ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06958588SOPHIEUpdated May 6, 2025

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy or Pneumatic Compression VTE Prophylaxis

A Phase 4 interventional study of Experimental: Hyperslim and Active Comparator #1 in Venous Thromboembolism (VTE), Intensive Care Medicine and Venous Thromboembolism, sponsored by Science Valley Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-06.

Sponsored by Science Valley Research Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequent in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Pharmacologic prophylaxis is sometimes contraindicated, and mechanical prophylaxis is used. The primary objective of the study is to compare Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF) with conventional mechanical prophylaxis for the prevention of VTE in patients in the ICU.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study, patients with indication for mechanical VTE prophylaxis or combined mechanical and pharmacological in the ICU from 2 selected sites in Brazil (Vera Cruz Hospital and Felicio Rocho Hospital, both in Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil) will be enrolled after signing informed consent. All data will be recorded with a pre-established clinical recording file (CRF - RedCap) to demographics, risk factors, and clinical aspects of the patient's comorbidities.

A trained team member will perform clinical diagnosis and standard clinical evaluations, including imaging when indicated. Patients will be considered eligible if they are> 18 years old, have a PADUA score > 4 (medical patients) and/or Caprini > of 3 (surgical patients), and have a contraindication to pharmacological prophylaxis or indication to combined (pharmacological and mechanical VTE prophylaxis).

After signing informed consent, the patients will be screened and included in the study. After ICU admission, the patient will be interviewed by study investigators or trained physicians or nurses; inclusion patients will be randomized to receive either PEMF or intermittent pneumatic compression.

The devices will be placed in the ICUs following institutional standards and operational procedures. After randomization, trained physiotherapy and nurse teams will place and monitor each device. The intermittent pneumatic compression group will use the devices Covidien Kendall SCD 700® (Cardinal Health) or Doctor Life 2600® (Venosan). This group will have the device placed in the lower limbs, following the manufacturer's instructions, and monitored for 24 hours according to previous institutional protocol. This device will be kept full-time working in the patients while in the ICU.

The PEMF will be carried out using the Hyperslim® device. The Hyperslim® device is produced by Medical San (Lageado, RS, Brazil). It generates electromagnetic pulses through its pads, leading to local muscular supra-maximal contractions sustained for several seconds, increasing stress and workload without muscular adaptation. Its pads will be placed in the patient's lower limbs and used for 30 minutes thrice daily.

The critical care team will monitor patients 24 hours/day for VTE signs and symptoms, laboratory changes, and adverse local effects caused by machines like skin lesions, burns, and edema. A tolerability scale will be applied to every awake patient able to answer using a scale: 1= well tolerated; 2= tolerate with little discomfort; 3= tolerate with discomfort; 4= Not tolerated.

At the end of mechanical prophylaxis, patients will be evaluated for thromboembolic events, including diagnosis by imaging, with a mandatory Doppler ultrasound of the lower limbs at ICU discharge and 30 days post-randomization.

The primary efficacy outcome is a combination of symptomatic + asymptomatic VTE events at day 30 post randomization.

Evaluation also includes major bleeding events, defined as leading to transfusion of 2 or more units of blood or packed red cells, decrease in hemoglobin of 2 g/dL, bleeding in critical sites, defined as spinal, epidural, intraocular, intracranial, pericardial or retroperitoneal, local adverse events, including adverse events related to the use of the devices.

For descriptive statistics, mean and SD will be calculated for data following a Gaussian distribution.

The difference in VTE events between the two groups at the end of mechanical prophylaxis and day 30 will be tested using the intention-to-treat principle.

The efficacy analysis tests will be one-sided, with a type I error rate of 2·5%, assuming a two-sided 95% CI. The cumulative incidence of the composite events will be compared between the test and control groups, and the relative risk (RR) or risk ratio will be estimated. For the safety analysis, statistical tests will be two-sided, with a type I error rate of 5% and a two-sided 95% CI.

Tolerability, security, and facility to implement PEMF will be compared with intermittent pneumatic compression using an unpaired t-test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

  • venous thromboembolism
  • Mechanical prophylaxis
  • Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF)
  • ICU
  • intensive care unit
03

In context

Venous Thromboembolism

712 studies on the registry are indexed under Venous Thromboembolism; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 240 across 401 interventional studies indexed under Venous Thromboembolism.

Browse Venous Thromboembolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Science Valley Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients > 18 years old in ICU
  2. PADUA score> 4 (medical patients) and/or Caprini score> 3 (surgical patients)
  3. to pharmacological prophylaxis or indication to combined (pharmacological and mechanical VTE prophylaxis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients \< 18 years old in ICU
  2. Unable to use mechanical prophylaxis due to trauma, burns, fracture, or problems in inferior members that prevent the use of mechanical prophylaxis
  3. Life expectations less than 24 hours
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hyperslim

    Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMF)

    Device: Experimental: Hyperslim

  • Active comparator
    Mechanical compression

    Intermittent pneumatic compression ( Covidien Kendall SCD 700®, Cardinal Health or Doctor Life 2600® Venosan)

    Device: Active Comparator #1

Interventions

  • DeviceExperimental: Hyperslim

    The PEMF will be carried out using the Hyperslim® device. The Hyperslim® device is produced by Medical San (Lageado, RS, Brazil).

  • DeviceActive Comparator #1

    The intermittent pneumatic compression group will use the devices Covidien Kendall SCD 700® (Cardinal Health) or Doctor Life 2600® (Venosan).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary efficacy outcome

    The primary outcome is a composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic VTE (detected by mandatory Doppler ultrasound 24-48 hours after the end of mechanical prophylaxis or PEMF and on day 30 post-randomization) and death due to pulmonary embolism.

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Caprini JA. Mechanical methods for thrombosis prophylaxis. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2010 Dec;16(6):668-73. doi: 10.1177/1076029609348645. Epub 2009 Oct 22. PubMed 19850588 ↗
  • Nicolaides AN, Fareed J, Spyropoulos AC, Kakkar RHL, Antignani PL, Avgerinos E, Baekgaard N, Barber E, Bush RL, Caprini JA, Clarke-Pearson DL, VAN Dreden P, Elalami I, Gerotziafas G, Gibbs H, Goldhaber S, Kakkos S, Lefkou E, Labropoulos N, Lopes RD, Mansilha A, Papageorgiou C, Prandoni P, Ramacciotti E, Rognoni C, Urbanek T, Walenga JM. Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. International Consensus Statement. Guidelines according to scientific evidence. Int Angiol. 2024 Feb;43(1):1-222. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.23.05177-5. No abstract available. PubMed 38421381 ↗
  • Bounes F, Ferrandis R, Frere C, Helms J, Llau JV. European guidelines on peri-operative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: first update.: Chapter 4: Prophylaxis in critical care patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Aug 1;41(8):582-588. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002011. Epub 2024 Jul 10. No abstract available. PubMed 38957023 ↗
  • Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, Prandoni P, Bounameaux H, Goldhaber SZ, Nelson ME, Wells PS, Gould MK, Dentali F, Crowther M, Kahn SR. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e419S-e496S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2301. PubMed 22315268 ↗
  • Schunemann HJ, Cushman M, Burnett AE, Kahn SR, Beyer-Westendorf J, Spencer FA, Rezende SM, Zakai NA, Bauer KA, Dentali F, Lansing J, Balduzzi S, Darzi A, Morgano GP, Neumann I, Nieuwlaat R, Yepes-Nunez JJ, Zhang Y, Wiercioch W. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients. Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3198-3225. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018022954. PubMed 30482763 ↗
  • Ho KM, Chavan S, Pilcher D. Omission of early thromboprophylaxis and mortality in critically ill patients: a multicenter registry study. Chest. 2011 Dec;140(6):1436-46. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1444. Epub 2011 Sep 22. PubMed 21940768 ↗
  • Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, Sadeghirad B, Arabi YM, Cook DJ, Moller MH, Mehta S, Fowler RA, Burns KEA, Wells PS, Carrier M, Crowther MA, Scales DC, English SW, Kyeremanteng K, Kanji S, Kho ME, Rochwerg B. VTE Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Chest. 2022 Feb;161(2):418-428. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.050. Epub 2021 Aug 19. PubMed 34419428 ↗
  • Lauzier F, Muscedere J, Deland E, Kutsogiannis DJ, Jacka M, Heels-Ansdell D, Crowther M, Cartin-Ceba R, Cox MJ, Zytaruk N, Foster D, Sinuff T, Clarke F, Thompson P, Hanna S, Cook D; Co-operative Network of Critical Care Knowledge Translation for Thromboprophylaxis (CONECCKT-T) Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Thromboprophylaxis patterns and determinants in critically ill patients: a multicenter audit. Crit Care. 2014 Apr 25;18(2):R82. doi: 10.1186/cc13844. PubMed 24766968 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymized participant data can be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed based on scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data access agreement.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: March 2025 to March 2030

Access criteria: Anonymized participant data can be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed based on scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data access agreement.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06958588
Lead sponsor
Science Valley Research Institute
Collaborators
Hospital Vera Cruz
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 6, 2025
Start date
May 25, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2025

Study contacts

Eduardo Fonseca Sad, MD
Contact
edu.sad@uol.com.br
+55 31 991717860
Eduardo Ramacciotti, MD, Ph.D.
study chair · Science Valley Research Organization

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion