or stinging the skin has been. 2. Embarrassment: How embarrassed or self-conscious one has been due to their skin. 3. Daily Activities: How much has the skin condition interfered with shopping, home care, or gardening? 4. Clothing: How much has the skin condition influenced the clothes worn? 5. Social/Leisure: How much has the skin condition affected social or leisure activities? 6. Sport: How much the skin condition has made it difficult to do sports. 7. Work/Study: Whether the skin condition has prevented working or studying, and if not, how much it has been a problem. 8. Personal Relationships: How much the skin condition has created problems with close relationships. 9. Sex: How much the skin condition has caused sexual difficulties. 10. Treatment: How much the treatment for the skin condition has been a problem, considering factors like time or mess.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clinica Ramacciotti
    Santo Andre, SP 09090401, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vyas J, Johns JR, Ali FM, Ingram JR, Salek S, Finlay AY. A Systematic Review of 207 Studies Describing Validation Aspects of the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Nov 7;104:adv41120. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.41120. PubMed 39508500 ↗
  • Liu C, Huang HY, Chang YY, Sun CK, Chia SH, Liao YH. Optical Effects of Focused Fractional Nanosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG Laser: Techniques of Application on Human Skin. Lasers Surg Med. 2024 Aug;56(6):557-563. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23812. Epub 2024 Jun 18. PubMed 38890780 ↗
  • Ma S, Zhu H, Chen J, Chen F, Wu Y, He S, Li Y, Gong Y, Zhu H. Analysis of efficacy of picosecond laser treatment for nevus of Ota. Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 6;40(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04322-0. PubMed 39913065 ↗
  • Silverberg JI, Kirsner RS, Margolis DJ, Tharp M, Myers DE, Annis K, Graham D, Zang C, Vlahos BL, Sanders P. Efficacy and safety of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in participants aged >/=45 years with stasis dermatitis: Results from a fully decentralized, randomized, proof-of-concept phase 2a study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 May;90(5):945-952. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.12.048. Epub 2024 Feb 8. PubMed 38340127 ↗
  • Shriver MD, Parra EJ. Comparison of narrow-band reflectance spectroscopy and tristimulus colorimetry for measurements of skin and hair color in persons of different biological ancestry. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 May;112(1):17-27. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200005)112:13.0.CO;2-D. PubMed 10766940 ↗
  • Basra MK, Chowdhury MM, Smith EV, Freemantle N, Piguet V. A review of the use of the dermatology life quality index as a criterion in clinical guidelines and health technology assessments in psoriasis and chronic hand eczema. Dermatol Clin. 2012 Apr;30(2):237-44, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Dec 21. PubMed 22284138 ↗
  • Weatherall IL, Coombs BD. Skin color measurements in terms of CIELAB color space values. J Invest Dermatol. 1992 Oct;99(4):468-73. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12616156. PubMed 1402005 ↗
  • Ly BCK, Dyer EB, Feig JL, Chien AL, Del Bino S. Research Techniques Made Simple: Cutaneous Colorimetry: A Reliable Technique for Objective Skin Color Measurement. J Invest Dermatol. 2020 Jan;140(1):3-12.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.11.003. PubMed 31864431 ↗
  • Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1994 May;19(3):210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x. PubMed 8033378 ↗
  • Liu J, Han C, Feng X, Liang J, Qu Y. Effective Picosecond Nd:YAG laser on seborrheic dermatitis and its mechanism. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jun;21(6):2449-2457. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14414. Epub 2021 Sep 8. PubMed 34496116 ↗
  • Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, Bergman JN, Chamlin SL, Cohen DE, Cooper KD, Cordoro KM, Davis DM, Feldman SR, Hanifin JM, Margolis DJ, Silverman RA, Simpson EL, Williams HC, Elmets CA, Block J, Harrod CG, Smith Begolka W, Sidbury R. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jul;71(1):116-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 May 9. PubMed 24813302 ↗
  • Dissemond J, Knab J, Lehnen M, Franckson T, Goos M. Successful treatment of stasis dermatitis with topical tacrolimus. Vasa. 2004 Nov;33(4):260-2. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526.33.4.260. PubMed 15623206 ↗
  • Silverberg JI, Hou A, Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, DeKoven JG, Zug KA, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, Fransway AF, DeLeo VA, Pratt MD, Reeder MJ, Atwater AR, Fowler JF Jr, Zirwas MJ, Marks JG Jr. Prevalence and trend of allergen sensitization in patients with a diagnosis of stasis dermatitis referred for patch testing, North American contact dermatitis group data, 2001-2016. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022 Nov;314(9):857-867. doi: 10.1007/s00403-021-02295-y. Epub 2021 Nov 8. PubMed 34748058 ↗
  • Sundaresan S, Migden MR, Silapunt S. Stasis Dermatitis: Pathophysiology, Evaluation, and Management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017 Jun;18(3):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s40257-016-0250-0. PubMed 28063094 ↗
  • Abbade LP, Lastoria S, Rollo Hde A. Venous ulcer: clinical characteristics and risk factors. Int J Dermatol. 2011 Apr;50(4):405-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04654.x. PubMed 21413949 ↗
  • Bergan JJ, Schmid-Schonbein GW, Smith PD, Nicolaides AN, Boisseau MR, Eklof B. Chronic venous disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 3;355(5):488-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra055289. No abstract available. PubMed 16885552 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized participant data can be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed based on scientific merit. After a proposal is approved, data can be shared through a secure online platform upon signing a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: 2 years

Access criteria: Anonymised participant data can be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data access agreement.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06980961
Lead sponsor
Science Valley Research Institute
Responsible party
Eduardo Ramacciotti (Senior investigator, Science Valley Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2025
Start date
May 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 20, 2025

Study contacts

Valéria Aguiar, MD
Contact
val.aguiarvasc@gmail.com
+5511950212099
Eduardo Ramacciotti, MD, Ph.D, livre docente
study chair · Science Valley Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion